An Update: Institutional Quality Improvement Initiative for Pain Management for Pediatric Cancer Inpatients, 2007–2010

OBJECTIVE The inclusion of the pain management domain in the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey now ties patients' perceptions of pain and analgesia to financial reimbursement for inpatient stays. Therefore, the authors wanted to determine if a quality improvement initiative centered on a standardized analgesia protocol could significantly reduce postoperative pain among neurosurgery patients. METHODS The authors implemented a 10-month, prospective, interrupted time-series trial of a quality improvement initiative. The intervention consisted of a multimodal, interdepartmental, standardized analgesia protocol with process improvements from preadmission to discharge. All neurosurgical-floor patients participated in the quality improvement intervention, with data collected on a systematically randomly sampled subset of 96 patients for detailed analysis. Patient-reported numeric rating scale pain on the first postoperative day (POD) served as the primary outcome. RESULTS Implementation of the analgesia protocol resulted in improved preoperative and postoperative documentation of pain (p < 0.001) and improved use of multimodal analgesia, including use of NSAIDs (p < 0.009) and gabapentin (p < 0.027). This intervention also correlated with a 32% reduction in reported pain on the 1st POD for all neurosurgical patients (mean pain scale scores 4.31 vs 2.94; p = 0.000) and a 43% reduction among spinal surgery patients (mean pain scale scores 5.45 vs 3.10; p = 0.036). After controlling for covariates, implementation of the protocol was a significant predictor of lowered postoperative pain (p = 0.05) on the 1st POD. This reduction in pain correlated with protocol compliance (p = 0.028), and a significant decrease in the monthly number of naloxone doses suggests improved safety (mean dose ± SD 1.5 ± 1.0 vs 0.33 ± 0.5; p = 0.04). Furthermore, a significant and persistent reduction in the pain management component of the HCAHPS scores suggests a durability of results extending beyond the life of the study (72.1% vs 82.0%; p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS The implementation of a standardized analgesia protocol can significantly reduce postoperative pain among neurosurgical patients while increasing safety. Given the current climate of patient-centered outcomes, this study has broad implications for the continuum of care model proposed in the Affordable Care Act. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01693588 (clincaltrials.gov)

Download Full-text

Chemotherapy medication errors in a pediatric cancer treatment center: Prospective characterization of error types and frequency and development of a quality improvement initiative to lower the error rate

Pediatric Blood & Cancer ◽

10.1002/pbc.24514 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 60 (8) ◽

pp. 1320-1324 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Raymond G. Watts ◽

Kerry Parsons

Keyword(s):

Quality Improvement ◽

Cancer Treatment ◽

Medication Errors ◽

Error Rate ◽

Pediatric Cancer ◽

Treatment Center ◽

Quality Improvement Initiative ◽

Error Types

Download Full-text

Rapid design and implementation of a virtual pain management programme due to COVID-19: a quality improvement initiative

British Journal of Pain ◽

10.1177/20494637211039252 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 204946372110392

Author(s):

Deborah Williams ◽

Gregory Booth ◽

Helen Cohen ◽

Anthony Gilbert ◽

Andrew Lucas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Improvement ◽

Pain Management ◽

Musculoskeletal Pain ◽

Patient Involvement ◽

Negative Impact ◽

Hospital Setting ◽

Management Programme ◽

Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain ◽

Quality Improvement Initiative ◽

Face To Face

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted the delivery of face-to-face pain services including pain management programmes in the United Kingdom with considerable negative impact on patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. We aimed to develop and implement a remotely delivered pain management programme (PMP) using video-conferencing technology that contains all the core components of a full programme: the ‘virtual PMP’ (vPMP). By reporting on the process of this development, we endeavour to help address the paucity of literature on the development of remote pain management programmes. Methods: The vPMP was developed by an inter-disciplinary group of professionals as a quality improvement (QI) project. The Model for Improvement Framework was employed with patient involvement at the design phase and at subsequent improvements. Improvement was measured qualitatively with frequent and repeated qualitative data collection leading to programme change. Quantitative patient demographic comparisons were made with a patient cohort who had been on a face-to-face PMP pathway. Results: Sixty-one patients on the PMP waiting list were contacted and 43 met the criteria for the programme. Fourteen patients participated in three vPMP cycles. Patient involvement and comprehensive stakeholder consultation were essential to a robust design for the first vPMP. Continued involvement of patient partners during the QI process led to rapid resolution of implementation problems. The most prominent issues that needed action were technical challenges including training needs, participant access to physical and technological resources, participant fatigue and concerns about adequate communication and peer support. Conclusion: This report demonstrates how a remotely delivered PMP, fully in line with national guidance, was rapidly developed and implemented in a hospital setting for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. We also discuss the relevance of our findings to the issues of cost, patient experience, patient preferences and inequities of access in delivering telerehabilitation for chronic pain.

Download Full-text

HOW MANY PAIN PILLS DO WE PRESCRIBE: A SURVEY OF PARTICIPANTS IN SCORE: A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE (204)

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967121s00313 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (10_suppl5) ◽

pp. 2325967121S0031

Author(s):

Kenny Halloran ◽

Henry Ellis ◽

Philip Wilson ◽

Jennifer Beck ◽

Gregory Schmale ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Improvement ◽

Pain Management ◽

Regional Anesthesia ◽

Sports Medicine ◽

Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Knee Arthroscopy ◽

Management Strategies ◽

Invasive Procedure ◽

Quality Improvement Initiative ◽

Pediatric Sports Medicine

Objectives: The public health opioid abuse epidemic has led to nationwide interest in judicious use and close monitoring of opioid pain medication. Knee arthroscopy(KA) and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction(ACLR) are common procedures in adolescent patients for which narcotics have been historically utilized for post-operative pain management. The purpose of this study is to investigate pain management strategies following basic KA or ACLR by pediatric sports surgeons who contribute to a multi-center quality improvement initiative(SCORE). Methods: Surgeon participants in SCORE represent fifteen U.S. institutions from primarily academic teaching hospitals who specialize in pediatric sports medicine. Surgeons contribute all ACLR and other KA-related cases. A RedCap survey was distributed to all SCORE surgeon participants in December 2019. A KA (defined as a knee arthroscopy that does not include a ligament reconstruction or a cartilage procedure other than chondroplasty) represented a less invasive procedure, while the ACLR represented a more invasive procedure. Survey results were collected and analyzed for both practice patterns of regional anesthesia utilization and post-operative narcotic prescribing volumes. Results: Twenty-eight SCORE surgeon participants completed the survey, a 100% response rate. A planned prescription of a mean of 16.4 pain pills (range 0-40 pills) were reported for pain management following a KA, only 32.1% of surgeons reported adjunctive regional anesthesia techniques for this procedure in addition to general anesthesia. Following an ACLR, surgeons reported a planned prescription of a mean 23.8 pain pills (range 0-40 pills) and most (92.3%) reported utilization of regional anesthesia for their peri-operative analgesia strategy. Of those using adjunctive regional anesthesia, significant variability was reported: 30.7% reported indwelling catheter placement for peripheral nerve block following ACLR as opposed to a single shot injection method, and several block locations were reported to be utilized of which adductor canal (67.9%) block was the most common (see Figure 1). For both procedure types, variability in multi-modal pain management was noted, with incomplete adoption of the use of additional non-narcotic medication (acetaminophen, 64.2%; and NSAIDS, 75%). Cryotherapy devices were applied/prescribed in 75.0% of knee arthroscopy procedures and 92.8% of ACLR. Conclusions: Despite evidence for effective adjunctive pain management strategies, incomplete adoption of multi-modal techniques and reliance on narcotic medication remains a significant component of pediatric sports surgical practice; with on average > 15 pills prescribed following these procedures. Opportunities for reducing practice variability, adoption of multi-modal analgesia strategies, and decreasing post-operative narcotic use following common adolescent knee procedures exist for this subset of pediatric sports medicine specialists

Download Full-text