Determining Proficiency in Laparoscopic Staging for Endometrial Cancer in Gynecologic Oncology Fellows

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. S170-S171
Author(s):  
A.L. Jackson ◽  
C. Raker ◽  
P. Disilvestro
2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 2360-2364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco M. Muggia ◽  
John A. Blessing ◽  
Joel Sorosky ◽  
Gary C. Reid

PURPOSE: To determine whether pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has antitumor activity in pretreated patients with persistent or recurrent endometrial carcinoma and to define the nature and degree of toxicity of PLD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with histologically documented recurrent or persistent measurable endometrial carcinoma and with failure of one prior treatment regardless of prior anthracycline therapy were enrolled. PLD was administered intravenously over a 1-hour period at a dose of 50 mg/m2 every 4 weeks; the dosage was modified in accordance with observed toxicity. RESULTS: Of 46 patients entered, 42 were assessable for response, as three were declared ineligible on central pathology review and one was not assessable for response. Forty had received prior chemotherapy, 11 hormonal therapy, and 29 radiation therapy. Doxorubicin had been given to 32 patients, carboplatin with paclitaxel to six, carboplatin to one, and fluorouracil to one. Four patients had partial responses lasting 1.1, 2.1, 3.3, and 5.4 months; the overall response rate was 9.5% (95% confidence interval, 2.7% to 22.6%). Three of these responses (in liver and in lymph node) occurred in patients who had progressed after doxorubicin with either paclitaxel or cisplatin. The median number of courses was 2.5 (range, one to 14). Toxicity was generally mild: only 25 patients experienced leukopenia, with a median WBC count of 2,900 (range, 800 to 3,900) at nadir. The only grade 4 toxicities were one episode each of esophagitis, hematuria, and vomiting. The median overall survival was 8.2 months. CONCLUSION: PLD has only limited activity in pretreated advanced, recurrent endometrial cancer, but further trials in anthracycline-naive patients and in previously untreated patients are ongoing. Its toxicity profile should permit its use in combination with myelosuppressive drugs.


2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1121-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley B. Conrad ◽  
Pedro T. Ramirez ◽  
William Burke ◽  
R. Wendel Naumann ◽  
Kari L. Ring ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo evaluate the current patterns of use of minimally invasive surgical procedures, including traditional, robotic-assisted, and single-port laparoscopy, by Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) members and to compare the results to those of our 2004 and 2007 surveys.MethodsThe Society of Gynecologic Oncology members were surveyed through an online or mailed-paper survey. Data were analyzed and compared with results of our prior surveys.ResultsFour hundred six (32%) of 1279 SGO members responded. Eighty-three percent of respondents (n = 337) performed traditional laparoscopic surgery (compared with 84% in 2004 and 91% in 2007). Ninety-seven percent of respondents performed robotic surgery (compared with 27% in 2007). When respondents were asked to indicate procedures that they performed with the robot but not with traditional laparoscopy, 75% indicated radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Overall, 70% of respondents indicated that hysterectomy and staging for uterine cancer was the procedure they most commonly performed with a minimally invasive approach. Only 17% of respondents who performed minimally invasive surgery performed single-port laparoscopy, and only 5% of respondents indicated that single-port laparoscopy has an important or very important role in the field.ConclusionsSince our prior surveys, we found a significant increase in the overall use and indications for robotic surgery. Radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer and total hysterectomy and staging for endometrial cancer were procedures found to be significantly more appropriate for the robotic platform in comparison to traditional laparoscopy. The indications for laparoscopy have expanded beyond endometrial cancer staging to include surgical management of early-stage cervical and ovarian cancers, but the use of single-port laparoscopy remains limited.


2017 ◽  
Vol 147 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulina Cybulska ◽  
Maria B. Schiavone ◽  
Brandon Sawyer ◽  
Ginger J. Gardner ◽  
Oliver Zivanovic ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document