Reliability evaluation of the Bath Adolescent Pain – Parental Impact Questionnaire (BAP-PIQ) in a US–based clinical population

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. P17
Author(s):  
D. Amstutz ◽  
G. Revivo ◽  
C. Gagnon
2003 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 241-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bolognini ◽  
B. Plancherel ◽  
J. Laget ◽  
P. Stéphan ◽  
O. Halfon

The aim of this study, which was carried out in the French-speacking part of Switzerland, was to examine the relationship between suicide attempts and self-mutilation by adolescents and young adults. The population, aged 14-25 years (N = 308), included a clinical sample of dependent subjects (drug abuse and eating disorders) compared to a control sample. On the basis of the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview ( Sheehan et al., 1998 ), DSM-IV criteria were used for the inclusion of the clinical population. The results concerning the occurrence of suicide attempts as well as on self-mutilation confirm most of the hypotheses postulated: suicidal attempts and self-mutilation were more common in the clinical group compared to the control group, and there was a correlation between suicide attempts and self-mutilation. However, there was only a partial overlap, attesting that suicide and self-harm might correspond to two different types of behaviour.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dubi Lufi ◽  
Shachar Pan

Abstract. Several studies have shown that Continuous Performance Tests (CPT) can diagnose Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) better than other tests. Research reporting comparisons of two or more CPT-type tests is scarce. The purpose of the study was to compare the Mathematics Continuous Performance Test (MATH-CPT) with another CPT-type test (CPT II) and a questionnaire (the Brown Scale). The comparison was carried out by looking at correlations among subscales and checking the precision of detecting ADHD. Ninety-five high school and college students participated in the study, 41 with ADHD were the research group and 54 were the control group. The participants performed the two tests and answered the questionnaire. The results showed that the MATH-CPT correctly identified 74.50% of the participants of both groups as compared to the 71.60% of the CPT II. Correlations between the two CPT-type tests were moderate; however, they were similar to correlations found in other studies comparing similar tools. The MATH-CPT, final attention formula, showed significant correlations with the Brown scales, while the CPT II, confidence index associated with ADHD assessment, showed nonsignificant correlations with the questionnaire. The study indicated that MATH-CPT can be used with a clinical population of ADHD and for research purposes.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Tsou ◽  
Sara Schleicher-Dilks ◽  
Rachel Chan ◽  
Chukwuemeka Ukpabi ◽  
Johanna Messerly ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 146 (6) ◽  
pp. 626 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.R. Castro Ferreira ◽  
P.A. Crossley ◽  
J. Goody ◽  
R.N. Allan

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 523-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su-Jeong Suh ◽  
Chang-Hyoung Lee ◽  
Young-Lae Cho ◽  
Hwa-Sun Park ◽  
Won-Pyo Lee ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Hemakumar Reddy Galiveeti ◽  
Arup Kumar Goswami ◽  
Nalin B. Dev Choudhury

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document