scholarly journals A Rapid Qualitative Synthesis of Insights from the Veterans Administration Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI) National Implementation (QI703)

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 457
Author(s):  
Cati Brown-Johnson ◽  
Natalie Lo ◽  
Karleen Giannitrapani ◽  
Jill Lowery ◽  
Mary Beth Foglia ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 752-752
Author(s):  
Mary Ersek ◽  
Winifred Scott ◽  
Joan Carpenter ◽  
Jennifer Kononowech ◽  
Ciarian Phibbs ◽  
...  

Abstract This retrospective observational study describes the first 20 months of implementing the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative. We examined patient and facility characteristics associated with life sustaining treatment (LST) orders template completion, including the association between template completion and the Care Assessment Need (CAN) score, which quantifies Veterans’ risk of hospitalization and mortality. As of February 29, 2020, over 274,200 Veterans received at least one goal of care conversation and LST preferences documented on a template. Eighty-two percent of deceased Veterans with the highest risk of hospitalization or mortality had an LST note and order documented prior to their death. Factors that predicted a greater likelihood of LST template completion included higher CAN score, older age, nursing home stay, and being white non-Hispanic. Findings suggest that clinicians are engaging older, sicker veterans in goals of care conversations. Research is needed to understand potential disparities in LST template completion.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-76
Author(s):  
Karleen F. Giannitrapani ◽  
Anne M. Walling ◽  
Ariadna Garcia ◽  
MaryBeth Foglia ◽  
Jill S. Lowery ◽  
...  

Background: Prior to national spread, the Department of Veterans Affairs implemented a pilot of the life-sustaining treatment decisions initiative (LSTDI) to promote proactive goals of care conversations (GoCC) with seriously ill patients, including policy and practice standards, an electronic documentation template and order set, and implementation support. Aim: To describe a 2-year pilot of the LSTDI at 4 demonstration sites. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting/Participants: A total of 6664 patients who had at least one GoCC. Results: Descriptive statistics characterized patient demographics, goals of care, LST decisions, and risk of hospitalization or mortality among patients with at least one GoCC. Participants were on average 71.4 years old, 93.2% male, 87.1% white, and 64.7% urban; 27.3% died by the end of the pilot period. Fifteen percent lacked decision-making capacity (DMC). Nonmutually exclusive goals included to be cured (7.6%), to prolong life (34%), to improve/maintain quality of life (61.5%), to be comfortable (53%), to obtain support for family/caregiver (8.4%), to achieve life goals (2.1%), and other (10.5%). Many GoCCs resulted in a do not resuscitate (DNR) order (58.8%). Patients without DMC were more likely to have comfort-oriented goals (77.3% vs 48.8%) and a DNR (84% vs 52.6%). Chart abstraction supported content validity of GoCC documentation. Conclusion: The pilot demonstrated that standardizing practices for eliciting and documenting GoCCs resulted in customized documentation of goals of care and LST decisions of a large number of seriously ill patients and established the feasibility of spreading standardized practices throughout a large integrated health care system.


2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 28-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lissi Hansen ◽  
Patricia G Archbold ◽  
Barbara Stewart ◽  
Una Beth Westfall ◽  
Linda Ganzini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document