Abdominal Body Contouring: Does Body Mass Index Affect Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes?

2022 ◽  
Vol 270 ◽  
pp. 348-358
Author(s):  
Adrienne N. Christopher ◽  
Martin P Morris ◽  
Viren Patel ◽  
Robyn B. Broach ◽  
John P. Fischer
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunjae Jeon ◽  
Melanie L. McGrath ◽  
Neal Grandgenett ◽  
Adam B. Rosen

Context: Patellar tendinopathy (PT) is prevalent in physically active populations, and it affects their quality of living, performance of activity, and may contribute to the early cessation of their athletic careers. A number of previous studies have identified contributing factors for PT; however, their contributions to self-reported dysfunction remain unclear. Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to determine if strength, flexibility, and various lower-extremity static alignments contributed to self-reported function and influence the severity of PT. Design: Cross-sectional research design. Setting: University laboratory. Participants: A total of 30 participants with PT volunteered for this study (age: 23.4 [3.6] y, height: 1.8 [0.1] m, mass: 80.0 [20.3] kg, body mass index: 25.7 [4.3]). Main Outcome Measures: Participants completed 7 different patient-reported outcomes. Isometric knee extension and flexion strength, hamstring flexibility and alignment measures of rearfoot angle, navicular drop, tibial torsion, q-angle, genu recurvatum, pelvic tilt, and leg length differences were assessed. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were assessed to determine significantly correlated outcome variables with each of the patient-reported outcomes. The factors with the highest correlations were used to identify factors that contribute the most to pain and dysfunction using backward selection, linear regression models. Results: Correlation analysis found significant relationships between questionnaires and body mass index (r = −.35–.46), normalized knee extension (r = .38–.50) and flexion strength (r = −.34–.50), flexibility (r = .32–.38, q-angle (r = .38–.56), and pelvic tilt (r = −.40). Regression models (R2 = .22–.54) identified thigh musculature strength and supine q-angle to have greatest predictability for severity in patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: These findings put an emphasis of bodyweight management, improving knee extensor and flexor strength, and posterior flexibility in PT patients.


Orthopedics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. e572-e577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eddie S. Wu ◽  
Jeffrey J. Cherian ◽  
Julio J. Jauregui ◽  
Kristin Robinson ◽  
Steven F. Harwin ◽  
...  

Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (25) ◽  
pp. e16055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ledibabari M. Ngaage ◽  
Jennifer Bai ◽  
Selim Gebran ◽  
Adekunle Elegbede ◽  
Chinezimuzo Ihenatu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praveen V. Mummaneni ◽  
Mohamad Bydon ◽  
John Knightly ◽  
Mohammed Ali Alvi ◽  
Anshit Goyal ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEDischarge to an inpatient rehabilitation facility or another acute-care facility not only constitutes a postoperative challenge for patients and their care team but also contributes significantly to healthcare costs. In this era of changing dynamics of healthcare payment models in which cost overruns are being increasingly shifted to surgeons and hospitals, it is important to better understand outcomes such as discharge disposition. In the current article, the authors sought to develop a predictive model for factors associated with nonroutine discharge after surgery for grade I spondylolisthesis.METHODSThe authors queried the Quality Outcomes Database for patients with grade I lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent a surgical intervention between July 2014 and June 2016. Only those patients enrolled in a multisite study investigating the impact of fusion on clinical and patient-reported outcomes among patients with grade I spondylolisthesis were evaluated. Nonroutine discharge was defined as those who were discharged to a postacute or nonacute-care setting in the same hospital or transferred to another acute-care facility.RESULTSOf the 608 patients eligible for inclusion, 9.4% (n = 57) had a nonroutine discharge (8.7%, n = 53 discharged to inpatient postacute or nonacute care in the same hospital and 0.7%, n = 4 transferred to another acute-care facility). Compared to patients who were discharged to home, patients who had a nonroutine discharge were more likely to have diabetes (26.3%, n = 15 vs 15.7%, n = 86, p = 0.039); impaired ambulation (26.3%, n = 15 vs 10.2%, n = 56, p < 0.001); higher Oswestry Disability Index at baseline (51 [IQR 42–62.12] vs 46 [IQR 34.4–58], p = 0.014); lower EuroQol-5D scores (0.437 [IQR 0.308–0.708] vs 0.597 [IQR 0.358–0.708], p = 0.010); higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (3 or 4: 63.2%, n = 36 vs 36.7%, n = 201, p = 0.002); and longer length of stay (4 days [IQR 3–5] vs 2 days [IQR 1–3], p < 0.001); and were more likely to suffer a complication (14%, n = 8 vs 5.6%, n = 31, p = 0.014). On multivariable logistic regression, factors found to be independently associated with higher odds of nonroutine discharge included older age (interquartile OR 9.14, 95% CI 3.79–22.1, p < 0.001), higher body mass index (interquartile OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.31–3.25, p < 0.001), presence of depression (OR 4.28, 95% CI 1.96–9.35, p < 0.001), fusion surgery compared with decompression alone (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6, p < 0.001), and any complication (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.4–10.9, p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSIn this multisite study of a defined cohort of patients undergoing surgery for grade I spondylolisthesis, factors associated with higher odds of nonroutine discharge included older age, higher body mass index, presence of depression, and occurrence of any complication.


2013 ◽  
Vol 66 (suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. 77-83
Author(s):  
Branislav Gvozdenovic ◽  
Violeta Mihailovic-Vucinic ◽  
Mira Vukovic ◽  
Aleksandar Gvozdenovic ◽  
Aleksandra Dudvarski-Ilic ◽  
...  

Introduction. The most frequent clinical outcomes in sarcoidosis patients are typically focused on the objective measurements of functions of the involved organs, but, generally, they do not take into account the individual perception of patients? everyday functioning. The aim of this study was to determine the type of association between the subjective disease outcomes and other objective conventional parameters in patients with sarcoidosis. Material and Methods. In the cross-sectional study including 172 sarcoidosis patients (122 females), quality of life was measured by a generic instrument, i.e. fifteen-dimensional measure of health-related quality of life together with a respiratory specific instrument, i.e. St George?s Respiratory Questionnaire; symptoms of fatigue were measured by Fatigue Scale and dyspnea was measured by the Basal Dyspnea Index. Body-mass index and the course of the disease (acute vs. chronic) were also evaluated. Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry. Results. Acute sarcoidosis was present in 48 (28%) patients. Mean body mass index was 27.01?5.2. Only 20 (12%) patients had lower forced expiratory volume in one second values (<80%) that indicated the existance of obstructive ventilatory impairment. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that body mass index, clinical course of disease and spirometric parameter forced expiratory volume in one second were the significant predictors (R2=0.929, p<0.01) of sarcoidosis related fatigue (B=0.061, B=0.406, B=0.452; respectively). Body mass index and forced expiratory volume in one second were the only parameters that significantly predicted both patients? quality of life (R2=0.932; B=0.017, B=0.263) and dyspnea (R2=0.847; B=0.025, B=0.668). Conclusions. It is important to measure both subjective patient-reported outcomes and objective disease parameters in sarcoidosis since they represent different aspects of the disease. All applied measuring instruments for the examined subjective outcomes demonstrated good measuring properties.


2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Kodumuri ◽  
S Raghuvanshi ◽  
R Bommireddy ◽  
Z Klezl

Introduction The aetiology of coccydynia can be multifactorial, with several associated factors such as obesity, female gender and low mood. The long-term results of operative interventions, such as manipulation under anaesthesia and coccygectomy are variable, ranging from 63–90%. Materials and methods Our aim was to identify whether age, trauma and body mass index (BMI) were independent prognostic factors in coccydynia treatment. All patients who presented to the Royal Derby Hospital with a primary diagnosis of coccydynia between January 2011 and January 2015 who had injections, manipulation under anaesthesia or coccygectomy were included. We used patient-reported satisfaction score as the primary outcome measure. We hypothesised that patients with preceding history of trauma and with high BMI (> 25) would be less satisfied. We divided patient BMI into four groups, following World Health Organization guidelines: group A (18.5–24.9), group B (25–29.9), group C (30–39.9) and group D (> 40). Results A total of 748 patients were diagnosed with coccydynia. Of these, 201 patients had 381 injections, 40 had 98 manipulations under anaesthesia and 9 had coccygectomy. Mean age was 46.4 years; 26% of patients had trauma to the coccyx. The mean time to follow-up was 7.3 months. We found a statistically significant difference (P = 0.03) between satisfaction scores in groups B and D. Patients who had trauma improved significantly (P = 0.04). The odds ratio calculation of coccygectomy and BMI revealed a higher risk of coccygectomy in Group A. Discussion This is the first study to establish BMI and trauma as independent prognostic factors for coccydynia treatment. Our hypothesis that patients with higher BMI would have lower satisfaction levels has been proven true.


2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (6) ◽  
pp. 683-692
Author(s):  
◽  
Nicholas Arnold ◽  
Hiba Anis ◽  
Wael K. Barsoum ◽  
Michael R. Bloomfield ◽  
...  

Aims Thresholds for operative eligibility based on body mass index (BMI) alone may restrict patient access to the benefits of arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between BMI and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and to determine how many patients would have been denied improvements in PROMs if BMI cut-offs were to be implemented. Methods A prospective cohort of 3,449 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. The following one-year PROMs were evaluated: hip injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) pain, HOOS Physical Function Shortform (PS), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity, Veterans Rand-12 Physical Component Score (VR-12 PCS), and VR-12 Mental Component Score (VR-12 MCS). Positive predictive values for failure to improve and the number of patients denied surgery in order to avoid a failed improvement were calculated for each PROM at different BMI cut-offs. Results There was a trend to improved outcomes in terms of pain and function improvements with higher BMI. Patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 had median (Q1, Q3) HOOS pain improvements of 58 points (interquartile range (IQR) 41 to 70) and those with BMI 35 to 40 kg/m2 had median improvements of 55 (IQR 40 to 68). With a BMI cut-off of 30 kg/m2, 21 patients would have been denied a meaningful improvement in HOOS pain score in order to avoid one failed improvement. At a 35 kg/m2 cut-off, 18 patients would be denied improvement, at a 40 kg/m2 cut-off 21 patients would be denied improvement, and at a 45 kg/m2 cut-off 21 patients would be denied improvement. Similar findings were observed for HOOS-PS, UCLA, and VR-12 scores. Conclusion Patients with higher BMIs show greater improvements in PROMs. Using BMI alone to determine eligibility criteria did not improve the rate of clinically meaningful improvements. BMI thresholds prevent patients who may benefit the most from surgery from undergoing THA. Surgeons should consider PROMs improvements in determining eligibility for THA while balancing traditional metrics of preoperative risk stratification. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6):683–692.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document