scholarly journals Does superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repair timing matter?

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. S51
Author(s):  
G. Murphy ◽  
P. Lam ◽  
G. Murrell
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 2563-2568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Gwan Park ◽  
Nam Su Cho ◽  
Jung Youn Kim ◽  
Jong Hoon Song ◽  
Se Jung Hong ◽  
...  

Background: Studies on failed superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) repair are increasing. However, the number of reports on treatment options for failed SLAP repair remains quite low, and the clinical results vary between different study groups. Purpose: To describe the clinical presentation of failed SLAP repair due to knot-induced pain and evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic knot removal. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed records of 11 patients (mean age, 24.6 ± 8.6 years; range, 17-43 years) with stable, healed SLAP lesions with knot-induced pain after arthroscopic fixation of unstable type II SLAP lesions. All patients demonstrated a positive compression-rotation test before knot removal. The mean follow-up duration after knot removal was 48.0 ± 37.4 months (range, 24-156 months). The mean duration between primary fixation and knot removal was 21.2 ± 14.7 months (range, 8-56 months). Results: Sharp pain (100%) and clicking (64%) were the most common symptoms. The knot was positioned on the glenoid side in 5 patients and the labral side in 6 patients. The knots on the glenoid side had associated humeral head cartilage damage. The mean University of California at Los Angeles score significantly improved from 15.2 points to 31.7 points after knot removal ( P = .003) Additionally, the mean Constant score greatly improved from a mean of 56.5 points to 89.8 points ( P = .003). At a mean of 3 weeks after surgery, we observed dramatic pain relief. Six weeks after surgery, the compression-rotation test was negative in all patients. Conclusion: The most common symptom of knot-induced pain after SLAP repair was persistent sharp pain followed by clicking. The knot appears to be a cause of pain in failed SLAP repairs, and arthroscopic knot removal can provide dramatic pain relief and significant improvement of clinical outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949901988855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C Dougherty ◽  
J Erik Kulenkamp ◽  
Haroutioun Boyajian ◽  
Jason L Koh ◽  
Michael J Lee ◽  
...  

Background: Since superior labrum anterior-to-posterior (SLAP) tear was introduced as an International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis in 1994, awareness, diagnosis, and surgical treatment of this disorder has increased. Here, we aim to clarify trends in the frequency of SLAP tear diagnosis and arthroscopic SLAP repair surgery in the United States. Methods: Using private insurance claims from 2003 to 2013 in MarketScan (approximately 55 million Americans), we identified patients with SLAP tear diagnosis or arthroscopic SLAP repair surgery. Population-based rates of SLAP diagnosis and related shoulder procedures were calculated. Results: A total of 329,643 patients in the MarketScan database received a SLAP tear diagnosis. In all, 62.8% underwent some form of shoulder surgery after diagnosis. SLAP diagnosis increased from 28.0 per 100,000 in 2003 to 142.4 per 100,000 in 2013 ( p < 0.0001); the rate of shoulder surgery in these patients increased from 20.1 per 100,000 in 2003 to 74.1 per 100,000 in 2013 ( p < 0.0001). However, the percentage of patients with SLAP tears who got shoulder surgery decreased ( p < 0.0001). In 2003, almost no patient got biceps tenodesis for SLAP tears; by 2013, 18.1% of surgeries for SLAP tear were biceps tenodesis. Isolated arthroscopic SLAP repairs peaked in 2009 at 28.4 per 100,000 and stabilized thereafter. Conclusion: We confirmed prior reports that SLAP diagnosis increased from 2003 to 2013, although the percentage of these patients who underwent surgery decreased over this period. Arthroscopic SLAP repair doubled but then plateaued after 2009. Biceps tenodesis now accounts for a substantial portion of surgeries for SLAP tear. This may reflect an improved understanding of superior labrum anatomy and biomechanics.


2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin C. Chambers ◽  
T. Sean Lynch ◽  
Daniel B. Gibbs ◽  
Jason H. Ghodasra ◽  
Shawn Sahota ◽  
...  

Background: Shoulder disorders are common in football players, with up to 50% of National Football League (NFL) recruits reporting a history of shoulder injuries. Superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears are an entity with well-described detrimental effects on return to play in overhead-throwing athletes but with minimal data in contact athletes. Purpose: To identify the incidence, predisposing factors, and effect of SLAP tears in NFL athletes and prospects as well as the treatment patterns of NFL team physicians. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: This study was a comprehensive analysis of SLAP tears in elite football players using a dual approach: (1) SLAP injuries recorded in the NFL Injury Surveillance System from 2000 to 2014 were evaluated by player position, type of play, days/games lost, and surgical intervention; (2) NFL Scouting Combine athletes from 2003 to 2011 with prior SLAP repair were evaluated for draft success, and drafted athletes were compared with matched controls for career length and performance scores. Results: SLAP tears represented a small portion (3.1%) of shoulder injuries in NFL athletes from 2000 to 2014, occurring most commonly in offensive linemen (28%). Surgically treated SLAP tears (42%) resulted in more days missed than did nonoperatively managed tears (140.2 vs 21.5 days; P < .001) and more games missed (8.4 vs 2.6 games; P = .003). SLAP repairs were also rare in NFL Combine athletes (n = 25 of 2965 athletes), with most having been performed in offensive linemen (32%). As compared with control NFL Combine athletes without SLAP tears, those drafted into the NFL with prior SLAP repair played significantly fewer games (33.7 vs 48.3; P = .049) and had fewer game starts (19.6 vs 35.4; P = .036). Conclusion: In this comprehensive analysis of SLAP tears in elite football players, it is clear that these injuries have the potential to cause significant detriment to an athlete’s career.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0033
Author(s):  
Christopher Colasanti ◽  
Eoghan Hurley ◽  
Nathan Lorentz ◽  
Danielle Markus ◽  
Bogdan Matache ◽  
...  

Objectives: Superior-labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears are common among athletic populations and may require surgical treatment. Return to play post-operatively may be complicated by a number of factors, including psychological readiness to return. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of the SLAP Return to Sport Index (SLAP-RSI) score to quantify psychological readiness to return to play following operative management of SLAP tears. Methods: A retrospective review of athletes who underwent operative management of SLAP tears with a minimum of 12-month follow-up was performed. Patients were evaluated for their psychological readiness to return to sport using the SLAP-RSI score. The SLAP-RSI score was created by adapting the terms in the Anterior (ACL-RSI score) with terms related to SLAP tears. A SLAP-RSI score > 56 is considered a passing score for being psychologically ready to return to play. Results: The study included 174 athletes who underwent operative management of SLAP tears. Overall, 73.5% percent of patients were able to return to play, and the mean SLAP-RSI score in this cohort was 74.1±20.9, as compared to 46.7±27.7 in those who were unable to return (p<0.0001). Of those who returned, 82.1% passed the SLAP-RSI benchmark of 56, while of those who did not return, 33.3% passed the SLAP-RSI benchmark of 56. Additionally, a significant difference was found in each component of the SLAP-RSI score between the two cohorts (p<0.05). No individual component of the SLAP-RSI score was below 56 in patients who were able to return to play, while none was above 56 in those who were unable to return. Among patients who were unable to return, ones who cited lifestyle reasons had a higher SLAP-RSI score (77.4 ± 21.8) than those who cited residual pain (28.2 ± 15.1) or fear of re-injury (42.6 ± 23.6) (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Following the operative management of SLAP repair, patients that are unable to return to play exhibit poor psychological readiness to return which may be due to residual pain or fear of re-injury.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document