scholarly journals Roles of sagittal anatomical parameters in femoral component alignment of primary posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. S475-S476
Author(s):  
H. Li ◽  
F. Zhu ◽  
W. Liao ◽  
Z. Zhang;
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Component ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Posterior Stabilized ◽  
Component Alignment ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Anatomical Parameters

Total knee arthroplasty after distal femoral osteotomy long-term survivorship and clinical outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (6) ◽  
pp. 660-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. P. Chalmers ◽  
A. K. Limberg ◽  
A. G. Athey ◽  
K. I. Perry ◽  
M. W. Pagnano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Femoral Component ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Osteotomy ◽  
Posterior Stabilized ◽  
Distal Femoral Osteotomy ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean

Aims There is little literature about total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after distal femoral osteotomy (DFO). Consequently, the purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of TKA after DFO, with particular emphasis on: survivorship free from aseptic loosening, revision, or any re-operation; complications; radiological results; and clinical outcome. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients (17 women, 12 men) from our total joint registry who had undergone 31 cemented TKAs after a DFO between 2000 and 2012. Their mean age at TKA was 51 years (22 to 76) and their mean body mass index 32 kg/m2 (20 to 45). The mean time between DFO and TKA was ten years (2 to 20). The mean follow-up from TKA was ten years (2 to 16). The prostheses were posterior-stabilized in 77%, varus-valgus constraint (VVC) in 13%, and cruciate-retaining in 10%. While no patient had metaphyseal fixation (e.g. cones or sleeves), 16% needed a femoral stem. Results The ten-year survivorship was 95% with aseptic loosening as the endpoint, 88% with revision for any reason as the endpoint, and 81% with re-operation for any reason as the endpoint. Three TKAs were revised for instability (n = 2) and aseptic tibial loosening (n = 1). No femoral component was revised for aseptic loosening. Patients under the age of 50 years were at greater risk of revision for any reason (hazard ratio 7; p = 0.03). There were two additional re-operations (6%) and four complications (13%), including three manipulations under anaesthetic (MUA; 10%). The Knee Society scores improved from a mean of 50 preoperatively (32 to 68) to a mean of 93 postoperatively (76 to 100; p < 0.001). Conclusion A cemented posterior-stabilized TKA has an 88% ten-year survivorship with revision for any reason as the endpoint. No femoral component was revised for aseptic loosening. Patients under the age of 50 years have a greater risk of revision. The clinical outcome was significantly improved but balancing the knee was challenging in 13% of TKAs requiring VVC. Overall, 10% of TKAs needed an MUA, and 6% of TKAs were revised for instability. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:660–666.

Navigation-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty for a Valgus Knee Improves Limb and Femoral Component Alignment

Orthopedics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. e253-e259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Sahn Lee ◽  
Kyeu-Back Kwon ◽  
Yong-In Lee ◽  
Young-Wan Moon
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Component ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Valgus Knee ◽  
Component Alignment ◽  
Total Knee

Gap measurement in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty with or without a trial femoral component

2014 ◽  
Vol 134 (6) ◽  
pp. 861-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiju Hayashi ◽  
Yuji Murakami ◽  
Hiroyuki Inoue ◽  
Hiroo Nobutou ◽  
Koji Nishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Component ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Posterior Stabilized ◽  
Gap Measurement ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Retraction Note: Effect of sagittal femoral component alignment on biomechanics after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Gon Koh ◽  
Jin-Ah Lee ◽  
Hwa-Yong Lee ◽  
Dong-Suk Suh ◽  
Hyo-Jeong Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Component ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Mobile Bearing ◽  
Component Alignment ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Retraction Notice

This article has been retracted. Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1458-5.

scholarly journals The unicompartmental knee is the preferred side in individuals with both a unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 3193-3199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anatole Vilhelm Wiik ◽  
Dinesh Nathwani ◽  
Ahsan Akhtar ◽  
Bilal Al-Obaidi ◽  
Robin Strachan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Component ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Coronal Alignment ◽  
Component Alignment ◽  
Posterior Slope ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Purpose To determine the preferred knee in patients with both one total and one unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Method Patients simply with a unicompartmental (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on contralateral sides were retrospectively screened from three senior knee surgeon’s logs over a 15 year period. Patients safe and free from other diseases to affect gait were approached. A total of 16 patients (mean age 70 ± 8) agreed to ground reaction force testing on an instrumented treadmill at a fair pace and incline. A gender-ratio identical group of 16 healthy control subjects (mean age 67 ± 10) and 16 patients with ipsilateral medial knee OA (mean age 66 ± 7) were analysed to compare. Results Radiographically the mode preoperative Kellgren–Lawrence knee grade for each side was 3. Postoperatively, the TKA side had a mean coronal femoral component alignment of 7° and a mean tibial coronal alignment of 89° with a mean posterior slope of 5° in the sagittal plane. The UKA side had a mean coronal femoral component alignment of 7° and a mean tibial coronal alignment of 86° with a mean posterior slope of 4° in the sagittal plane. In 7 patients, the TKA was the first procedure, while 6 for the UKA and 3 done simultaneously. Gait analysis demonstrated in both walking conditions the UKA limb was the preferred side through all phases of loading (p < 0.05) and nearer to normal than the TKA limb when compared to healthy controls and patients with knee OA. The greatest difference was observed between the transition of weight acceptance and midstance (p = 0.008), when 22% more load was taken by the UKA side. Conclusion By using a dynamic metric of an everyday activity, a distinct gait difference between differing arthroplasty types were established. A more natural loading pattern can be achieved with unicompartmentals as compared to total knees. Level of evidence Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Early Aseptic Loosening with Increased Presence and Severity of Backside Burnishing in the Optetrak Logic Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Femoral Component

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael-Alexander Malahias ◽  
David A. Iacobelli ◽  
Lisa Torres ◽  
Carolena Rojas Marcos ◽  
Allina A. Nocon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Femoral Component ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Posterior Stabilized ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Group B ◽  
Severe Degree

AbstractConcerns persist that the Optetrak Logic posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) femoral component might correlate with early failures due to aseptic loosening. The primary aim of this study was to examine if the use of the Optetrak Logic PS femoral component is associated with early (<5 years) and more extensive aseptic loosening compared with other PS femoral components. This is a single-institution retrieval analysis and revision registry study (based on prospectively collected data) of 27 failed primary PS TKA patients with loose femoral components that underwent revision TKAs between 2016 and 2019. Patients were stratified by components type: Group A (n = 16) received the Optetrak Logic PS femoral component, while Group B (n = 11) received other PS femoral components. Burnishing (macroscopic polishing of the component's backside) was observed and graded as a marker for relative motion at the cement-implant interface. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the baseline demographic, radiographic, and clinical characteristics. Mean length of implantation for Group A (3.8 ± 2.9 years) was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) than that of Group B (12.0 ± 6.7 years). A significant difference (p = 0.009) was found in presence of backside femoral burnishing between Group A (15 of 16 patients; 93.8%) and group B (5 of 11 patients; 45.6%). Furthermore, we found a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the severity of burnishing between Group A (13 of 16 patients with severe degree of burnishing; 81.3%) and Group B (1 of 11 patients with severe degree of burnishing; 9.1%). In contrast to Group B, a distinctive macroscopic pattern found in Logic retrieved femoral components (Group A) was the total absence of cement in the backside surface. The use of the Optetrak Logic PS TKA femoral component was associated with early aseptic loosening and increased presence and severity of backside burnishing with early cement-implant interface debonding compared with other commercially available types of PS TKA femoral components. The earlier failure rate with this implant is of concern.

Higher Component Malposition Rates with Patient-Specific Cruciate Retaining TKA than Contemporary Posterior Stabilized TKA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prakrit Kumar ◽  
Jacob Elfrink ◽  
James P. Daniels ◽  
Ajay Aggarwal ◽  
James A. Keeney
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Demographic Characteristics ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Posterior Stabilized ◽  
Component Alignment ◽  
Cruciate Retaining ◽  
Femoral Notching ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractCustomized individually manufactured total knee arthroplasty (CIM-TKA) was developed to improve kinematic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performance. Component placement accuracy may influence the success of CIM-TKA designs. We performed this study to compare radiographic component alignment and revision rates of a cruciate retaining (CR) CIM-TKA and a contemporary posterior stabilized TKA (PS-TKA). After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, we identified 94 CR CIM-TKAs (76 patients) and 91 PS-TKAs (82 patients) performed between July 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014 with a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 41.1 months, range 24–59 months). We performed a retrospective electronic medical record review to identify patient demographic characteristics and revision procedures performed. Postoperative plain radiographs were reviewed to assess component alignment including cruciate ligament imbalance, femoral overhang, and femoral notching. Demographic characteristics, component malalignment, and revision surgery rates were assessed using a student's t-test or two-tailed Fisher's exact test, with a p-value < 0.05 designating significance. Technical errors were more commonly identified with CR CIM-TKA (29.8 vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001), including higher rates of tibiofemoral instability (13.8 vs. 1.1%, p < 0.01), femoral notching (12.8 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.03), and patellofemoral malalignment (20.2 vs. 7.7%, p = 0.02). CR CIM-TKA had more frequent coronal plane malposition (26.6 vs. 9.9%, p < 0.01) or sagittal plane reconstruction > 3 degrees outside of an optimized range (20.2 vs. 9.9%, p = 0.06). Aseptic revisions occurred more frequently with the CR CIM-TKA design (9.6 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.13). Demographic characteristics were not significantly different between the treatment groups. CR CIM-TKA may improve kinematic performance for patients undergoing knee replacement surgery. However, our study observations suggest that careful attention to surgical technique is important for optimizing implant survivorship with the CR CIM-TKA design. Additional study is needed to determine whether higher revision rates identified during this study are related to patient selection, surgical technique, or implant design.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document