Incidence and Management of Mesh Extrusion or Vaginal Erosion after Genital Prolapse Surgery Repair

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. S153-S154
Author(s):  
V. Solà ◽  
P. Ricci ◽  
J. Pardo
2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Paul Roovers ◽  
Anske van der Bom ◽  
Jules Schagen van Leeuwen ◽  
Piet Scholten ◽  
Peter Heintz ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khurshida Tahmin ◽  
Shamsun Nahar Begum

This Randomised controlled clinical trial was undertaken to determine the suitable time of catheter removal after urogenital prolapse surgery in order to reduce the catheter related UTI and its long term sequel. Method: Total 80 patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic floor repair were enrolled and randomised into two equal groups by lottery method. Trans-urethral catheter was removed on 2nd & 5th post operative day in group I (n=40) and in group II (n=40) respectively. Post   voidal residual urine volume before operation and after removal of catheter was measured in   all patients by ultrasound scanning. Re-catheterisation was done for three more days if residual volume > 200ml after removal of catheter. Urine samples were taken before removal of catheter and send for routine microscopic examination and culture & sensitivity test to detect UTI.Results: Removal of catheter on 2nd post-operative day lead to significant reduction of rate of UTI. The rate of UTI following removal of catheter was 7.5% versus 42.5% in group I and in group II (p<0.001). But need for recatheterisation was significantly higher in group I (15%) than in group II (2.5%). The mean duration of catheterisation was 47.63 (±0.628) and 119.35 (±0.864) hours in group I and group II respectively. Majority of the patients in group I did not  require prolongation of catheterisation. Mean duration of hospital stay after operation was 5 days in group I and 7.95 days in group II (p<0.001). Conclusion: Short period catheterisation is associated with lower rate of UTI and shorter hospital stay. Disadvantages of prolonged catheterisation outweigh the advantages. Therefore removal of the catheter on the 2nd post-operative day after genital prolapse surgery is preferable than 5 days catheterization DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjog.v26i2.13782 Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2011; Vol. 26(2) : 68-71


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1535-1538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clay Jean-Charles ◽  
Chrystèle Rubod ◽  
Mathias Brieu ◽  
Malik Boukerrou ◽  
Jean Fasel ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-43
Author(s):  
Farzana Rabee Choudhury ◽  
Maliha Rashid ◽  
Ratu Rumana ◽  
ABM Zakir Uddin ◽  
Nilufar Nasrin Ava

Background: Genital prolapse is a common gynaecological problem in developing country like Bangladesh.Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the advantages of short term catheterization in comparison to long term catheterization after genital prolapse surgery. Methodology: This was a prospective analytical cross sectional study being carried out from 1st July 2005 to 30th July 2006 in the Department of Gynaecology & Obstetrics of Sir Salimullah Medical College & Mitford Hospital. A total of 200 patients undergoing genital prolapse surgery were selected for this study. Patients were divided into two groups. In short term catheterization group the urinary catheter was withdrawal within one day after surgery and in the short term catheterization group the catheter was remained in situ for 5 days after surgery. Result: Positive urine culture was found in 16% in long term catheterization group compared with 6% in short term group (P=0.02). Mean duration of hospital stay was 6.98 days in long term catheterization group and 4.68 days in short term catheterization group (P<0.01). Residual volume was more than 200 ml and need for re-catheterization occurred in 3% in group whereas it was 10% in case group (P=0.04). Conclusion: This study permits to conclude that short term catheterization is better than long term catheterization. J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll, 2011;3 (2): 41-43 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jssmc.v3i2.12077


Urologiia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2_2017 ◽  
pp. 14-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.B. Filimonov Filimonov ◽  
R.V. Vasin Vasin ◽  
I.V. Vasina Vasina ◽  
A.D. Kaprin Kaprin ◽  
A.A. Kostin Kostin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
L. Boulanger ◽  
M. Boukerrou ◽  
C. Rubod ◽  
A. Fruchart ◽  
R.J. Courcol ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 254-261
Author(s):  
S.J. González Palanca ◽  
E.J. González Veiga ◽  
G. Palmeiro Fernández ◽  
J.C. Domínguez Salgado ◽  
H. Mariño Méndez ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. S411-S411
Author(s):  
R. Unkels ◽  
M. Goeckenjan-Festag ◽  
J. Unkels ◽  
N. Mmuni ◽  
A. Pegwa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document