HOW MANY PAIN PILLS DO WE PRESCRIBE: A SURVEY OF PARTICIPANTS IN SCORE: A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE (204)

Objectives: The public health opioid abuse epidemic has led to nationwide interest in judicious use and close monitoring of opioid pain medication. Knee arthroscopy(KA) and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction(ACLR) are common procedures in adolescent patients for which narcotics have been historically utilized for post-operative pain management. The purpose of this study is to investigate pain management strategies following basic KA or ACLR by pediatric sports surgeons who contribute to a multi-center quality improvement initiative(SCORE). Methods: Surgeon participants in SCORE represent fifteen U.S. institutions from primarily academic teaching hospitals who specialize in pediatric sports medicine. Surgeons contribute all ACLR and other KA-related cases. A RedCap survey was distributed to all SCORE surgeon participants in December 2019. A KA (defined as a knee arthroscopy that does not include a ligament reconstruction or a cartilage procedure other than chondroplasty) represented a less invasive procedure, while the ACLR represented a more invasive procedure. Survey results were collected and analyzed for both practice patterns of regional anesthesia utilization and post-operative narcotic prescribing volumes. Results: Twenty-eight SCORE surgeon participants completed the survey, a 100% response rate. A planned prescription of a mean of 16.4 pain pills (range 0-40 pills) were reported for pain management following a KA, only 32.1% of surgeons reported adjunctive regional anesthesia techniques for this procedure in addition to general anesthesia. Following an ACLR, surgeons reported a planned prescription of a mean 23.8 pain pills (range 0-40 pills) and most (92.3%) reported utilization of regional anesthesia for their peri-operative analgesia strategy. Of those using adjunctive regional anesthesia, significant variability was reported: 30.7% reported indwelling catheter placement for peripheral nerve block following ACLR as opposed to a single shot injection method, and several block locations were reported to be utilized of which adductor canal (67.9%) block was the most common (see Figure 1). For both procedure types, variability in multi-modal pain management was noted, with incomplete adoption of the use of additional non-narcotic medication (acetaminophen, 64.2%; and NSAIDS, 75%). Cryotherapy devices were applied/prescribed in 75.0% of knee arthroscopy procedures and 92.8% of ACLR. Conclusions: Despite evidence for effective adjunctive pain management strategies, incomplete adoption of multi-modal techniques and reliance on narcotic medication remains a significant component of pediatric sports surgical practice; with on average > 15 pills prescribed following these procedures. Opportunities for reducing practice variability, adoption of multi-modal analgesia strategies, and decreasing post-operative narcotic use following common adolescent knee procedures exist for this subset of pediatric sports medicine specialists

Treatment Decisions in Pediatric Sports Medicine: Do Personal and Professional Bias Affect Decision-Making?

Background: Personal and professional biases can affect decision-making regarding important issues in pediatric sports medicine. Gaining insight into the opinions of health care professionals who specialize in pediatric sports medicine will provide information that may be useful for directing ongoing research in this field. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that surgeons would demonstrate bias toward early surgical intervention versus nonsurgeons. In addition, it was hypothesized that youth sports medicine professionals who were parents of a child with a previous major sports injury or concussion would be less likely to allow their child to play American tackle football or return to football after a concussion. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: An online survey was provided to the active members of the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine Society. We used both professional background information and responses to questions related to personal experiences with youth sports injuries to determine potential factors associated with underlying biases. Survey responses among subgroups were compared using the Fisher exact test. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate years in practice versus opioid use. Results: Of the survey participants, 62.5% were pediatric surgeons, and 37.5% represented different nonsurgical youth sports medicine professions. Surgeons were less likely than nonsurgeons to agree to allow their child to return to football after sustaining a concussion and completing a concussion protocol (48% vs 76%, P = .013). Surgeons were more likely than nonsurgeons to agree to both elective shoulder stabilization after a first-time dislocation and elective drilling of a stable knee osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) before nonoperative treatment (41% vs 10%, P = .003 and 52% vs 23%, P = .013, respectively). Those who reported having a child with a concussion history were more likely to support him or her returning to football after a concussion (65% vs 33%, P = .026). Conclusion: Surgeons were more likely to favor elective shoulder-stabilization surgery after a first-time dislocation and drilling of a stable knee OCD instead of nonoperative management. Personal experience of having a child who sustained a major sports injury or concussion did not demonstrate a bias against participation in football or return to football after a concussion.

A Scale Measuring Academic-Related Anxiety Following Concussion

Does academic-related anxiety contribute to an adolescent’s recovery process and return to activity after experiencing a concussion? The authors created a novel measure of academic-related anxiety (Mularoni Measure of Academic Anxiety following Concussion [MMAAC]) and administered it to adolescents following concussion in outpatient pediatric sports medicine clinics. Two previously validated measures of anxiety were also administered, and results were compared with the MMAAC scores as well as the lengths of time for return to school and sports. Results show that higher MMAAC scores positively correlate with the length of time an adolescent needs to return to school. Study results indicate that the MMAAC reliably measures academic-related anxiety in adolescents suffering from concussions and can be helpful in predicting a basic timetable for return to school. The authors believe that this brief survey can be used by physicians in clinic to evaluate anxiety and assist with return to school expectations to provide comprehensive recovery support.