Spinal reflex in human lower leg muscles evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

2009 ◽  
Vol 180 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Kitano ◽  
David M. Koceja
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3633
Author(s):  
Atsushi Sasaki ◽  
Roberto M. de Freitas ◽  
Dimitry G. Sayenko ◽  
Yohei Masugi ◽  
Taishin Nomura ◽  
...  

Cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been utilized in applications for improving upper-limb sensory and motor function in patients with spinal cord injury. Although therapeutic effects of continuous cervical tSCS interventions have been reported, neurophysiological mechanisms remain largely unexplored. Specifically, it is not clear whether sub-threshold intensity and 10-min duration continuous cervical tSCS intervention can affect the central nervous system excitability. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate effects of sub-motor-threshold 10-min continuous cervical tSCS applied at rest on the corticospinal and spinal reflex circuit in ten able-bodied individuals. Neurophysiological assessments were conducted to investigate (1) corticospinal excitability via transcranial magnetic stimulation applied on the primary motor cortex to evoke motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and (2) spinal reflex excitability via single-pulse tSCS applied at the cervical level to evoke posterior root muscle (PRM) reflexes. Measurements were recorded from multiple upper-limb muscles before, during, and after the intervention. Our results showed that low-intensity and short-duration continuous cervical tSCS intervention applied at rest did not significantly affect corticospinal and spinal reflex excitability. The stimulation duration and/or intensity, as well as other stimulating parameters selection, may therefore be critical for inducing neuromodulatory effects during cervical tSCS.


2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ursula S. Hofstoetter ◽  
William B. McKay ◽  
Keith E. Tansey ◽  
Winfried Mayr ◽  
Helmut Kern ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Roberto M. de Freitas ◽  
Atsushi Sasaki ◽  
Dimitry G. Sayenko ◽  
Yohei Masugi ◽  
Taishin Nomura ◽  
...  

Cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) efficacy for rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function was suggested to depend on recruitment of Ia afferents. However, selectivity and excitability of motor activation with different electrode configurations remains unclear. In this study, activation of upper-limb motor pools was examined with different cathode and anode configurations during cervical tSCS in 10 able-bodied individuals. Muscle responses were measured from six upper-limb muscles simultaneously. First, post-activation depression was confirmed with tSCS paired pulses (50 ms interval) for each cathode configuration (C6, C7, and T1 vertebral levels), with anode on the anterior neck. Selectivity and excitability of activation of the upper-limb motor pools were examined by comparing the recruitment curves (10-100 mA) of first evoked responses across muscles and cathode configurations. Our results showed that hand muscles were preferentially activated when the cathode was placed over T1 compared to the other vertebral levels, while there was no selectivity for proximal arm muscles. Furthermore, higher stimulation intensities were required to activate distal hand muscles than proximal arm muscles, suggesting different excitability thresholds between muscles. In a separate protocol, responses were compared between anode configurations (anterior neck, shoulders, iliac crests, and back), with one selected cathode configuration. The level of discomfort was also assessed. Largest muscle responses were elicited with the anode configuration over the anterior neck, while there were no differences in the discomfort. Our results therefore inform methodological considerations for electrode configuration to help optimize recruitment of Ia afferents during cervical tSCS.


2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. E176-E186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ursula S. Hofstoetter ◽  
Matthias Krenn ◽  
Simon M. Danner ◽  
Christian Hofer ◽  
Helmut Kern ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e0147479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon M. Danner ◽  
Matthias Krenn ◽  
Ursula S. Hofstoetter ◽  
Andrea Toth ◽  
Winfried Mayr ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document