Breast Cancer Screening Shared Decision-Making in Older African-American Women

2020 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. 556-560
Author(s):  
Brooke Salzman ◽  
Anna Bistline ◽  
Amy Cunningham ◽  
Alexis Silverio ◽  
Randa Sifri
1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 286-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Tessaro ◽  
Eugenia Eng ◽  
Jacqueline Smith

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of the cultural meanings that shape the breast cancer screening behavior of older African-American women. Design. Qualitative research methods elicited social and cultural themes related to breast cancer screening. Setting. Focus group interviews were conducted in the natural settings (churches, etc.) of older African-American women. Subjects. Interviews were conducted with 132 members from 14 social networks of older African-American women. Measures. A focus group guide asked about 1) perceived risk of breast cancer, 2) behavioral intentions about breast cancer screening, 3) health seeking behavior, and 4) social support. Results. For older African-American women: other health concerns are of more concern than breast cancer; age is generally not recognized as a risk factor for breast cancer; fear of finding breast cancer and its social consequences are salient barriers to mammography; they tend to rely on breast self-exam rather than mammography to detect a breast problem; cost may be more an issue of competing priorities than cost per se; the tradition is to go to doctors for a problem, not prevention; and women in their own social networks are important sources of social support for health concerns. Conclusions. These data offer explanations for mammography screening in older African-American women and emphasize the strength of naturally existing sources of social support for designing interventions to increase breast cancer screening.


Author(s):  
Paula Riganti ◽  
M. Victoria Ruiz Yanzi ◽  
Camila Micaela Escobar Liquitay ◽  
Karin S Kopitowski ◽  
Juan VA Franco

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Davis ◽  
Tamara J. Cadet ◽  
Matthew Moore ◽  
Kathleen Darby

2003 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Ann Coleman ◽  
Sharon Coon ◽  
Carolyn Mohrmann ◽  
Susan Hardin ◽  
Beth Stewart ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baqar A Husaini ◽  
Janice S Emerson ◽  
Pamela C Hull ◽  
Darren E Sherkat ◽  
Robert S Levine ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly Frank ◽  
Nicole Fowler

Background/Objective: Mammography is one of the most effective ways to diagnose breast cancer early; however, its perceived benefits are complicated by terminal conditions such as dementia. By undergoing mammography, women with dementia risk treatment complications and false-positive results, which can exacerbate psychological distress. The lack of a standard of care confounds the individual roles of the patient, family caregiver, and physician in the decision-making process. This study evaluates the relationship between dementia severity and family caregiver preferences for shared decision making. Methods: Data were gathered from the Decisions about Cancer screening in Alzheimer’s Disease trial, which uses the Dementia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS) and a revised version of the Control Preferences Scale (CPS) to assess family caregiver preferences for decision-making as a dyad (patient and caregiver) and triad (patient, caregiver, and physician). Two multinomial logistic regression models assessed the relationship between DSRS and CPS categories (active, passive, and collaborative), while controlling for the caregivers’ age, gender, education, relationship to patient, self-perceived income, and race. Both models used the “active” group as the baseline; however, Model 1 examined preferences as a dyad and Model 2 as a triad. Results: Model 1 found a statistically significant association between dementia severity and a collaborative approach (p<0.001), and between dementia severity and a passive approach (p=0.014). For every one-unit increase in DSRS score, the odds of being in the collaborative group decreased by 0.083 and the odds of being in the passive group decreased by 0.085. There was no statistically significant association between dementia severity and decision-making preferences in Model 2. Clinical Significance: The association between dementia severity and family caregiver decision-making preferences supports the need for a standard of care regarding breast cancer screening in women with dementia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document