Commitment, Monogamy and Sex/Relationship Satisfaction in Gay Male Couples

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e297-e298
Author(s):  
Linda de Villers ◽  
Leor Ram
Author(s):  
Mary Minten ◽  
Cass Dykeman

Relationship health impacts many other health outcomes, including physical and mental wellbeing and the health of children in the family system (Goeke-Morey, Cummings, & Papp, 2007; Jaremka, Glaser, Malarkey, & Kiecolt-Glaser, 2013; Jaremka, Lindgren, & Kiecolt-Glaser, 2013; Pihet, Bodenmann, Cina, Widmer, & Shantinath, 2007; Rappaport, 2013; Robles, Slatcher, Trombello, & McGinn, 2014). Despite the importance of relationship health, couples do not regularly seek support for maintaining their connection (Eubanks-Fleming & Cordova, 2012). Early intervention programs that provide support are a growing public health initiative (Cowan & Cowan, 2014). One brief early intervention program, the Marriage Checkup (MC), positively impacts relationship satisfaction, prevents decline, and improves health on other relationship variables such as intimacy (Cordova, 2014). To date, the MC research has included only heterosexual couples. This study explored the question, “What is the impact of a relationship wellness checkup on gay male couples’ relationship satisfaction?” Using single-subject multiple-baseline, multiple-probe design, this study extends MC research to include gay may couples. Findings showed that the MC positively influenced satisfaction (NAP .73) for the group overall. In an analysis of each couple, two of the three couples improved and one couple showed a slight decline in satisfaction. The likely confounding event for this third couple was their marriage and honeymoon during the baseline phase. In light of research with newlywed and engaged couples from other studies, overall the results tentatively suggest the MC may increase satisfaction for gay male couples with additional research needed for newlywed couples.


2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelica Todosijevic ◽  
Esther D. Rothblum ◽  
Sondra E. Solomon

Relationship satisfaction, affect, and stress were examined in 313 same-sex couples who had had civil unions in Vermont during the first year of this legislation. Similarity between partners on age and on positive/negative affectivity was related to relationship satisfaction whereas there was no association with similarity in income, education, and outness. Lesbian couples ( n = 199), compared to gay male couples, reported experiencing more stress related to family reaction to their sexuality, whereas gay male couples ( n = 114) reported more stress surrounding the issues of HIV/AIDS and violence/harassment than did lesbian couples. This study is the first to examine within-couple factors among same-sex couples with legalized relationships.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyrel J. Starks ◽  
Kendell M. Doyle ◽  
Brett M. Millar ◽  
Jeffrey T. Parsons

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey B. Harris ◽  
Sally D. Stabb ◽  
Theodore R. Burnes

1997 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Smith ◽  
Robert A. Brown

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 262-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason W. Mitchell

Prior studies with men who have sex with men have documented a strong association between substance use with sex and risk for acquisition of HIV. However, few studies have been conducted about gay male couples’ use of substances with sex, despite the fact that between one third and two thirds of men who have sex with men acquire HIV from their relationship partners. The present study sought to (1) describe whether one or both partners in the male couple uses substances with sex—by substance type—within and/or outside of their relationship, and (2) assess whether differences exist in those who use substances with sex within and outside the relationship by the couples’ HIV status. Dyadic data for this analysis were collected in the United States from a nation-wide cross-sectional Internet study about male couples’ relationships and behaviors. Couple-level descriptive and comparative analyses were employed with 361 male couples. Except for alcohol, most couples did not use substances with sex. Of those who did, rates of who used it with sex and substance type within the relationship varied; most couples only had one partner who used substances with sex outside the relationship. Significantly higher proportions of concordantly HIV-negative and HIV-positive couples had both partners who used substances (all types) with sex within their relationship over discordant couples. Most couples had one partner who used outside the relationship; only marijuana and erectile dysfunction medication use with sex significantly differed by couples’ HIV status. Findings indicate the need to conduct additional research for prevention development.


2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 1349-1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klára Bártová ◽  
Zuzana Štěrbová ◽  
Lenka Martinec Nováková ◽  
Jakub Binter ◽  
Marco Antonio Corrêa Varella ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document