Aerobic fitness and field test performance in elite Spanish soccer referees of different ages

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 382-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Antonio Casajus ◽  
Carlo Castagna
Keyword(s):  
Field Test ◽  
Aerobic Fitness ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Different Ages

Field Test Performance of Noncontact Ultrasonic Rail Inspection System

2017 ◽  
Vol 143 (5) ◽  
pp. 04017007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Mariani ◽  
Thompson Nguyen ◽  
Xuan Zhu ◽  
Francesco Lanza di Scalea
Keyword(s):  
Field Test ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Inspection System ◽  
Rail Inspection

scholarly journals A 1-Year Study of Endurance Runners: Training, Laboratory Tests, and Field Tests

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1019-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy Galbraith ◽  
James Hopker ◽  
Marco Cardinale ◽  
Brian Cunniffe ◽  
Louis Passfield
Keyword(s):  
Field Test ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Lactate Threshold ◽  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
Field Tests ◽  
Running Economy ◽  
Training Time ◽  
Repeated Measures Anova ◽  
Endurance Runners

Purpose:To examine the training and concomitant changes in laboratory- and field-test performance of highly trained endurance runners.Methods:Fourteen highly trained male endurance runners (mean ± SD maximal oxygen uptake [VO2max] 69.8 ± 6.3 mL · kg−1 · min−1) completed this 1-y training study commencing in April. During the study the runners undertook 5 laboratory tests of VO2max, lactate threshold (LT), and running economy and 9 field tests to determine critical speed (CS) and the modeled maximum distance performed above CS (D′). The data for different periods of the year were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA. The influence of training on laboratory- and field-test changes was analyzed by multiple regression.Results:Total training distance varied during the year and was lower in May–July (333 ± 206 km, P = .01) and July–August (339 ± 206 km, P = .02) than in the subsequent January–February period (474 ± 188 km). VO2max increased from the April baseline (4.7 ± 0.4 L/min) in October and January periods (5.0 ± 0.4 L/min, P ≤ .01). Other laboratory measures did not change. Runners’ CS was lowest in August (4.90 ± 0.32 m/s) and highest in February (4.99 ± 0.30 m/s, P = .02). Total training distance and the percentage of training time spent above LT velocity explained 33% of the variation in CS.Conclusion:Highly trained endurance runners achieve small but significant changes in VO2max and CS in a year. Increases in training distance and time above LT velocity were related to increases in CS.

Physiological and Field Test Performance Changes of Community College Football Players Over a Season

1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 211
Author(s):  
Kimberly A. dos Remedios ◽  
Robert L. dos Remedios ◽  
Steven F. Loy ◽  
George J. Holland ◽  
William J. Vincent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community College ◽  
Field Test ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
College Football ◽  
Football Players

scholarly journals Effects of Modified Multistage Field Test on Performance and Physiological Responses in Wheelchair Basketball Players

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Weissland ◽  
Arnaud Faupin ◽  
Benoit Borel ◽  
Serge Berthoin ◽  
Pierre-Marie Leprêtre
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Field Test ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Test Score ◽  
Minute Ventilation ◽  
Physiological Responses ◽  
Field Tests ◽  
Wheelchair Basketball ◽  
Basketball Players ◽  
And Performance

A bioenergetical analysis of manoeuvrability and agility performance for wheelchair players is inexistent. It was aimed at comparing the physiological responses and performance obtained from the octagon multistage field test (MFT) and the modified condition in “8 form” (MFT-8). Sixteen trained wheelchair basketball players performed both tests in randomized condition. The levels performed (end-test score), peak values of oxygen uptake(VO2peak), minute ventilation(VEpeak), heart rate(HRpeak), peak and relative blood lactate (Δ[Lact−] = peak – rest values), and the perceived rating exertion (RPE) were measured. MFT-8 induced higherVO2peakandVEpeakvalues compared to MFT (VO2peak: 2.5 ± 0.6 versus 2.3 ± 0.6 L·min−1andVEpeak: 96.3 ± 29.1 versus 86.6 ± 23.4 L·min−1;P<0.05) with no difference in other parameters. Significant relations betweenVEpeakand end-test score were correlated for both field tests(P<0.05). At exhaustion, MFT attained incompletelyVO2peakandVEpeak. Among experienced wheelchair players, MFT-8 had no effect on test performance but generates higher physiological responses than MFT. It could be explained by demands of wheelchair skills occurring in 8 form during the modified condition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document