scholarly journals Effectiveness, safety, and cost–utility of a knee brace in medial knee osteoarthritis: the ERGONOMIE randomized controlled trial

Author(s):  
M. Gueugnon ◽  
I. Fournel ◽  
A.-L. Soilly ◽  
A. Diaz ◽  
E. Baulot ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Muhibbah Fatati ◽  
◽  
Setyo Sri Rahardjo ◽  
Hanung Prasetya ◽  
◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background: The increase in rates of knee replacement for osteoarthritis has made the identification of effective nonsurgical treatments a high priority. One type of treatment for medial knee osteoarthritis involves reducing medial loading to ease the physical stress applied to that compartment of the joint. The wedge is placed under the sole of the foot and angulated so that it is thicker over the lateral than the medial edge, transferring loading during weight bearing from the medial to the lateral knee compartment. This study aimed to investigate the effect of lateral wedge insole uptake in reducing pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Subjects and Method: A meta-analysis and systematic review conducted by search published articles from PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Mendeley, and Clinical key databases. Keywords used “Lateral Wedge Insole” OR “Insole” AND “Foot Orthosis “AND “osteoarthritis” AND “patellofemoral osteoarthritis” AND “knee pain” AND “medial knee osteoarthritis “AND” effect lateral wedge insole for osteoarthritis” AND “randomized controlled trial”. The inclusion criteria were full text, using randomized controlled trial (RCT) study design, and reporting effect size (mean and standard deviation). The intervention was lateral wedge insole with comparison non lateral wedge insole. The study outcome was pain. The data were analyzed by Revman 5.3. Results: 6 studies were met the inclusion criteria. This study showed that the use of lateral wedge insole reduced pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis (Mean Difference= -0.17; 95% CI= -0.51 to 0.18; p= 0.340) with heterogeneity I2= 77%. Conclusion: Lateral wedge insole use reduced pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Keywords: knee osteoarthritis, lateral wedge insole, randomized control trial Correspondence: Muhibbah Fatati, Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: [email protected]. Mobile: 089633466598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/the7thicph.05.45


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 512-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Aurélio Nemitalla Added ◽  
Caroline Added ◽  
Karina Tamy Kasawara ◽  
Viviane Perez Rotta ◽  
Diego Galace de Freitas

The objective of this study was to observe the immediate effect of a knee brace with a patellar hole versus without a patellar hole on pain perception in patients with knee osteoarthritis. To accomplish this, a double-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolled 108 patients divided into two groups (knee brace with a patellar hole or without a patellar hole). Patients were evaluated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in order to measure their pain sensation, the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test was used to evaluate their ability to walk, and the 8-m walking test (8MWT) was used to estimate their walking speed. Both groups presented significant reduction in pain perception, higher function of the lower extremities, and greater mobility while wearing a knee brace. However, the patients who wore a knee brace without a patellar hole presented more favorable results than those who wore a knee brace with a patellar hole: a 1.6-point reduction was found versus 1.1 points in the VAS, the patients presented 0.7 s less time versus 0.4 s in the TUG, and the speed was reduced by 1.4 s versus 0.8 s in the 8MWT. Therefore, the knee brace without a patellar hole presented more favorable results when compared with the knee brace with a patellar hole.


2021 ◽  
pp. 026921552199363
Author(s):  
Martin Schwarze ◽  
Leonie P Bartsch ◽  
Julia Block ◽  
Merkur Alimusaj ◽  
Ayham Jaber ◽  
...  

Objective: To compare biomechanical and clinical outcome of laterally wedged insoles (LWI) and an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Design: Single-centre, block-randomized, cross-over controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient clinic. Subjects: About 39 patients with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis. Interventions: Patients started with either LWI or AFO, determined randomly, and six weeks later changed to the alternative. Main measures: Change in the 1st maximum of external knee adduction moment (eKAM) was assessed with gait analysis. Additional outcomes were other kinetic and kinematic changes and the patient-reported outcomes EQ-5D-5L, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), American Knee Society Clinical Rating System (AKSS), Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire – Osteoarthritis and knee pain. Results: Mean age (SD) of the study population was 58 (8) years, mean BMI 30 (5). Both aids significantly improved OKS (LWI P = 0.003, AFO P = 0.001), AKSS Knee Score (LWI P = 0.01, AFO P = 0.004) and EQ-5D-5L Index (LWI P = 0.001, AFO P = 0.002). AFO reduced the 1st maximum of eKAM by 18% ( P < 0.001). The LWI reduced both maxima by 6% ( P = 0.02, P = 0.03). Both AFO and LWI reduced the knee adduction angular impulse (KAAI) by 11% ( P < 0.001) and 5% ( P = 0.05) respectively. The eKAM (1st maximum) and KAAI reduction was significantly larger with AFO than with LWI ( P = 0.001, P = 0.004). Conclusions: AFO reduces medial knee load more than LWI. Nevertheless, no clinical superiority of either of the two aids could be shown.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document