A drug-vs-food “choice” self-administration procedure in rats to investigate pharmacological and environmental mechanisms of substance use disorders

2021 ◽  
Vol 354 ◽  
pp. 109110
Author(s):  
E. Andrew Townsend ◽  
Kathryn L. Schwienteck ◽  
Hannah L. Robinson ◽  
Stephen T. Lawson ◽  
Matthew L. Banks
Author(s):  
Subramaniam Jayanthi ◽  
Ritvik Peesapati ◽  
Michael T. McCoy ◽  
Bruce Ladenheim ◽  
Jean Lud Cadet

AbstractMethamphetamine (METH) use disorder (MUD) is characterized by compulsive and repeated drug taking despite negative life consequences. Large intake of METH in humans and animals is accompanied by dysfunctions in learning and memory processes. The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is known to modulate synaptic plasticity and cognitive functions. In addition, the ECS has been implicated in some of the manifestations of substance use disorders (SUDs). We therefore sought to identify potential changes in the expression of various enzymes and of the receptors (CB1 and CB2) that are members of that system. Herein, we used a model of METH self-administration (SA) that includes a punishment phase (footshocks) that helps to separate rats into a compulsive METH phenotype (compulsive) that continues to take METH and a non-compulsive METH (abstinent) group that suppressed or stopped taking METH. Animals were euthanized 2 h after the last METH SA session and their hippocampi were used to measure mRNA levels of cannabinoid receptors (CB/Cnr), as well as those of synthesizing (DAGL-A, DAGL-B, NAPEPLD) and metabolizing (MGLL, FAAH, PTGS2) enzymes of the endocannabinoid cascade. Non-compulsive rats exhibited significant increased hippocampal expression of CB1/Cnr1 and CB2/Cnr2 mRNAs. mRNA levels of the synthesizing enzyme, DAGL-A, and of the metabolic enzymes, MGLL and FAAH, were also increased. Non-compulsive rats also exhibited a significant decrease in hippocampal Ptgs2 mRNA levels. Taken together, these observations implicate the hippocampal endocannabinoid system in the suppression of METH intake in the presence of adverse consequences.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Michelle Tuten ◽  
Hendree E. Jones ◽  
Cindy M. Schaeffer ◽  
Maxine L. Stitzer

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. C. van Boekel ◽  
E. P. M. Brouwers ◽  
J. van Weeghel ◽  
H. F. L. Garretsen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document