scholarly journals Claims data algorithms for identifying incident breast cancer (BC) cases and cancer disease stage: a critical review of the literature

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. A22
Author(s):  
K. Foley ◽  
N. Shi ◽  
A. Girvan ◽  
K.C. Ward ◽  
J. Lipscomb
2000 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 605-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean L Freeman ◽  
Dong Zhang ◽  
Daniel H Freeman ◽  
James S Goodwin

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 813-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy C. Miles ◽  
Christoph I. Lee ◽  
Qin Sun ◽  
Aasthaa Bansal ◽  
Gary H. Lyman ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground: The purpose of this study was to assess advanced imaging (bone scan, CT, or PET/CT) and serum tumor biomarker use in asymptomatic breast cancer survivors during the surveillance period. Patients and Methods: Cancer registry records for 2,923 women diagnosed with primary breast cancer in Washington State between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2014, were linked with claims data from 2 regional commercial insurance plans. Clinical data including demographic and tumor characteristics were collected. Evaluation and management codes from claims data were used to determine advanced imaging and serum tumor biomarker testing during the peridiagnostic and surveillance phases of care. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify clinical factors and patterns of peridiagnostic imaging and biomarker testing associated with surveillance advanced imaging. Results: Of 2,923 eligible women, 16.5% (n=480) underwent surveillance advanced imaging and 31.8% (n=930) received surveillance serum tumor biomarker testing. Compared with women diagnosed before the launch of the Choosing Wisely campaign in 2012, later diagnosis was associated with lower use of surveillance advanced imaging (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52–0.89). Factors significantly associated with use of surveillance advanced imaging included increasing disease stage (stage III: OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.48–5.38), peridiagnostic advanced imaging use (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.33–2.31), and peridiagnostic serum tumor biomarker testing (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01–1.80). Conclusions: Although use of surveillance advanced imaging in asymptomatic breast cancer survivors has declined since the launch of the Choosing Wisely campaign, frequent use of surveillance serum tumor biomarker testing remains prevalent, representing a potential target for further efforts to reduce low-value practices.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Hathaway ◽  
Peter Paetsch ◽  
Yali Li ◽  
Jincao Wu ◽  
Sam Asgarian ◽  
...  

PurposeTo evaluate mammography uptake and subsequent breast cancer diagnoses, as well as the prospect of additive cancer detection via a liquid biopsy multi-cancer early detection (MCED) screening test during a routine preventive care exam (PCE).MethodsPatients with incident breast cancer were identified from five years of longitudinal Blue Health Intelligence® (BHI®) claims data (2014-19) and their screening mammogram and PCE utilization were characterized. Ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the association of a biennial screening mammogram with stage at diagnosis. Additional screening opportunities for breast cancer during a PCE within two years before diagnosis were identified, and the method extrapolated to all cancers, including those without recommended screening modalities.ResultsClaims for biennial screening mammograms and the time from screening to diagnosis were found to be predictors of breast cancer stage at diagnosis. When compared to women who received a screening mammogram proximal to their breast cancer diagnosis (0-4 months), women who were adherent to guidelines but had a longer time window from their screening mammogram to diagnosis (4-24 months) had a 87% increased odds of a later-stage (stages III or IV) breast cancer diagnosis (p-value <0.001), while women with no biennial screening mammogram had a 155% increased odds of a later-stage breast cancer diagnosis (p-value <0.001). This highlights the importance of screening in the earlier detection of breast cancer. Of incident breast cancer cases, 23% had no evidence of a screening mammogram in the two years before diagnosis. However, 49% of these women had a PCE within that time. Thus, an additional 11% of breast cancer cases could have been screened if a MCED test had been available during a PCE. Additionally, MCED tests have the potential to target up to 58% of the top 5 cancers that are the leading causes of cancer death currently without a USPSTF recommended screening modality (prostate, pancreatic, liver, lymphoma, and ovarian cancer).ConclusionThe study used claims data to demonstrate the association of cancer screening with cancer stage at diagnosis and demonstrates the unmet potential for a MCED screening test which could be ordered during a PCE.


Author(s):  
Daniela Alterio ◽  
Eliana La Rocca ◽  
Stefania Volpe ◽  
Anna Maria Camarda ◽  
Alessia Casbarra ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (6p1) ◽  
pp. 1733-1750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann B. Nattinger ◽  
Purushottam W. Laud ◽  
Ruta Bajorunaite ◽  
Rodney A. Sparapani ◽  
Jean L. Freeman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document