scholarly journals Outcomes of type II superior labrum, anterior to posterior (SLAP) repair: Prospective evaluation at a minimum two-year follow-up

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 859-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole A. Friel ◽  
Vasili Karas ◽  
Mark A. Slabaugh ◽  
Brian J. Cole
Keyword(s):  
Type Ii ◽  
Prospective Evaluation ◽  
Superior Labrum ◽  
Slap Repair

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41
Author(s):  
Sung Hyun Lee ◽  
Min Su Joo ◽  
Kyeong Hoon Lim ◽  
Jeong Woo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Slap Lesion ◽  
Bankart Lesion ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale Pain ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Slap Lesions ◽  
Superior Labrum ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate results of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repairs and debridement of type II SLAP lesions combined with Bankart lesions.METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, total 58 patients with anterior shoulder instability due to a Bankart lesion combined with a type II SLAP lesion were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: group C consisted of 30 patients, each with a communicated Bankart and type II SLAP lesion and group NC consisted of 28 patients, each with a non-communicated Bankart and type II SLAP lesion. Bankart repairs were performed for all patients. SLAP lesions were repaired in group C and debrided in group NC. Clinical results were analysed to compare groups C and NC by using the visual analogue scale pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant scores, Rowe score for instability and range of motion assessments.RESULTS: The clinical scores were improved in both groups at final follow-up. Also, there were no differences between two groups. No significant difference was found in terms of the range of motion measured at the last follow-up. The number of suture anchors used was significantly higher in group C than in group NC (5.6 vs. 3.8; p=0.021).CONCLUSIONS: In this study, it is considered that Bankart repair and SLAP debridement could be a treatment option in patients with a non-communicated type II SLAP lesion combined with a Bankart lesion (study design: IV, therapeutic study, case series).

scholarly journals Superior-Labrum Anterior-Posterior Return to Sport Index (SLAP-RSI) Score to Quantify Psychological Readiness to Return to Play (223)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0033
Author(s):  
Christopher Colasanti ◽  
Eoghan Hurley ◽  
Nathan Lorentz ◽  
Danielle Markus ◽  
Bogdan Matache ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Return To Sport ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Residual Pain ◽  
Superior Labrum ◽  
Slap Repair ◽  
Number Of Factors ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Objectives: Superior-labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears are common among athletic populations and may require surgical treatment. Return to play post-operatively may be complicated by a number of factors, including psychological readiness to return. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of the SLAP Return to Sport Index (SLAP-RSI) score to quantify psychological readiness to return to play following operative management of SLAP tears. Methods: A retrospective review of athletes who underwent operative management of SLAP tears with a minimum of 12-month follow-up was performed. Patients were evaluated for their psychological readiness to return to sport using the SLAP-RSI score. The SLAP-RSI score was created by adapting the terms in the Anterior (ACL-RSI score) with terms related to SLAP tears. A SLAP-RSI score > 56 is considered a passing score for being psychologically ready to return to play. Results: The study included 174 athletes who underwent operative management of SLAP tears. Overall, 73.5% percent of patients were able to return to play, and the mean SLAP-RSI score in this cohort was 74.1±20.9, as compared to 46.7±27.7 in those who were unable to return (p<0.0001). Of those who returned, 82.1% passed the SLAP-RSI benchmark of 56, while of those who did not return, 33.3% passed the SLAP-RSI benchmark of 56. Additionally, a significant difference was found in each component of the SLAP-RSI score between the two cohorts (p<0.05). No individual component of the SLAP-RSI score was below 56 in patients who were able to return to play, while none was above 56 in those who were unable to return. Among patients who were unable to return, ones who cited lifestyle reasons had a higher SLAP-RSI score (77.4 ± 21.8) than those who cited residual pain (28.2 ± 15.1) or fear of re-injury (42.6 ± 23.6) (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Following the operative management of SLAP repair, patients that are unable to return to play exhibit poor psychological readiness to return which may be due to residual pain or fear of re-injury.

Is timing of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repair important? A cohort study evaluating the effect of the duration of symptoms prior to surgery on the outcomes of patients who underwent type II SLAP repair

2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110158
Author(s):  
Geoffrey T Murphy ◽  
Patrick H Lam ◽  
George AC Murrell
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Limited Effect ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Early Repair ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Superior Labrum ◽  
Slap Repair ◽  
Repair Group

Background The management of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) tears is somewhat controversial. It is unclear if the length of time between symptom onset and surgery affects SLAP repair outcomes. Methods Sixty-one SLAP repairs were retrospectively reviewed pre-operatively and post-operatively at 1, 6, 24 weeks, and > 2 years post-surgery. Patients were allocated to an ‘early repair’ or ‘late repair’ group based on time between symptom onset and surgery. Results Of the 61 patients, 22 patients had surgery within six months of symptom onset. Pre-operatively, ‘late repair’ patients played a higher level of sport than ‘early repair’ patients prior to injury. Post-operatively, both groups had similar outcomes up to six months, though at six months ‘early repair’ patients reported a higher level of work than ‘late repair’ patients (p = 0.01). At > 2 years after surgery, ‘early repair’ patients had reduced pain and difficulty with overhead activities (p = 0.002), less stiffness (p = 0.001) and were more satisfied than ‘late repair’ patients (p = 0.04). Conclusions Up to six months post-operatively, the time between symptom onset and surgery has limited effect on functional outcomes. However, at > 2 years after surgery, earlier repairs ( < 6 months) are interestingly associated with better functional outcomes. Further studies are required to determine if this is a causal relationship.

Prospective evaluation for gastrointestinal bleedings at the University Hospital St. Pölten – one year of follow-up

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Stättermayer ◽  
F Riedl ◽  
S Bernhofer ◽  
A Stättermayer ◽  
A Mayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
University Hospital ◽  
Prospective Evaluation ◽  
One Year ◽  
The University

Image-guided translumbar type II endoleak repair: A novel approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Salman Mirza ◽  
Shahnawaz Ansari
Keyword(s):  
Mesenteric Artery ◽  
Inferior Mesenteric Artery ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Type Ii Endoleak ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

We present a case of a 72-year-old male with an abdominal aortic aneurysm status post-endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Follow-up imaging demonstrated an enlarging type II endoleak and attempts at transarterial coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery were unsuccessful. The patient underwent image-guided percutaneous translumbar type II endoleak repair using XperGuide (Philips, Andover, MA USA).

scholarly journals Collaural fistula (Work Type II first branchial cleft anomaly) with prolonged morbidity: A case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 2050313X2110145
Author(s):  
Dorji Penjor ◽  
Morimasa Kitamura
Keyword(s):  
External Auditory Canal ◽  
Fistulous Tract ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Complete Excision ◽  
Incision And Drainage ◽  
Branchial Cleft ◽  
Repeated Infections ◽  
Branchial Anomalies ◽  
Work Type

Collaural fistula is a very rare Work Type II first branchial cleft anomaly in which there is a complete fistulous tract between external auditory canal and the neck. Misdiagnosis and mismanagement can lead to prolonged morbidity and complications due to repeated infections. We present a case of an 18-year-old lady with a recurrent discharging sinus on her neck for 4 years. She has been treated with repeated incision and drainage and multiple antibiotics in the past. Otoscopic examination revealed an opening on the floor of the left external auditory canal. A diagnosis of an infected collaural fistula was made. Complete excision of the fistulous tract was done after treatment of the active infection. On follow-up, there was no further recurrence at 1 year. Sound knowledge of embryology of branchial anomalies with good history and examination is important to make correct and early diagnosis to prevent morbidity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document