Genuine and deceitful symptom reporting in psychosomatic patients A study in a medico-legal or disability claim setting

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 110-111
Author(s):  
Tjerk Schoemaker ◽  
Jos de Jonghe ◽  
Anne-Ava Stevens ◽  
Rudolf Ponds
Author(s):  
Natalie A. Emmert ◽  
Georgia Ristow ◽  
Michael A. McCrea ◽  
Terri A. deRoon-Cassini ◽  
Lindsay D. Nelson

Abstract Objective: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) symptoms are typically assessed via questionnaires in research, yet questionnaires may be more prone to biases than direct clinical interviews. We compared mTBI symptoms reported on two widely used self-report inventories and the novel Structured Interview of TBI Symptoms (SITS). Second, we explored the association between acquiescence response bias and symptom reporting across modes of assessment. Method: Level 1 trauma center patients with mTBI (N = 73) were recruited within 2 weeks of injury, assessed at 3 months post-TBI, and produced nonacquiescent profiles. Assessments collected included the SITS (comprising open-ended and closed-ended questions), Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ), Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-3 (SCAT-3) symptom checklist, and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form True Response Inconsistency (TRIN-r) scale. Results: Current mTBI symptom burden and individual symptom endorsement were highly concordant between SITS closed-ended questions, the RPQ, and the SCAT-3. Within the SITS, participants reported significantly fewer mTBI symptoms to open-ended as compared to later closed-ended questions, and this difference was weakly correlated with TRIN-r. Symptom scales were weakly associated with TRIN-r. Conclusions: mTBI symptom reporting varies primarily by whether questioning is open- vs. closed-ended but not by mode of assessment (interview, questionnaire). Acquiescence response bias appears to play a measurable but small role in mTBI symptom reporting overall and the degree to which participants report more symptoms to closed- than open-ended questioning. These findings have important implications for mTBI research and support the validity of widely used TBI symptom inventories.


Author(s):  
Harald Merckelbach ◽  
Peter Muris ◽  
Willem Johan Kop
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1036-1036
Author(s):  
Kaitlin E Riegler ◽  
Erin T Guty ◽  
Garrett A Thomas ◽  
Megan Bradson ◽  
Peter A Arnett

Abstract Objective First, to explore demographic/injury characteristics associated with increased sleep disruption post-concussion. Second, to examine the association between sleep disruption post-concussion and symptom reporting and cognitive variability. Method 124 athletes (M = 103, F = 21) completed neuropsychological testing within 14 days of concussion. Athletes were categorized as sleep-disrupted (n = 52) or not sleep-disrupted (n = 72). Athletes in the sleep-disrupted group endorsed one or more of the following from the Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS): trouble falling asleep, sleeping more than usual, and sleeping less than usual. Loss of consciousness (LOC) and concussion history were explored. Two neurocognitive variability measures were derived from the neuropsychological battery: intraindividual standard deviation (ISD) and maximum discrepancy score (MDS). Variability in memory and attention/processing speed (APS) composites were explored. Total PCSS symptom score, without sleep items, was calculated. Results A significantly greater proportion of sleep-disrupted athletes experienced LOC (30%) compared to not sleep-disrupted athletes (13%), χ2(1,N = 118) = 4.99, p < 0.03, φ = 0.21. Sleep-disrupted athletes reported more symptoms, t(122) = −5.42, p < 0.001, d = 0.98, and demonstrated more memory variability (memory ISD, t(122) = −2.22, p = 0.03, d = 0.40, and memory MDS, t(122) = −2.29, p = 0.02, d = 0.41) than not sleep-disrupted athletes. Groups did not differ in APS variability or concussion history. Conclusions Given the higher rate of LOC in sleep-disrupted athletes, it is possible that LOC is a mechanism leading to post-concussion sleep difficulties. Furthermore, sleep disruption following concussion results in more variable memory performance and higher symptom reporting. Symptom reporting and/or return to baseline cognitive functioning are often decision-making tools in concussion management. The difficulties experienced by sleep-disrupted athletes may complicate recovery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 362-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Walentynowicz ◽  
Ilse Van Diest ◽  
Filip Raes ◽  
Omer Van den Bergh
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 300-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey A. Brickell ◽  
Sara M. Lippa ◽  
Louis M. French ◽  
Jan E. Kennedy ◽  
Jason M. Bailie ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 356-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa C. Delisle ◽  
Erin Arthurs ◽  
Susan E. Abbey ◽  
Sherry L. Grace ◽  
Donna E. Stewart ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document