Prognostic Factors in Patients with Advanced Cancer After Palliative Urinary Diversion (S703)

PurposeTo offer evidence-based clinical recommendations concerning prognosis in advanced cancer patients.MethodsA Working Group of the Research Network of the European Association for Palliative Care identified clinically significant topics, reviewed the studies, and assigned the level of evidence. A formal meta-analysis was not feasible because of the heterogeneity of published studies and the lack of minimal standards in reporting results. A systematic electronic literature search within the main available medical literature databases was performed for each of the following four areas identified: clinical prediction of survival (CPS), biologic factors, clinical signs and symptoms and psychosocial variables, and prognostic scores. Only studies on patients with advanced cancer and survival ≤ 90 days were included.ResultsA total of 38 studies were evaluated. Level A evidence-based recommendations of prognostic correlation could be formulated for CPS (albeit with a series of limitations of which clinicians must be aware) and prognostic scores. Recommendations on the use of other prognostic factors, such as performance status, symptoms associated with cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (weight loss, anorexia, dysphagia, and xerostomia), dyspnea, delirium, and some biologic factors (leukocytosis, lymphocytopenia, and C-reactive protein), reached level B.ConclusionPrognostication of life expectancy is a significant clinical commitment for clinicians involved in oncology and palliative care. More accurate prognostication is feasible and can be achieved by combining clinical experience and evidence from the literature. Using and communicating prognostic information should be part of a multidisciplinary palliative care approach.

Download Full-text

QTc interval in advanced cancer patients

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e20658 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e20658-e20658

Author(s):

D. Trivanovic ◽

R. Dobrila-Dintinjana ◽

Z. Mavric ◽

D. Stimac ◽

M. Petkovic

Keyword(s):

Prognostic Factors ◽

Advanced Cancer ◽

Median Survival ◽

Cardiac Disease ◽

Group Performance ◽

Performance Status ◽

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽

Solid Cancer ◽

Qtc Interval ◽

One Year

e20658 Background: The purpose is to identify prognostic factors that may have impact on survival in patients with advanced cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who had biopsy proven advanced solid cancer disease in stage IV and no history or evidence of any prior cardiac disease. Univariate and multivariate stepwise Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were performed to identify independent predictors of one year survival. Results: Between 1/01 and 9/05, 143 patients (83 male and 60 female) with advanced cancers were evaluated in our institution. The primary site of disease was lung (28%), pancreas (19%), colon (15%), rectum (13%), breast (12%), and other (13%). The median follow-up was 12,5 months, median overall survival (OS) was 8.1 months, and 1-year OS rate was 62%. Median age was 65 years. OS was significantly related to the following pre-treatment prognostic factors: Age ≥65 (years), anaemia (hemoglobin level <13.2 g/dl), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0–1, and prolonged QTc interval in electrocardiogram (ECG). However, multivariate analysis revealed only prolonged QTc as independent prognostic parameter with 1-y survival status. Using 440 ms as the cut off value, the QTc interval was prolonged in 32 patients (22%) with median survival of 45 days and normal in 111 patients (78%) with median survival of 280 days. During the one-year 25 patients (78%) died in group with prolonged QTc interval while in group with normal QTc interval died 63 patients (57%). Conclusions: The results of our study indicate that a prolonged QTc interval (> 440 ms) is an adverse prognostic sign in patients with advanced cancer and without cardiac disease which correlates with increased mortality rates within one year after the diagnosis. Our findings suggest that QTc prolongation may be a good adjunct in risk stratification of patients with advanced cancer who are being considered for aggressive treatment regimens. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text