Postoperative Pain Following Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: A Descriptive Study

Author(s):  
Olivia Ganescu ◽  
Sherif Emil ◽  
Christine Saint-Martin ◽  
Elena Guadagno ◽  
Jean-Martin Laberge ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (05) ◽  
pp. 465-471
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Sujka ◽  
Charlene Dekonenko ◽  
Daniel L. Millspaugh ◽  
Nichole M. Doyle ◽  
Benjamin J. Walker ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Postoperative pain control remains the primary reason for inpatient stay after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. In a previous study, our group reported that early pain control was better in patients managed with a thoracic epidural, while late pain control was better in patients managed with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). After revising our epidural transition and modifying the PCA protocol, we conducted a multi-institutional prospective randomized trial to evaluate these two pain control strategies. Materials and Methods Patients were randomized to epidural or PCA following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum with standard protocols for each arm. Primary outcome was length of stay with secondary variables including mean patient pain scores, complications, and parental satisfaction. Scores were pooled for the two groups and reported as means with standard deviation. Results were compared using t-tests and one-way analysis of variance with p-value < 0.05 determining significance. Results Sixty-five patients were enrolled, 32 epidural and 33 PCA. Enrollment was stopped early when we developed an alternative strategy for controlling these patients' pain. There was no difference in length of stay in hours between the two arms; epidural 111.3 ± 18.5 versus PCA 111.4 ± 51.4, p = 0.98. Longer operative time was found in the epidural group. Nine patients in the epidural group (28%) required a PCA in addition to epidural for adequate pain control. Mean pain scores were lower on postoperative day 0 in the epidural group compared with the PCA groups, but were otherwise similar. Conclusion In our prospective randomized trial, PCA is just as effective as thoracic epidural in decreasing early postoperative pain scores after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum.


2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 2425-2430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Lukosiene ◽  
Danguole Ceslava Rugyte ◽  
Andrius Macas ◽  
Lina Kalibatiene ◽  
Dalius Malcius ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1006-1012
Author(s):  
Kristen M. Uhl ◽  
Robert T. Wilder ◽  
Allison Fernandez ◽  
Henry Huang ◽  
Wallis T. Muhly ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1383-1386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Sujka ◽  
Leo Andrew Benedict ◽  
Jason D. Fraser ◽  
Pablo Aguayo ◽  
Daniel L. Millspaugh ◽  
...  

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 289-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haecker ◽  
Bielek ◽  
von Schweinitz

Purpose: Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) was first reported in 1998 by D. Nuss. This technique has gained wide acceptance during the last 4-5 years. In the meantime, some modifications of the technique have been introduced by different authors. Our retrospective study reports our own experience over the last 36 months and modifications introduced due to a number of complications. Methods: From 3/2000 to 3/2003, 22 patients underwent MIRPE. Patients median age was 15.5 years (10.7 to 20.3 years). Standardised preoperative evaluation included 3D computerised tomography (CT) scan, pulmonary function tests, cardiac evaluation with electrocardiogram and echocardiography, and photo documentation. Indications for operation included at least two of the following: Haller CT index > 3.2, restrictive lung disease, cardiac compression, progression of the deformity and severe psychological alterations. Results: In 22 patients (2 girls, 20 boys) undergoing MIRPE procedure, a single bar was used in 21 patients and two bars in one boy. Lateral stabilisers were fixed with non resorbable sutures on both sides. Overall, postoperative complications occurred in six patients (27.3%). In two patients (9.1%) a redo-procedure was necessary due to bar displacement. An additional median skin incision was performed in two patients to elevate the sternum. Pneumothorax or hematothorax in two patients resulted in routine use of a chest tube on both sides. Long-term favourable results were noted in all patients. Conclusions: The MIRPE procedure is an effective method with elegant cosmetic results. Modifications of the original method help to decrease the complication rate and to accelerate acquirement of expertise.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document