scholarly journals The Limitations of Race/Ethnicity Categories in Reporting and Addressing (Disparities in Perinatal Health Outcomes

Author(s):  
Sunah S. Hwang
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
James E. Galvin ◽  
Stephanie Chrisphonte ◽  
Lun-Ching Chang

Background: Socioeconomic status (SES), race, ethnicity, and medical comorbidities may contribute to Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders (ADRD) health disparities. Objective: Analyze effects of social and medical determinants on cognition in 374 multicultural older adults participating in a community-based dementia screening program. Methods: We used the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and AD8 as measures of cognition, and a 3-way race/ethnicity variable (White, African American, Hispanic) and SES (Hollingshead index) as predictors. Potential contributors to health disparities included: age, sex, education, total medical comorbidities, health self-ratings, and depression. We applied K-means cluster analyses to study medical and social dimension effects on cognitive outcomes. Results: African Americans and Hispanics had lower SES status and cognitive performance compared with similarly aged Whites. We defined three clusters based on age and SES. Cluster #1 and #3 differed by SES but not age, while cluster #2 was younger with midlevel. Cluster #1 experienced the worse health outcomes while cluster #3 had the best health outcomes. Within each cluster, White participants had higher SES and better health outcomes, African Americans had the worst physical performance, and Hispanics had the most depressive symptoms. In cross-cluster comparisons, higher SES led to better health outcomes for all participants. Conclusion: SES may contribute to disparities in access to healthcare services, while race and ethnicity may contribute to disparities in the quality and extent of services received. Our study highlights the need to critically address potential interactions between race, ethnicity, and SES which may better explain disparities in ADRD health outcomes.


Author(s):  
Jodie M. DODD ◽  
Rosalie M. GRIVELL ◽  
Anh-Minh NGUYEN ◽  
Annabelle CHAN ◽  
Jeffrey S. ROBINSON

Author(s):  
MarySue V. Heilemann ◽  
Kathryn A. Lee ◽  
Janice Stinson ◽  
Jeanette H. Koshar ◽  
Gay Goss

BMC Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Heslehurst ◽  
Heather Brown ◽  
Augustina Pemu ◽  
Hayley Coleman ◽  
Judith Rankin

10.2196/10012 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. e10012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M Daly ◽  
Dell Horey ◽  
Philippa F Middleton ◽  
Frances M Boyle ◽  
Vicki Flenady

Author(s):  
Clare R. Brock ◽  
Bartholomew H. Sparrow

Food policy intersects with racial and ethnic politics along several dimensions: the agricultural workforce, acculturation into American society, the availability of healthy food, and the provision of social programs. First, the demand for agricultural and other low-wage workers in the food industry has encouraged immigration but many of the undocumented suffer from lack of access to basic services and legal protections. Second, many of these recent immigrants are less likely to suffer from the diseases of over-abundance that affect many Americans. However, as immigrants become acculturated into American life, their health outcomes become increasingly similar to less educated and poorer blacks and whites. Third, diet-related diseases are part of a multifaceted problem: education and income are often barriers to procuring healthy foods. Fourth, white attitudes about minority groups is associated with less support for social programs that might improve minority health outcomes. This chapter links these distinct areas of research.


2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 698-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
E L Donnelley ◽  
C H Raynes-Greenow ◽  
R M Turner ◽  
A E Carberry ◽  
H E Jeffery

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 205-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sol P. Juárez ◽  
Gaby Ortiz-Barreda ◽  
Andrés A. Agudelo-Suárez ◽  
Elena Ronda-Pérez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document