385 Background: Partial nephrectomy (PN) has reported equivalent oncologic outcomes with superior renal function outcomes when compared to radical nephrectomy (RN) for treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Whether PN provides adequate cancer control in high risk disease is unclear. To clarify, survival outcomes were compared between those who underwent RN and PN for high risk RCC. Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database patients with RCC who underwent PN or RN for a localized tumor ≤ 7cm were identified. Cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between those with high risk disease (defined as poorly or undifferentiated grade and/or pathologic stage T3) who underwent PN or RN. Results: Of 51,183 patients with localized RCC ≤ 7cm, 24.9% had high risk disease, 85.2% and 14.8% of which underwent RN and PN, respectively. Five-year CSS was superior in the PN group vs. the RN group (93.3% vs. 86.0%, p<0.001). On multivariable analysis undergoing RN was no longer predictive of CSS (HR 1.23, p=0.08). Similarly, 5-year OS was superior in the PN versus RN group (79.5% vs. 70.1%, p<0.001). RN remained independently associated with poor OS on multivariable analysis (HR 1.16, p=0.031). Propensity analysis accounting for factors affecting selection for type of nephrectomy produced similar results. RN did not influence CSS but portended a 20% increased risk of death from all causes (p=0.008). Conclusions: In patients with high risk RCC, partial nephrectomy is associated with improved OS and does not compromise cancer control as compared to radical nephrectomy.
Comparison of the oncological, perioperative and functional outcomes of partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical T1b renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies
