Implementing Advance Care Planning in a Range of Primary Care Practices: Adapting the Serious Illness Care Program for a Comparative Effectiveness Trial (GP797)

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 302-303
Author(s):  
David Nowels ◽  
Seiko Izumi ◽  
Annette Totten
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 76-76
Author(s):  
Jeff Myers ◽  
Suzanne Strasberg ◽  
Kathi Carroll ◽  
Zabin Dhanji ◽  
Ingrid Harle ◽  
...  

76 Background: In Ontario, the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care’s (MOHLTC) uses Quality Improvement Plans (QIPs) to drive system improvement aimed at providing high value, high quality care for all. To support the introduction of QIPs into the primary care sector, Cancer Care Ontario has developed an Advance Care Planning (ACP) toolkit for practices that include ACP as part of their annual QIP. ACP is an ongoing and dynamic process that involves a capable individual reflecting on their current values and beliefs for their health care, communicating their personal wishes for future health care and identifying an individual who will make decisions on their behalf in the event that they are unable to provide informed consent. The process is iterative and wishes may change over time with changes in health status. Methods: The ACP QIP was developed based on the Plan, Do, Study, Act cycle of continuous quality improvement. The ACP QIP provides primary care practices with detailed instructions on how to implement, monitor and report on an ACP Quality Improvement initiative. Importantly, the ACP QIP provides guidance and practical tools for developing objectives, establishing targets, and identifying measures and baselines for performance. CCO is actively promoting the ACP QIP in an effort to encourage uptake and broad adoption across Ontario. Results: There is now evidence that with ACP there is a greater likelihood EOL wishes will be both known and followed resulting in improved EOL care. ACP is also associated with decreased distress among the family members. Conclusions: Creating an ACP QIP supports primary care’s focus on advancing quality patient care. Importantly, implementing the ACP QIP into primary care practices has the potential to improve EOL care and secondarily reduce health care costs ultimately working towards achieving the triple aim of “better care, better health, and lower costs”.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abe Hafid ◽  
Michelle Howard ◽  
Dale Guenter ◽  
Dawn Elston ◽  
Erin Gallagher ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Advance care planning (ACP) conversations are associated with improved end-of-life healthcare outcomes and patients want to engage in ACP with their healthcare providers. Despite this, ACP conversations rarely occur in primary care settings. Therefore, the objective of this study was to implement ACP through adapted Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) training sessions, and to understand primary care provider perceptions of implementing ACP into practice. Methods: We conducted a quality improvement project guided by the Normalization Process Theory (NPT). NPT is an explanatory model the delineates the processes by which organizations implement and integrate new work. The project was implemented in an interprofessional academic family medicine group in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Primary care providers (PCP), consisting of physicians, family medicine residents, and allied health care providers, completed Pre- and post-SICP training self-assessments, NoMAD surveys, and structured interviews. Results: 30 PCPs participated in SICP training and completed self-assessments, 14 completed NoMAD surveys, and 7 were interviewed. Training self-assessments reported improvements in ACP confidence and skills. NoMAD surveys reported mixed opinions towards ACP implementation into primary care, raising concerns with their colleagues’ abilities to conduct ACP and their patients’ abilities to participate in ACP conversations. Interviews identified barriers to successful implementation including busy clinical schedules, patient preparedness, and provider discomfort or lack of confidence in having ACP conversations. Allied health identified discussing prognosis, scope of practice limitations and identification of appropriate patients as barriers. Conclusions: Our findings complement existing literature regarding high PCP confidence and willingness to conduct ACP, but low participation which may be attributed to logistical challenges. Our findings identified areas of the SICP that were more difficult to implement (i.e., prognostication). Future iterations will require a more systematic process to support the implementation of ACP into regular practice and to address knowledge gaps identified with targeted training.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abe Hafid ◽  
Michelle Howard ◽  
Dale Guenter ◽  
Dawn Elston ◽  
Shireen Fikree ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Advance care planning (ACP) conversations are associated with improved end-of-life healthcare outcomes and patients want to engage in ACP with their healthcare providers. Despite this, ACP conversations rarely occur in primary care settings. The objective of this study was to implement ACP through adapted Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) training sessions, and to understand primary care provider (PCP) perceptions of implementing ACP into practice. Methods We conducted a quality improvement project guided by the Normalization Process Theory (NPT), in an interprofessional academic family medicine group in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. NPT is an explanatory model that delineates the processes by which organizations implement and integrate new work. PCPs (physicians, family medicine residents, and allied health care providers), completed pre- and post-SICP self-assessments evaluating training effectiveness, a survey evaluating program implementability and sustainability, and semi-structured qualitative interviews to elaborate on barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for successful implementation. Descriptive statistics and pre-post differences (Wilcoxon Sign-Rank test) were used to analyze surveys and thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative interviews. Results 30 PCPs participated in SICP training and completed self-assessments, 14 completed NoMAD surveys, and 7 were interviewed. There were reported improvements in ACP confidence and skills. NoMAD surveys reported mixed opinions towards ACP implementation, specifically concerning colleagues’ abilities to conduct ACP and patients’ abilities to participate in ACP. Physicians discussed busy clinical schedules, lack of patient preparedness, and continued discomfort or lack of confidence in having ACP conversations. Allied health professionals discussed difficulty sharing patient prognosis and identification of appropriate patients as barriers. Conclusions Training in ACP conversations improved PCPs’ individual perceived abilities, but discomfort and other barriers were identified. Future iterations will require a more systematic process to support the implementation of ACP into regular practice, in addition to addressing knowledge and skill gaps.


2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-251.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nebras Abu Al Hamayel ◽  
Sarina R. Isenberg ◽  
Joshua Sixon ◽  
Katherine Clegg Smith ◽  
Samantha I. Pitts ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Peter Nightingale ◽  
Scott Murray ◽  
Chris Absolon

Advance care planning (ACP) is becoming more widely used as part of a drive to improve personalized care planning, but there is still more work to be done. Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination systems (EPaCCs) have proved to be very effective in some areas but there are many barriers to be overcome before they are universally available. This chapter covers recent developments leading to the wider integration of ACP into primary care. These include policy initiatives, educational opportunities, information technology (IT), professional quality control and regulation, financial and business incentives, and the Compassionate Community movement. The chapter includes an overview of issues surrounding ACP in primary care and in the community.


Author(s):  
Olivia M. Seecof ◽  
Molly Allanoff ◽  
John Liantonio ◽  
Susan Parks

Purpose: There is a dearth of literature regarding the documentation of advance care planning (ACP) in the geriatric population, despite the controversial, yet well-studied need for ACP. The purpose of this pilot study was to provide an update to a prior study from our institution that outlined the need for increased documentation of advance care planning (ACP) in an urban geriatric population. Methods: Our study involved using telemedicine to conduct dedicated ACP visits and an electronic medical record (EMR) note-template specifically designed for these visits in an attempt to increase the amount of documented ACP in the EMR in this population. Results: The study did not yield significant results due to the inability to schedule enough patients for these dedicated visits. Discussion: While our study was ultimately unsuccessful, 3 crucial lessons were identified that will inform and fuel future interventions by the authors to further the study of documentation of ACP.


Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah S. Nouri ◽  
Deborah E. Barnes ◽  
Ying Shi ◽  
Aiesha M. Volow ◽  
Nikita Shirsat ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document