Patient Satisfaction is Equivalent for Inpatient and Outpatient Minimally-Invasive Adrenalectomy

2022 ◽  
Vol 269 ◽  
pp. 207-211
Author(s):  
Richard Augusto Pigg ◽  
Jessica M. Fazendin ◽  
John R. Porterfield ◽  
Herbert Chen ◽  
Brenessa Lindeman
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy

scholarly journals Microsurgical unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed I. Refaat ◽  
Amr K. Elsamman ◽  
Adham Rabea ◽  
Mohamed I. A. Hewaidy
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Decompression Surgery ◽  
Microsurgical Decompression ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background The quest for better patient outcomes is driving to the development of minimally invasive spine surgical techniques. There are several evidences on the use of microsurgical decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar spine stenosis; however, few of these studies compared their outcomes with the traditional laminectomy technique. Objectives The aim of our study was to compare outcomes following microsurgical decompression via unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) of the spinal canal to the standard open laminectomy for cases with lumbar spinal stenosis. Subjects and methods Cases were divided in two groups. Group (A) cases were operated by conventional full laminectomy; Group (B) cases were operated by (ULBD) technique. Results from both groups were compared regarding duration of surgery, blood loss, perioperative complication, and postoperative outcome and patient satisfaction. Results There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the improvement of visual pain analogue, while improvement of neurogenic claudication outcome score was significant in group (B) than group (A). Seventy-three percent of group (A) cases and 80% of group (B) stated that surgery met their expectations and were satisfied from the outcome. Conclusion Comparing ULBD with traditional laminectomy showed the efficacy of the minimally invasive technique in obtaining good surgical outcome and patient satisfaction. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the occurrence of complications The ULBD technique was found to respect the posterior spinal integrity and musculature, accompanied with less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and shorter recovery periods than the open laminectomy technique.

Minimally Invasive Reduction of Intraarticular Calcaneal Fractures With Percutaneous Fixation Using Cannulated Screws Versus Kirschner Wires: A Retrospective Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 193864002098775
Author(s):  
Ahmed Shams ◽  
Osama Gamal ◽  
Mohamed Kamal Mesregah
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Cannulated Screws ◽  
Kirschner Wires ◽  
Calcaneal Fractures ◽  
K Wires ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Minimally Invasive Reduction

Background Several minimally invasive techniques were developed for management of intraarticular calcaneal fractures. This study aimed to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of 2 minimally invasive reduction and fixation techniques using cannulated screws or Kirschner wires (K-wires) for fixation. Methods This study was a retrospective comparative review of patients with displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures, who were treated with cannulated screws or K-wires techniques. Clinical and radiological data were collected and compared between both groups. Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction using the Maryland Foot Score (MFS) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain, in addition to the complications, were compared between both groups. Results In total, 70 patients were included in the study: 34 in the cannulated screws group, with a mean age of 35.2 ± 4 years, and 36 in the K-wires groups, with a mean age of 33.4 ± 3 years. The operative time was shorter in the K-wires group (40.5 ± 5.6 minutes) compared to the cannulated screw group (49.5 ± 4.5 minutes), P < .001. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding the radiological parameters, including Bohler’s angle, angle of Gissane, calcaneal width, height, or length. The mean MFS, mean VAS, and complications were not different between the 2 groups. Conclusion Treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures with minimally invasive reduction and fixation using either cannulated screws or K-wires can achieve similar excellent functional and radiological outcomes, with high patient satisfaction. The use of K-wires has the advantage of reduced operative time than cannulated screws. Levels of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective comparative study

scholarly journals Retrospective comparison of three minimally invasive approaches for adrenal tumors: perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopic, retroperitoneal laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy

BMC Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Changwei Ji ◽  
Qun Lu ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Feifei Zhang ◽  
Hao Ji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Adrenal Tumors ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy

Abstract Background To compare the perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopic (TLA), retroperitoneal laparoscopic (RLA), and robot-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic (RATLA) adrenalectomy for adrenal tumors in our center. Methods Between April 2012 and February 2018, 241 minimally invasive adrenalectomies were performed. Cases were categorized based on the minimally invasive adrenalectomy technique. Demographic characteristics, perioperative information and pathological data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results This study included 37 TLA, 117 RLA, and 87 RATLA procedures. Any two groups had comparable age, ASA score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and preoperative hemoglobin. The tumor size for RLA patients was 2.7 ± 1.1 cm, which was significantly smaller compared to patients who underwent TLA/RATLA (p = 0.000/0.000). Operative time was similar in any two groups, while estimated blood loss was lower for RATLA group (75.6 ± 95.6 ml) compared with the TLA group (131.1 ± 204.5 ml) (p = 0.041). Conversion to an open procedure occurred in only one (2.7%) patient in the TLA group for significant adhesion and hemorrhage. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of transfusion rate and complication rate. Length of stay was shorter for the RATLA group versus the TLA/RLA group (p = 0.000/0.029). In all groups, adrenocortical adenoma and pheochromocytoma were the most frequent histotypes. Conclusions Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is associated with expected excellent outcomes. In our study, the RATLA approach appears to provide the benefits of decreased estimated blood loss and length of stay. Robotic adrenalectomy appears to be a safe and effective alternative to conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with Incision Cosmesis After Standard and Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty

Orthopedics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne M. Goldstein ◽  
Rose Ali ◽  
Jill Jasperson Branson ◽  
Kimberly A. Berland
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip

Robotic-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy: Making a Good Procedure Even Better

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paxton V. Dickson ◽  
Gillian C. Alex ◽  
Elizabeth G. Grubbs ◽  
Camilo Jimenez ◽  
Jeffrey E. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Surgical Technology ◽  
Laparoscopic Operation ◽  
Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy ◽  
Postoperative Blood Transfusion ◽  
Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy

Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) is a minimally invasive procedure offering several advantages over a transabdominal laparoscopic operation. The three-dimensional optics and articulating instrumentation offered by current robotic surgical technology potentially improve this procedure. Robotic-assisted PRA (RA-PRA) was performed in patients meeting standard criteria for minimally invasive adrenalectomy. We prospectively collected demographic, clinical, perioperative, and pathologic data on patients undergoing RA-PRA. Thirty consecutive RA-PRAs were performed in 28 patients (26 unilateral and 2 bilateral). Indications for adrenalectomy included pheochromocytoma (8), hyperaldosteronism (3), hypercortisolism (8), oligometastases (5), and nonfunctional tumors (6). Mean tumor size was 3.8 ± 1.6 cm. Mean body mass index was 30.7 ± 6.5 kg/m2. Mean operative time was 154 ± 43 minutes for unilateral total adrenalectomy. Four patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia Type 2A-associated pheochromocytomas underwent cortical-preserving procedures. Three patients experienced perioperative complications (one pneumothorax, one urinary retention, one required postoperative blood transfusion). No patient required conversion to an open procedure. Robotic surgical technology is an excellent complement to retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy. The three-dimensional view and ergonomic advantages of a robotic procedure promote better visualization and a more flexible approach to dissection. We believe these features may optimize the ability to maintain a vascularized remnant during minimally invasive cortical-sparing adrenalectomy.

scholarly journals Instrumentation Removal following Minimally Invasive Posterior Percutaneous Pedicle Screw-Rod Stabilization (PercStab) of Thoracolumbar Fractures Is Not Always Required

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Neil Manson ◽  
Dana El-Mughayyar ◽  
Erin Bigney ◽  
Eden Richardson ◽  
Edward Abraham
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Rating Scales ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Mild Pain ◽  
Open Stabilization ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw

Study Design. Clinical case series. Background. Percutaneous stabilization for spinal trauma confers less blood loss, reduces postoperative pain, and is less invasive than open stabilization and fusion. The current standard of care includes instrumentation removal. Objective. 1. Reporting patient outcomes following minimally invasive posterior percutaneous pedicle screw-rod stabilization (PercStab). 2. Evaluating the results of instrumentation retention. Methods. A prospective observational study of 32 consecutive patients receiving PercStab without direct decompression or fusion. Baseline data demographics were collected. Operative outcomes of interest were operative room (OR) time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. Follow-up variables of interest included patient satisfaction, Numeric Rating Scales for Back and Leg (NRS-B/L) pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and return to work. Clinical outcome data (ODI and NRS-B/L) were collected at 3, 12, 24 months and continued at a 24-month interval up to a maximum of 8 years postoperatively. Results. 81.25% of patients (n = 26) retained their instrumentation and reported minimal disability, mild pain, and satisfaction with their surgery and returned to work (mean = 6 months). Six patients required instrumentation removal due to prominence of the instrumentation or screw loosening, causing discomfort/pain. Instrumentation removal patients reported moderate back and leg pain until removal occurred; after removal, they reported minimal disability and mild pain. Neither instrumentation removal nor retention resulted in complications or further surgical intervention. Conclusions. PercStab without instrumentation removal provided high patient satisfaction, mild pain, and minimal disability and relieved the patient from the burden of finances and resources allocation of a second surgery.

scholarly journals Relevant Insertion Site Anatomy of the Conventus Distal Radius System

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-345
Author(s):  
Jacob Duncan ◽  
Marc Trzeciak
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Kirschner Wire ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Minimally Invasive Approach ◽  
Lateral Aspect ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Application Methods

Background: The Conventus Distal Radius System (DRS) is an intramedullary fixation scaffold inserted into the lateral aspect of the distal radius. The purpose of this study was to identify insertion site anatomy to illustrate risks associated with the minimally invasive nature of radial-sided implant application. Methods: Ten cadavers were utilized. Using fluoroscopy, the 1.1-mm Kirschner wire and template was introduced per manufacturer’s guidelines, access guide assembled, and dissection carried out to the superficial radial nerve (SRN) with preservation of the native location. The access guide marked the insertion location for the side-cut drill. This point was measured in relationship to structures nearby, including the SRN, brachioradialis (BR), lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN), and radial styloid (RS). Results: The large guide contacted the SRN in 4 of 10 cadavers and was volar to it in 6 of 10. When volar, the mean distance was 1.7 mm. The tip of the RS to the large access guide averaged 44.5 mm. The small guide contacted the SRN in 2 of 10, was volar to it in 4 of 10, and between the bifurcation in 4 of 10. When volar, the distance averaged 3.25 mm. When bifurcated, the distance from the small guide to both the dorsal and volar branches was 3.5 mm. The distance from the RS to the small guide averaged 37.8 mm. The LABCN was found in the field of dissection in 4 of 10 cadavers. Conclusions: Several structures are at risk during insertion of the Conventus DRS; thus, knowledge of the relevant anatomy of this minimally invasive approach is crucial to optimize outcomes and patient satisfaction, and to avoid nerve injury.

Radiologic Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction after Minimally Invasive Unilateral Laminotomy and Bilateral Decompression in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (06) ◽  
pp. 475-483
Author(s):  
Seung-Kook Kim ◽  
Sungmo Ryu ◽  
Eun-Sang Kim ◽  
Sun-Ho Lee ◽  
Su-Chan Lee
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Lateral Recess ◽  
Lateral Recess Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Abstract Background and Study Aims Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common spinal disease in older adults. Although surgical modalities are recommended in patients who are unresponsive to conservative treatment, the most appropriate minimally invasive surgical procedure for patients with LSS remains controversial. Moreover, few previous studies have focused on patient-centered outcomes with radiologic correlation. In the present study, we aimed to investigate radiologic efficacy and patient satisfaction following bilateral decompression via unilateral laminotomy. Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of radiologic efficacy and patient satisfaction in a series of surgical patients treated at our institution. We classified patients into two groups based on the primary pathology (i.e., central or lateral recess stenosis). Medical records were analyzed retrospectively for radiologic outcomes and clinical parameters including pain and changes in quality of life. Data related to outcomes were collected at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery in the outpatient clinic. Results Among the 122 patients enrolled in this study, 51 had central spinal stenosis; 71 had lateral recess stenosis. Radiologically, we observed significant improvements in the anteroposterior diameter and cross-sectional area of the dural sac (central stenosis) and the lateral width of the central canal and depth of the lateral recess (lateral recess stenosis). Two weeks and 12 months after the surgical procedure, we observed significant improvements in the extent of symptoms, patient satisfaction, and quality of life (including physical function). Conclusion Our findings suggest that bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach shows improved radiologic outcomes, varying based on the type of stenosis. Furthermore, patient satisfaction significantly improved regardless of the type of disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document