Advance Care Planning and Intensity of Care at the End of Life for Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease and Congestive Heart Failure (RP302)

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 200-201
Author(s):  
Gwen Bernacki ◽  
Cara McDermott ◽  
Ruth Engelberg ◽  
J. Randall Curtis
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Congestive Heart Failure ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Intensity Of Care ◽  
Advance Care

scholarly journals The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 874-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Schichtel ◽  
Bee Wee ◽  
Rafael Perera ◽  
Igho Onakpoya
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advance Care

Abstract Background Advance care planning is widely advocated to improve outcomes in end-of-life care for patients suffering from heart failure. But until now, there has been no systematic evaluation of the impact of advance care planning (ACP) on clinical outcomes. Our aim was to determine the effect of ACP in heart failure through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods We searched CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, Science Citation Index and PsycINFO (inception to July 2018). We selected RCTs including adult patients with heart failure treated in a hospital, hospice or community setting. Three reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias (Cochrane risk of bias tool) and evaluated the quality of evidence (GRADE tool) and analysed interventions according to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). We calculated standardized mean differences (SMD) in random effects models for pooled effects using the generic inverse variance method. Results Fourteen RCTs including 2924 participants met all of the inclusion criteria. There was a moderate effect in favour of ACP for quality of life (SMD, 0.38; 95% CI [0.09 to 0.68]), patients’ satisfaction with end-of-life care (SMD, 0.39; 95% CI [0.14 to 0.64]) and the quality of end-of-life communication (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI [0.17 to 0.42]) for patients suffering from heart failure. ACP seemed most effective if it was introduced at significant milestones in a patient’s disease trajectory, included family members, involved follow-up appointments and considered ethnic preferences. Several sensitivity analyses confirmed the statistically significant direction of effect. Heterogeneity was mainly due to different study settings, length of follow-up periods and compositions of ACP. Conclusions ACP improved quality of life, patient satisfaction with end-of-life care and the quality of end-of-life communication for patients suffering from heart failure and could be most effective when the right timing, follow-up and involvement of important others was considered.

scholarly journals Preferences on advance care planning and end‐of‐life care in patients hospitalized for heart failure

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Kitakata ◽  
Takashi Kohno ◽  
Shun Kohsaka ◽  
Daisuke Fujisawa ◽  
Naomi Nakano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advance Care

P-52 Delivering advance care planning in chronic kidney disease (CKD): The perspectives of healthcare providers

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A59.2-A59
Author(s):  
Marcus Sellars ◽  
A Tong ◽  
William Silvester ◽  
Carol Pollock ◽  
Tim Luckett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Advance Care

Variability of physician perspectives toward advance care planning for patients with incurable cancer and congestive heart failure.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
Manisha Chandar ◽  
Bruce Brockstein ◽  
Alan Zunamon ◽  
Irwin Silverman ◽  
Sarah Dlouhy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Congestive Heart Failure ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Incurable Cancer ◽  
Advance Care

12 Background: Advance Care Planning (ACP) discussions afford patients and physicians a chance to better understand patients’ values and wishes regarding end-of-life care; however these conversations typically take place late in the course of a disease, or not at all. The goal of this study was to understand attitudes of oncologists, cardiologists, and primary care physicians (PCPs) towards ACP. We also aimed to identify persistent barriers to timely ACP discussion following a quality improvement initiative at our health system aimed at improving ACP completion rate. Methods: A 23-question cross-sectional online survey was created and distributed to cardiologists, oncologists, primary care physicians and cardiology and oncology support staff at the NorthShore University Health System (NorthShore) from February-March 2015. A total of 117 individuals (46% of distributed) completed the surveys. The results were compiled using an online survey analysis tool. Results: Only 15% of cardiologists felt it was their responsibility to conduct ACP with their congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. In contrast, 68% of oncologists accepted responsibility for ACP in incurable cancer patients. Sixty-eight percent of PCPs felt personally responsible for conducting ACP discussions with CHF patients, while only 34% felt the same about cancer patients. Documentation of ACP in the electronic health record (EHR) was inconsistent among specialties. Among all surveyed specialties, lack of time was the major barrier limiting ACP discussion. Perceived patient discomfort and discomfort of the patient’s family towards these discussions were also significant reported barriers. Conclusions: Attitudes toward ACP implementation vary considerably by medical specialty and medical condition, with oncologists in this study feeling more personal responsibility for carrying out these discussions with cancer patients than cardiologists with their heart failure patients. Robust implementation of ACP across the spectrum of medical illnesses is likely to require a true collaboration between office-based PCPs and specialists in both the inpatient and ambulatory settings.

The System to Implement Advance Care Planning and Make Proxies, Advance Directives, and Portable Medical Orders Available and Actionable Across Care Settings

2020 ◽  
pp. 116-124
Author(s):  
Valerie Satkoske ◽  
Alvin H. Moss
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Comprehensive System ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Patient Will ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
The Right

Few would debate that thoughtful advance care planning conversations between providers, patients, and patients’ loved ones reflect a respect for the right to direct one’s end-of-life care based upon personal values, preferences, and goals. Previous research suggests that advance directives and medical orders are the vehicles to enable patient wishes to be known. However, without ensuring clinician access to those documents, the chances that a patient will receive the desired level of treatment at the end of life diminish significantly. This chapter explores the impediments to accessing and acting upon advance directives and medical orders and suggests a comprehensive system that improves access to completed advance care planning documents for providers and patients. It reviews the successes with such a system in a state—West Virginia—and the positive outcomes with employing components of the proposed system with chronic kidney disease and dialysis patients.

Perspectives of Health-Care Providers Toward Advance Care Planning in Patients With Advanced Cancer and Congestive Heart Failure

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 423-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manisha Chandar ◽  
Bruce Brockstein ◽  
Alan Zunamon ◽  
Irwin Silverman ◽  
Sarah Dlouhy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Congestive Heart Failure ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Major Barrier ◽  
Medical Diagnoses ◽  
Advance Care

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) discussions afford patients and physicians a chance to better understand patients’ values and wishes regarding end-of-life care; however, these conversations typically take place late in the course of a disease. The goal of this study was to clarify attitudes of oncologists, cardiologists, and primary care physicians (PCPs) toward ACP and to identify persistent barriers to timely ACP discussion following a quality improvement initiative at our health system geared at improvement in ACP implementation. Methods: A 20-question, cross-sectional online survey was created and distributed to cardiologists, oncologists, PCPs, and cardiology and oncology support staff at the NorthShore University HealthSystem (NorthShore) from February to March 2015. A total of 117 individuals (46% of distributed) completed the surveys. The results were compiled using an online survey analysis tool (SurveyMonkey, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA). Results: Only 15% of cardiologists felt it was their responsibility to conduct ACP discussions with their patients having congestive heart failure (CHF). In contrast, 68% of oncologists accepted this discussion as their responsibility in patients with terminal cancer ( P < .01). These views were mirrored by PCPs, as 68% of PCPs felt personally responsible for ACP discussion with patients having CHF, while only 34% felt the same about patients with cancer. Reported documentation of these discussions in the electronic health record was inconsistent between specialties. Among all surveyed specialties, lack of time was the major barrier limiting ACP discussion. Perceived patient discomfort and discomfort of the patient’s family toward these discussions were also significant reported barriers. Conclusion: Attitudes toward ACP implementation vary considerably by medical specialty and medical condition, with oncologists in this study tending to feel more personal responsibility for these discussions with patients having cancer than cardiologists with their patients having heart failure. Robust implementation of ACP across the spectrum of medical diagnoses is likely to require a true collaboration between office-based PCPs and specialists in both the inpatient and the ambulatory settings.

scholarly journals Facilators and Barriers to Advance Care Planning Engagement among Chronic Kidney Patients in Taiwan

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 777-777
Author(s):  
YuHsuan (Olivia) Wang ◽  
Susan Enguidanos
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Disease ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Advance Care

Abstract End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients experience high rates of cognitive impairment and lower quality of life at end of life. Having an advance care planning (ACP) conversation is associated with better care at end of life and improved care consistency with patient preferences. Taiwan ranks highest in ESRD and dialysis incidence worldwide, highlighting the importance of ACP among this population. Since 2019, the Patient Autonomy Act entitled Taiwanese to engage in ACP, but strategies to promote its uptake and the role of healthcare providers and caregivers in ACP conversations remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate facilitators and barriers to ACP engagment among Taiwanese with kidney disease and their caregivers. In 2020, we recruited 18 adults with stage 3—5 kidney disease and their caregivers. We conducted semi-structured interviews to elicit knowledges and perspectives on ACP. A grounded theory approach was used to guide the analysis of primary themes. Two researchers independently coded the transcripts and met to reconcile codes. The primary barrier to ACP was the misconception that it equated to funeral arrangements. Themes related to ACP facilitators included: trust in the nephrology care team (especially in case managers); straighforward communication; and in-person consultations. Additionally, transplant patients were more likely to have ACP discussions with their loved ones. While kidney disease patients preferred straightforward communication, caregivers preferred indirect communications. These findings emphasize the critical role of the nephrological care team members. Improving knowledge of ACP and facilitating communication between caregivers and kidney disease patients in Taiwan is needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document