scholarly journals Distal Tibia Metaphyseal Fractures: Which is Better, Intra-medullary Nailing or Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis?

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-71
Author(s):  
Kawalkar Abhijit Chandrakant ◽  
Badole Chandrashekher Martand

Introduction Tibia fractures are the most common long bone fractures encountered by the orthopedic surgeons and distal tibia fractures have the second highest incidence of all tibia fractures after the middle third of tibia the distal tibial fractures are unique and are considered as most challenging fractures to treat due to its proximity to the ankle joint and its superficial nature. The objective of this study is to compare two osteosynthesis systems developed for surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures: the intramedullary nailing and the MIPPO technique. Methods The study was conducted between Jan 2011 to Dec 2012. 63 patients with extra-articular distal tibia fracture treated with intramedullary nailing and MIPPO technique were reviewed retrospectively and clinical outcome was evaluated according to American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score. Results 31 patients were treated with intramedullary nail & 32 with MIPPO technique. Fibular fixation was done in cases where fibular fracture was at or below the level of tibial fractures. We found no difference in terms of time for fracture union, mal-union, non-union, duration of surgery and amount of blood loss. But there was significant difference in terms of infection and duration of hospital stay. Also weight bearing was possible much earlier in intramedullary group as compared to the MIPPO group. Conclusion Thus we conclude that intramedullary nailing is better choice of implant in patients with extra- articular distal tibia fractures & helps in early weight bearing and ambulation of patient with fewer complications.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-37
Author(s):  
Md Asjadur Rahman ◽  
Md Shahidullah Kaiser ◽  
SM Roknuzzaman ◽  
Nadim Ahmed

Introduction: Tibia fractures are the most common long bone fractures encountered by the orthopedic surgeons and distal tibia fractures have the second highest incidence of all tibia fractures after the middle third of tibia the distal tibial fractures are unique and are considered as most challenging fractures to treat due to its proximity to the ankle joint and its superficial nature. The objective of this study is to compare two osteosynthesis systems developed for surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures: the intramedullary nailing and the MIPO technique. Methods: The study was conducted between Jan 2018 to Dec 2019. 30 patients with extraarticular distal tibia fracture treated with intramedullary nailing and MIPO technique were reviewed retrospectively and clinical outcome was evaluated according to American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score. Results: 15 patients were treated with intramedullary nail and 15 with MIPO technique. Fibular fixation was done in cases where fibular fracture was at or below the level of tibial fractures. We found no difference in terms of time for fracture union, mal-union, non-union, duration of surgery and amount of blood loss. But there was significant difference in terms of infection and duration of hospital stay. Also weight bearing was possible much earlier in intramedullary group as compared to the MIPO group. Conclusion: Thus we conclude that intramedullary nailing is better choice of implant in patients with extra- articular distal tibia fractures and helps in early weight bearing and ambulation of patient with fewer complications. J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll, December 2020, Vol.12(1); 33-37


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0031
Author(s):  
Gi-Soo Lee ◽  
Jaehwang Song ◽  
Chan Kang

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Restoration of normal anatomic alignment is most important aspect of the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for tibia fracture. The purpose of this study was to verify the usefulness of ultrasonography of MIPO in tibia fractures. Methods: Of the tibia fracture patients were admitted to the emergency department patients who plan to MIPO surgery were enrolled. We measured maximum angular formation in posteromedial and anterior edge of tibia using ultrasonography (US). And then, we measured maximum angular formation using mobile C-arm images after closed reduction in operating room. The accuracy was measured and compared using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). Results: There was no significant difference in accuracy between C-arm and US. However, the use of C-arm during surgery was reduced by using US. By using US, we could determine that the reduction is adequate without the lateral and oblique C-arm images. Conclusion: The use of US is useful in reduction for tibia fracture. It seems that US is effective for confirmation of reduction state and considered safe and non-invasive because it can reduce the radiation exposure by using C-arm.


Author(s):  
Yashavantha Kumar C. ◽  
Shivaprasad M. S. ◽  
Trilok V.

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Distal tibia shaft fractures pose significant challenge to treating surgeons. Giving more importance to anatomical reduction and ignoring often injured soft tissues has led to poor outcomes and high complication rates. Although multiple options are described to treat these fractures, there is no consensus on the best method of treatment. We hereby want to study the results of distal tibia fractures treated by expert tibia nailing and distal tibia plating.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This study was undertaken in patients who were operated in between January 2012 to March 2015 at M S Ramaiah Teaching Hospital, which is a tertiary care hospital in Bangalore. Study included 52 patients with distal tibia fracture treated by surgery. All the fractures were closed distal diaphyseal fractures without articular involvement. Thirty two patients underwent expert tibia nailing whereas 20 patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with locking plates. Patients were followed up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Fifty two patients included in study and they were divided into two groups as nailing group and plating group. Plating group included 20 patients whereas nailing group included 32 patients. The mode of injury was  road traffic injury in 32 cases , followed by self-fall in 17 cases and sports related injury in 3 cases. Distal tibia fracture was associated with in 29 patients (87%) of nailing group whereas in 17 patients (80) of plating group. Average distance of fracture from pilon was 6 cm in nailing group and 3cm in plating group.  The average duration of surgery in nailing was  group  was 88 minutes (range, 65-130 minutes) whereas average duration of surgery in  plating group was group  was 92 minutes (range, 70-130 minutes).  The average time for union was 16 weeks for nailing group and for plating group it was 18 weeks.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Both intramedullary nailing and plating are the optimal methods of treatment. Plating is preferred in cases where fracture is close to pilon whereas intramedullary nailing is preferred for fractures away from tibial pilon. There is no significant difference between union and complication rates.</p>


Author(s):  
Prashant Kamble ◽  
Nandan Marathe ◽  
Sudhir Sharan ◽  
Ayush Sharma ◽  
Ashwin Sathe ◽  
...  

<p class="Body"><strong>Background : </strong>Distal tibia fractures or pilon fractures are usually the result of combined compressive and shearing forces, which may lead to instability of the metaphysis. Poor vascularity, lack of muscle cover and frequent intra-articular extension often make these fractures very challenging to manage. There are plenty of options available to treat a distal tibia fracture which includes intramedullary nailing, external fixation, open reduction and internal fixation and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO). The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of MIPO with respect to the healing of fracture site, the incidences of complications and to conclude whether MIPO circumvents the problems of formal open reduction and fixation with other implants.</p><p class="Body"><strong>Methods: </strong>A series of forty patients with fracture of the distal tibia on preoperative X-rays were treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using pre-contoured locking plates from June 2014 to October 2018 and followed up at regular intervals with X-rays and monitoring for complications.</p><p class="Body"><strong>Result: </strong>The functional scores were evaluated using Teeny and Wiss clinical rating system for ankle joints. Thirty-two patients had an ‘Excellent’ or ‘Good’ outcome. One patient was diagnosed with a soft tissue complication and delayed union and 3 patients were diagnosed with malunion without significant functional disability at follow up. <strong></strong></p><p class="Body"><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with pre-contoured locking plates is associated with high union rate and good functional outcomes. It is an effective treatment modality for distal tibia fractures.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document