Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine

Background: Ultrasound-guided rhombic intercostal block (RIB) is a novel regional block that provides analgesia for patients who have received video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The anesthetic characteristics of ultrasound-guided RIB with different concentrations of ropivacaine are not known. This research primarily hypothesizes that ultrasound-guided RIB, given in combination with the same volume of different concentrations of ropivacaine, would improve the whole quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) among patients with VATS.Approaches: This double-blinded, single-center, prospective, and controlled trial randomized 100 patients undergoing VATS to receive RIB. One hundred patients who have received elective VATS and satisfied inclusion standards were fallen into four groups randomly: control group with no RIB and R0.2%, R0.3%, and R0.4%; they underwent common anesthesia plus the RIB with ropivacaine at 0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.4% in a volume of 30 ml.Outcomes: Groups R0.2%, R0.3%, and R0.4% displayed great diversities in the overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions (in addition to psychological support) by comparing with the control group (Group C) (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). Groups R0.3% and R0.4% displayed great diversities in the overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions (in addition to psychological support) by comparing with the R0.2% group (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). The overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions [physical comfort (p = 0.585)] did not vary greatly between Groups R0.3% and R0.4% (p > 0.05 for all contrasts). Groups R0.2%, R0.3%, and R0.4% showed significant differences in numerical rating scales (NRS) score region under the curve (AUC) at rest and on movement in 48 h when compared with the Group C (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). Groups R0.3% and R0.4% displayed great diversities in NRS score AUC at rest and on movement in 48 h when compared with the R0.2% group (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). The NRS mark AUC at rest and, on movement in 48 h, did not vary greatly between the Group R0.3% and R0.4% (p > 0.05 for all contrasts).Conclusion: In this study it was found that a dose of 0.3% ropivacaine is the best concentration for RIB for patients undergoing VATS. Through growing ropivacaine concentration, the analgesia of the RIB was not improved greatly.Clinicaltrials.gov Registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier ChiCTR2100046254.

Comparison of Intercostal Nerve Block with Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine-Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Thoracotomy is one of the most painful surgeries, and failure to alleviate patients' pain can have dangerous consequences. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine in the intercostal block for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing thoracotomy. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 74 patients aged 18 to 60 years with ASA class I or II, BMI less than 40, and no severe systemic problems referred to a teaching hospital in Ahvaz to undergo thoracotomy were included in the study and randomly divided into two groups. After surgery, an ultrasound-guided intercostal block was done with ropivacaine (5 cc of 0.25% solution; group R) or ropivacaine (5 cc of 0.25% solution) plus dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg; group RD) per dermatome. Two dermatomes above and two dermatomes below the level of surgical incision were used. Pain, total opioid consumption, length of ICU stays, time to first rescue analgesic, and time to get out of bed were compared between the two groups. Results: The intercostal block significantly reduced pain in both groups (P < 0.0001). The pain was lower in the RD group than in the R group from six hours after the intervention up to 24 hours after (P < 0.001). The number of patients who needed rescue analgesia at 12 hours was significantly lower in the RD group (P < 0.05). The RD group also had lower total opioid consumption and a longer time to receive the first rescue analgesia (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the length of hospitalization and the time to get out of bed. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine is an effective and safe choice to be used as an adjunct to ropivacaine in ICB, and it extends the duration of analgesia in combination with ropivacaine after thoracotomy.

How to optimize your set-up for a VATS right upper lobectomy

A 77-year-old woman with multiple ground-glass opacities, the largest of which measured 21 mm, has a biopsy-proven primary lung adenocarcinoma in her right upper lobe. We performed a 3-port right-sided VATS using the Copenhagen approach. There was no pleural effusion or evidence of pleural metastatic spread. A tumor was identified in the upper lobe. The surrounding lung tissue appeared normal. We performed a multilevel intercostal block using 0.25% levobupivacaine. The inferior pulmonary ligament was divided. The superior pulmonary vein and 2 branches of the pulmonary artery to the right upper lobe were dissected, encircled, and divided using tan reloads of the Endo GIA stapler. The right upper lobe bronchus was dissected, encircled, and divided in a similar fashion using a purple reload of the Endo GIA stapler following a successful test inflation of the lower and middle lobes. The horizontal fissure was completed with further firings of the stapler. Lymph nodes from stations 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 were sampled and sent separately for histological analysis. There was no parenchymal or stump leak to 20 cm H20 on the test inflation. Hemostasis and pneumostasis were checked and ensured. A single 24 Fr drain was placed in the apex. Hemostasis was complete. The incision was closed in layers.

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus rhomboid intercostal block for postoperative analgesia following thoracotomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

Introduction For pain relief after thoracotomy, opioids and thoracic paravertebral and epidural interventions are frequently used. In recent years, interfascial blocks such as the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) have started to be used for analgesia. We aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic effect of ESPB, RIB, and a control group in pain management after open thoracotomy. Material and methods This is a randomized controlled trial. A total of 75 patients were included in three groups as the ESPB, RIB, and control (C) groups. In block groups, the blockage was performed with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine. In Group C, no procedures other than the standard postoperative analgesia protocol were performed. The postoperative analgesic consumptions of the patients, time of first analgesic need, and visual analog scale (VAS) values were recorded. Results The mean 24-hour tramadol consumption was 124±29.08 mg in group ESPB and 116±28.65 mg in group RIB, and the results were statistically similar (p>0.05). In Group C, the consumption is 204±44.06 mg; significantly higher than group ESPB and group RIB (p=0.004). Time to the first analgesic requirement was 355±55.69 min in group ESPB and 339.12±54.39 min in group RIB. There was no difference between groups (p>0.05). In Group C, this time was 218.91±56.73 minutes. We observed that group ESPB and group RIB needed analgesics later (p=0.006). VAS scores and the number of patients requiring analgesics were similar in group ESPB and group RIB (p>0.05). In Group C, on the other hand, VAS scores and the number of patients requiring analgesics were higher than both groups in which block was applied (p<0.05). Conclusion ESPB and RIB were similar and they are more effective in comparison to the standard protocol in the control group, whereas the former did not have superiority over each other.

Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing three Concentrations of Ropivacaine

Background: Ultrasound-guided rhombic intercostal block (RIB) is a novel regional block that provides analgesia for patients who have received video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The anesthetic characteristics of ultrasound-guided RIB with different concentrations of ropivacaine are not known. This research primarily hypothesizes that ultrasound-guided RIB, given in combination with the same volume of different concentrations of ropivacaine, would improve the whole quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) among patients with VATS.Approaches: This double-blinded, single-center, prospective, and controlled trial randomized 100 patients undergoing VATS to receive RIB. One hundred patients who have received elective VATS and satisfied inclusion standards were fallen into four groups randomly: control group with no RIB and R0.2%, R0.3%, and R0.4%; they underwent common anesthesia plus the RIB with ropivacaine at 0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.4% in a volume of 30mL.Outcomes: Groups R0.2%, R0.3%, and R0.4% displayed great diversities in the overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions (in addition to psychological support) by comparing with the control group (Group C) (p<0.001 for all contrasts). Group R0.3% and R0.4% displayed great diversities in the overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions (in addition to psychological support) by comparing with the R0.2% group (p<0.001 for all contrasts). The overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions (physical comfort [p=0.585]) did not vary greatly between the Group R0.3% and R0.4% (p>0.05 for all contrasts). Group R0.2%, R0.3% and R0.4% showed significant differences in numerical rating scales (NRS) score region under the curve (AUC) at rest and on movement in 48 hours when compared with the Group C (p<0.001 for all contrasts). Group R0.3% and R0.4% displayed great diversities in NRS score AUC at rest and on movement in 48 hours when compared with the R0.2% group (p<0.001 for all contrasts). The NRS mark AUC at rest and on movement in 48 hours did not vary greatly between the Group R0.3% and R0.4% (p>0.05 for all contrasts).Conclusion: It was found that a dose of 0.3% ropivacaine is the best concentration for RIB for patients undergoing VATS. Through growing ropivacaine concentration, the analgesia of the RIB was not improved greatly.Trial registration number: ChiCTR2100046254

Efficacy and Safety of Rhomboid Intercostal Block for Analgesia in Breast Surgery and Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

BackgroundRhomboid intercostal block (RIB) is a new regional anesthesia technique that provides postoperative analgesia for breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery. The published papers are not yet fully integrated and do not adequately address the impact and safety of the RIB on postoperative pain.MethodsThe PubMed, Web of Science and Embase were searched from 2016 to 2021 for all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of RIB after thoracic surgery and breast surgery. Random and fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used where indicated, and between-study heterogeneity was assessed. The primary outcome was Postoperative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores of patients at rest recorded 0-1, 6-8, 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes included rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative fentanyl consumption and presence of complications of the block. ResultsFrom 81 records identified, four studies met our inclusion criteria, including 216 patients (RIB:108 patients; no block: 108 patients). In the primary outcome, RIB group showed significantly lower postoperative NRS at rest at first 0-1 h and 6-8 h (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.55; 95% confidence internal [CI] = -2.92 to -0.19; p<0.05), (WMD = -0. 69; 95% CI = -1.29 to -0. 09; p<0. 05). And there was no significant difference between groups in NRS at rest at 24 h (WMD = -0.78; 95% CI = -1.64 to -0.08; p=0.77). Also, RIB group showed significantly lower postoperative NRS of breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery at 0-1h (WMD = -3.00; 95% CI = -3.13 to -2.87; p<0.01), (WMD = -1.08; 95% CI = -1.98 to -0.18; p<0.05). In the secondary outcome, the analysis also showed RIB group had significant lower of POVN rates (summary relative risk (RR) = 0.212;95%CI = 0.10 to 0.45; p<0. 01) and the postoperative consumption of fentanyl (WMD= -57.52;95%CI = -106.03 to -9.02; p<0. 05). ConclusionThis review shows that RIB was more effective in controlling acute pain after breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery than general analgesia. And RIB is also a kind of effective and safe bock technology.