scholarly journals P2.11-38 Creating a Successful Multidisciplinary Conference for Review of Suspicious Lung Nodules

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. S809
Author(s):  
D. Dyer ◽  
P. Zelarney ◽  
J. Finigan ◽  
L. Carr ◽  
E. Kern
Author(s):  
Xiaoqi Lu ◽  
Yu Gu ◽  
Lidong Yang ◽  
Baohua Zhang ◽  
Ying Zhao ◽  
...  

Objective: False-positive nodule reduction is a crucial part of a computer-aided detection (CADe) system, which assists radiologists in accurate lung nodule detection. In this research, a novel scheme using multi-level 3D DenseNet framework is proposed to implement false-positive nodule reduction task. Methods: Multi-level 3D DenseNet models were extended to differentiate lung nodules from falsepositive nodules. First, different models were fed with 3D cubes with different sizes for encoding multi-level contextual information to meet the challenges of the large variations of lung nodules. In addition, image rotation and flipping were utilized to upsample positive samples which consisted of a positive sample set. Furthermore, the 3D DenseNets were designed to keep low-level information of nodules, as densely connected structures in DenseNet can reuse features of lung nodules and then boost feature propagation. Finally, the optimal weighted linear combination of all model scores obtained the best classification result in this research. Results: The proposed method was evaluated with LUNA16 dataset which contained 888 thin-slice CT scans. The performance was validated via 10-fold cross-validation. Both the Free-response Receiver Operating Characteristic (FROC) curve and the Competition Performance Metric (CPM) score show that the proposed scheme can achieve a satisfactory detection performance in the falsepositive reduction track of the LUNA16 challenge. Conclusion: The result shows that the proposed scheme can be significant for false-positive nodule reduction task.


2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 1810-1820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xujiong Ye ◽  
Xinyu Lin ◽  
J. Dehmeshki ◽  
G. Slabaugh ◽  
G. Beddoe

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve G. Langer ◽  
Brian D. Graner ◽  
Beth A. Schueler ◽  
Kenneth A. Fetterly ◽  
James M. Kofler ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bin Sun ◽  
Fengyin Liu ◽  
Yusun Zhou ◽  
Shaolei Jin ◽  
Qiang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayoshi Koike ◽  
Mie Yoshimura ◽  
Yasushi Mio ◽  
Shoichi Uezono

Abstract Background Surgical options for patients vary with age and comorbidities, advances in medical technology and patients’ wishes. This complexity can make it difficult for surgeons to determine appropriate treatment plans independently. At our institution, final decisions regarding treatment for patients are made at multidisciplinary meetings, termed High-Risk Conferences, led by the Patient Safety Committee. Methods In this retrospective study, we assessed the reasons for convening High-Risk Conferences, the final decisions made and treatment outcomes using conference records and patient medical records for conferences conducted at our institution from April 2010 to March 2018. Results A total of 410 High-Risk Conferences were conducted for 406 patients during the study period. The department with the most conferences was cardiovascular surgery (24%), and the reasons for convening conferences included the presence of severe comorbidities (51%), highly difficult surgeries (41%) and nonmedical/personal issues (8%). Treatment changes were made for 49 patients (12%), including surgical modifications for 20 patients and surgery cancellation for 29. The most common surgical modification was procedure reduction (16 patients); 4 deaths were reported. Follow-up was available for 21 patients for whom surgery was cancelled, with 11 deaths reported. Conclusions Given that some change to the treatment plan was made for 12% of the patients discussed at the High-Risk Conferences, we conclude that participants of these conferences did not always agree with the original surgical plan and that the multidisciplinary decision-making process of the conferences served to allow for modifications. Many of the modifications involved reductions in procedures to reflect a more conservative approach, which might have decreased perioperative mortality and the incidence of complications as well as unnecessary surgeries. High-risk patients have complex issues, and it is difficult to verify statistically whether outcomes are associated with changes in course of treatment. Nevertheless, these conferences might be useful from a patient safety perspective and minimize the potential for legal disputes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document