Therapeutic implications of cancer gene amplifications without mRNA overexpression: silence may not be golden

Amplifications of oncogenic genes are often considered actionable. However, not all patients respond. Questions have therefore arisen regarding the degree to which amplifications, especially non-focal ones, mediate overexpression. We found that a subset of high-level gene amplifications (≥ 6 copies) (from The Cancer Genome Atlas database) was not over-expressed at the RNA level. Unexpectedly, focal amplifications were more frequently silenced than non-focal amplifications. Most non-focal amplifications were not silenced; therefore, non-focal amplifications, if over-expressed, may be therapeutically tractable. Furthermore, specific silencing of high-level focal or non-focal gene amplifications may explain resistance to drugs that target the relevant gene product.

Gene therapy for chronic traumatic brain injury: Challenges to resolve long-term consequences of brain damage

: The promise of gene therapy is alluring not only for CNS disorders but also for other pathological conditions. Gene therapy employs the insertion of a healthy gene into the identified genome to replace or replenish genes responsible for pathological disorder or damage due to trauma. The last decade has seen a sea change in the understanding of vital aspects of gene therapy. Despite the complexity of traumatic brain injury (TBI), the advent of gene therapy in various neurodegenerative disorders has reinforced the ongoing efforts of alleviating TBI-related outcomes with gene therapy. The review highlights the genes modulated in response to TBI and evaluates their impact on the severity and duration of the injury. We reviewed strategies that pinpointed the most relevant gene targets to restrict debilitating events of brain trauma and utilize vector of choice to deliver the gene of interest at the appropriate site. We attempted to summarize the long-term neurobehavioral consequences of TBI due to numerous pathometabolic perturbations associated with a plethora of genes. Herein, we shed light on the basic pathological mechanisms of brain injury, genetic polymorphism in individuals susceptible to severe outcomes, modulation of gene expression due to TBI, and identification of genes for their possible use in gene therapy. The review also provided insights on the use of vectors and challenges in translations of this gene therapy to clinical practices.

Copy-Neutral Loss-of-Heterozygosity Adds Diagnostic and Prognostic Information to the Molecular Profiling of Hematological Malignancies

Background: Copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity (CN-LOH) - not detectable by chromosome banding analysis - is gaining importance as a prognostic factor and can either cause the duplication of an activating mutation in an oncogene, the deletion of a tumor suppressor gene or the gain/loss of specific methylated regions. However, examination for possible CN-LOH in hematological diagnostics is at present not routinely performed and, hence, data regarding the occurrence of CN-LOH across different entities as well as the association of relevant genes is limited. Aim: (1) Frequency assessment of CN-LOH by target enrichment sequencing (TES) in a diagnostic setting, (2) evaluation of whole genome sequencing (WGS) data to estimate the prevalence of CN-LOH in a larger cohort, to pinpoint relevant genes for CN-LOHs with so far unknown associations, and to determine cross-entity variability. Patients and Methods: 1196 patients (507 female, 689 male, median age: 66 years), sent between 04/2021-07/2021 for diagnostic work-up, were analyzed by TES with a median coverage of 1765x for the gene panel and 52x for the CNV spike-in panel (IDT, Coralville, IA). Amplification-free WGS libraries of 3851 different patients were sequenced with a median coverage of 102x. Reads were aligned to the human reference genome (GRCh37, Ensembl annotation, Isaac aligner). Cnvkit (v 0.9.9) was used to call copy number variations (CNVs) and CN-LOH for TES and HadoopCNV (Yang et al. 2017) was used to call CN-LOH for WGS. Results: 1196 patients were analyzed by TES. For 10% of the patients at least one CN-LOH event was detected without any association to age or gender but a slightly higher incidence in myeloid compared to lymphoid neoplasms (10% vs 6%). In 14 patients, CN-LOH affected more than one chromosome arm. CN-LOH occurred most frequently in 4q (n = 15), 7q (n = 16), 9p (n = 25) and 11q (n = 10). As expected, 4q CN-LOH co-occurred with high variant allele frequencies (VAF) of TET2. Based on WGS data, 4q CN-LOH occurred predominately in AML (35%), CMML (22%), and MDS (20%). In rare cases, 4q CN-LOH was associated with FBXW7 variants in T-ALL. 7q CN-LOH occurred nearly exclusively in myeloid neoplasms (95%) and was associated with high VAFs in EZH2 in 69% of TES and 82% of WGS cases. CUX1 variants with high VAFs were detected in 80% (TES) and 45% (WGS) of the remaining cases, respectively. The well-known 9p CN-LOH led to JAK2V617F homozygosity in all myeloid neoplasms and occurred most often in MPNs. In T-ALL, regions of 9p CN-LOH harbored CDKN2A/B deletions. 11q CN-LOH occurred more often in myeloid than lymphoid neoplasms (79% vs 21%) and was associated with CBL variants in 61% and KMT2A-PTD in 19% of the cases. In contrast, ATM was the relevant gene in all lymphoid cases with 11q CN-LOH. CN-LOH in 11p was detected less frequently and only in 25% of cases an association with WT1 variants could be identified. Our WGS data confirmed the known associations between 1p CN-LOH and high allele burden in MPL, CSF3R and NRAS, 2p CN-LOH and DNMT3A variants, 13q CN-LOH and FLT3-ITD, the near exclusive occurrence of 16p CN-LOH in follicular lymphoma (FL, 98%) with high CREBBP-mutant allele burden , 17p CN-LOH and TP53 homozygosity, and the exclusive occurrence of 21q CN-LOH in AML and its association with RUNX1 mutations. Besides, 12q CN-LOH was associated with KMT2D in FL, with SH2B3 in MDS/MPN overlaps and in rare cases with KDM2B. For 17q CN-LOH the relevant gene was not unequivocally identifiable with high mutant allele variants in SRSF2, STAT5B, and NF1. 18q CN-LOH was a very rare event but consistently associated with a high VAF of MBD2, which presumably influences cell proliferation (Cheng et al. 2018). 19q CN-LOH was mostly (63%) associated with a high VAF of CEBPA variants, except for patients with hairy cell leukemia: in these cases nonsense mutations in CIC (VAF > 90%) were detected. CN-LOH in 22q was more common in myeloid malignancies (65% vs 35%) and associated with PRR14L mutations in the majority of myeloid cases (62%). Of note, this association occurred neither in AML samples nor in lymphoid neoplasms. No recurrent mutations were found for 6p and 14q CN-LOHs. For all other chromosomes, CN-LOH events were very rare. Conclusions: By using a CNV spike-in panel, TES adds additional diagnostic and prognostic information by enabling simultaneous detection of selected gene mutations and genome-wide CNVs, as well as CN-LOH, without increase in sequencing costs and turn-around times. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Haferlach: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Other: Part ownership. Kern: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Other: Part ownership. Haferlach: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Other: Part ownership.