Navigation-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty for a Valgus Knee Improves Limb and Femoral Component Alignment

Abstract Purpose To determine the preferred knee in patients with both one total and one unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Method Patients simply with a unicompartmental (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on contralateral sides were retrospectively screened from three senior knee surgeon’s logs over a 15 year period. Patients safe and free from other diseases to affect gait were approached. A total of 16 patients (mean age 70 ± 8) agreed to ground reaction force testing on an instrumented treadmill at a fair pace and incline. A gender-ratio identical group of 16 healthy control subjects (mean age 67 ± 10) and 16 patients with ipsilateral medial knee OA (mean age 66 ± 7) were analysed to compare. Results Radiographically the mode preoperative Kellgren–Lawrence knee grade for each side was 3. Postoperatively, the TKA side had a mean coronal femoral component alignment of 7° and a mean tibial coronal alignment of 89° with a mean posterior slope of 5° in the sagittal plane. The UKA side had a mean coronal femoral component alignment of 7° and a mean tibial coronal alignment of 86° with a mean posterior slope of 4° in the sagittal plane. In 7 patients, the TKA was the first procedure, while 6 for the UKA and 3 done simultaneously. Gait analysis demonstrated in both walking conditions the UKA limb was the preferred side through all phases of loading (p < 0.05) and nearer to normal than the TKA limb when compared to healthy controls and patients with knee OA. The greatest difference was observed between the transition of weight acceptance and midstance (p = 0.008), when 22% more load was taken by the UKA side. Conclusion By using a dynamic metric of an everyday activity, a distinct gait difference between differing arthroplasty types were established. A more natural loading pattern can be achieved with unicompartmentals as compared to total knees. Level of evidence Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Download Full-text

Use of Shorter Intramedullary Guide for Ipsilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty following Prior Total Hip Arthroplasty

The Journal of Knee Surgery ◽

10.1055/s-0037-1603796 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 31 (04) ◽

pp. 348-351 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Bradley Webb ◽

Slif Ulrich ◽

Kenneth MacKinlay ◽

Langan Smith ◽

Arthur Malkani

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Femoral Component ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Limb Alignment ◽

Component Alignment ◽

Total Hip ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Total Knee

AbstractAlignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) plays an important role with respect to patient satisfaction and implant survivorship. In patients undergoing ipsilateral TKA with prior total hip arthroplasty (THA), the femoral intramedullary (IM) guide cannot be fully inserted into the femoral canal because of the prior THA. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of femoral component alignment using a shorter IM guide during TKA in patients with an ipsilateral THA. We identified 42 patients undergoing ipsilateral TKA with the use of a short IM guide in the setting of a prior THA. A matched cohort group was identified from our total joint registry that included 42 patients who underwent primary TKA. The surgical goal was to achieve 5 degrees of valgus on the femoral side and 0 degree on the tibial side with an overall postoperative tibial–femoral angle of 5 degrees of valgus. Patients were evaluated clinically using Knee Society pain scores (KSSs), function scores, and with radiography. Both the tibial–femoral limb alignment and the femoral component alignment were compared using Student's t-test. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to sex, age, body mass index (BMI), pre- and postoperative KSSs. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to radiographic tibial–femoral limb alignment, 4.33 degrees of valgus in the short stem THA–TKA group versus 5.4 degrees of valgus in the TKA group (p < 0.04); however, this difference did not correlate to a difference in postoperative outcomes. An adequate tibial–femoral component alignment was achieved in patients undergoing ipsilateral TKA with prior THA using a shortened IM femoral guide.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Extramedullary Femoral Component Alignment Guide System for Blood Saving after Total Knee Arthroplasty

Knee Surgery and Related Research ◽

10.5792/ksrr.2012.24.2.99 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 24 (2) ◽

pp. 99-103 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Suk Ha Jeon ◽

Ji Hun Kim ◽

Jung Myung Lee PhD ◽

Eun Seok Seo

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Femoral Component ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Component Alignment ◽

Guide System ◽

Total Knee ◽

Alignment Guide

Download Full-text

Isolated Liner Revision for Total Knee Arthroplasty Instability: A Road That Should Remain Less Taken

The Journal of Knee Surgery ◽

10.1055/s-0040-1721091 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Jason D. Tegethoff ◽

Rafael Walker-Santiago ◽

William M. Ralston ◽

James A. Keeney

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Femoral Component ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

P Value ◽

Surgical Morbidity ◽

Exact Test ◽

Total Knee ◽

Component Revision

AbstractIsolated polyethylene liner exchange (IPLE) is infrequently selected as a treatment approach for patients with primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prosthetic joint instability. Potential advantages of less immediate surgical morbidity, faster recovery, and lower procedural cost need to be measured against reoperation and re-revision risk. Few published studies have directly compared IPLE with combined tibial and femoral component revision to treat patients with primary TKA instability. After obtaining institutional review board (IRB) approval, we performed a retrospective comparison of 20 patients treated with IPLE and 126 patients treated with tibial and femoral component revisions at a single institution between 2011 and 2018. Patient demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, time to initial revision TKA, and reoperation (90 days, <2 years, and >2 years) were assessed using paired Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test with a p-value <0.01 used to determine significance. Patients undergoing IPLE were more likely to undergo reoperation (60.0 vs. 17.5%, p = 0.001), component revision surgery (45.0 vs. 8.7%, p = 0.002), and component revision within 2 years (30.0 vs. 1.6%, p < 0.0001). Differences in 90-day reoperation (p = 0.14) and revision >2 years (p = 0.19) were not significant. Reoperation for instability (30.0 vs. 4.0%, p < 0.001) and infection (20.0 vs. 1.6%, p < 0.01) were both higher in the IPLE group. IPLE does not provide consistent benefits for patients undergoing TKA revision for instability. Considerations for lower immediate postoperative morbidity and cost need to be carefully measured against long-term consequences of reoperation, delayed component revision, and increased long-term costs of multiple surgical procedures. This is a level III, case–control study.

Download Full-text