scholarly journals Post-procedural tricuspid regurgitation predicts long-term survival in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 524-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwin Bannehr ◽  
Ulrike Kahn ◽  
Maki Okamoto ◽  
Hidehiro Kaneko ◽  
Valentin Hähnel ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas S. Triantafyllis ◽  
Friso Kortlandt ◽  
Annelies L.M. Bakker ◽  
Martin J. Swaans ◽  
Frank D. Eefting ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 104 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dania Mohty ◽  
Thomas A. Orszulak ◽  
Hartzell V. Schaff ◽  
Jean-Francois Avierinos ◽  
Jamil A. Tajik ◽  
...  

Background Mitral regurgitation (MR) due to mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is often treatable by surgical repair. However, the very long-term (>10-year) durability of repair in both anterior leaflet prolapse (AL-MVP) and posterior leaflet prolapse (PL-MVP) is unknown. Methods and Results In 917 patients (aged 65±13 years, 68% male), surgical correction of severe isolated MR due to MVP (679 repairs and 238 replacements [MVRs]) was performed between 1980 and 1995. Survival after repair was better than survival after MVR for both PL-MVP (at 15 years, 41±5% versus 31±6%, respectively; P =0.0003) and AL-MVP (at 14 years, 42±8% versus 31±5%, respectively; P =0.003). In multivariate analysis adjusting for predictors of survival, repair was independently associated with lower mortality in PL-MVP (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.85; P =0.0034) and in AL-MVP (adjusted RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.96; P =0.028). The reoperation rate was not different after repair or MVR overall (at 19 years, 20±5% for repair versus 23±5% for MVR; P =0.4) or separately in PL-MVP ( P =0.3) or AL-MVP ( P =0.3). However, the reoperation rate was higher after repair of AL-MVP than after repair of PL-MVP (at 15 years, 28±7% versus 11±3%, respectively; P =0.0006). From the 1980s to the 1990s, the RR of reoperation after repair of AL-MVP versus PL-MVP did not change (RR 2.5 versus 2.7, respectively; P =0.58), but the absolute rate of reoperation decreased similarly in PL-MVP and AL-MVP (at 10 years, from 10±3% to 5±2% and from 24±6% to 10±2%, respectively; P =0.04). Conclusions In severe MR due to MVP, mitral valve repair compared with MVR provides improved very long-term survival after surgery for both AL-MVP and PL-MVP. Reoperation is similarly required after repair or replacement but is more frequent after repair of AL-MVP. Recent improvement in long-term durability of repair suggests that it should be the preferred mode of surgical correction of MVP whether it affects anterior or posterior leaflets and is an additional incentive for early surgery of severe MR due to MVP.


Circulation ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 104 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. I-1-I-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dania Mohty ◽  
Thomas A. Orszulak ◽  
Hartzell V. Schaff ◽  
Jean-Francois Avierinos ◽  
Jamil A. Tajik ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Drohomirecka ◽  
Tomasz Zieliński ◽  
Piotr Kołsut ◽  
Paweł Litwiński ◽  
Nadzeya Buraya ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yujiro Yokoyama ◽  
Hisato Takagi ◽  
Toshiki Kuno

Background: Benefits and risks of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) through right mini-thoracotomy and robotic surgery for mitral valve are not fully understood. We conducted a network meta-analysis comparing the perioperative and long-term outcomes of mitral valve surgery via conventional sternotomy, MICS and robot. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through March 15th, 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-score matched (PSM) trials that investigated perioperative and long-term outcomes after mitral surgery via conventional sternotomy, MICS and robot. Subanalyses were conducted by restricting trials, in which mitral valve repair was tried first for all patients. Results: Our systematic literature search identified 2 RCTs and 21 PSM trials. MICS was related to significant decrease in PM ([RR] [95% confidence interval [CI] =0.56 [0.40-0.78]] and SSI (RR [95%CI] =0.53 [0.33-0.85) compared to conventional sternatomy. Re-exploration for bleeding was significantly higher in robot compared to sternotomy (RR [95% CI] =1.56 [1.03-2.37]), and transfusion was higher in sternotomy compared to MICS (RR [95%CI] =1.63 [1.27-2.08]). No significant differences were observed in perioperative mortality, MI, stroke, and LCOS among there procedures. Similarly, there were no significant differences in long-term survival and mitral valve reoperation. Suanalyses by restricting trials in which mitral valve repair tried first for all patients showed MICS was related to significant increase in mitral valve reoperation compared to conventional sternotomy (hazard ratio [95%CI] =7.33 [1.54-34.97]) (Figure). Conclusion: Our network meta-analysis demonstrated similar long-term survival and mitral valve reoperation. However, MICS was related to significant increase in mitral valve reoperation after mitral valve repair compared to conventional sternotomy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Remenyi ◽  
Rachel Webb ◽  
Tom Gentles ◽  
Peter Russell ◽  
Kirsten Finucane ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod H. Thourani ◽  
William S. Weintraub ◽  
Robert A. Guyton ◽  
Ellis L. Jones ◽  
Willis H. Williams ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document