scholarly journals Comparison Of Conversion Rates Between Robotic-Assisted And Laparoscopic Anterior Rectal Resection For Rectal Cancer: Which Patients And Providers Could Benefit Most From Robotic-Assisted Surgery?

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. A136-A137
Author(s):  
S Ackerman ◽  
S Daniel ◽  
R Baik ◽  
A Andreasen ◽  
E Liu ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Kasai ◽  
Hitoshi Hino ◽  
Akio Shiomi ◽  
Hiroyasu Kagawa ◽  
Shoichi Manabe ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 1010-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Allemann ◽  
Céline Duvoisin ◽  
Luca Di Mare ◽  
Martin Hübner ◽  
Nicolas Demartines ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shubang Cheng ◽  
Bolin He ◽  
Xueyi Zeng

Objective: Anastomotic Leakage (AL) is one of the most common complications after resection of rectal cancer. Recognition of the incidence and risk factors related to AL is important. This study aimed develops a model that can predict anastomotic leakage after anterior rectal resection. Methods: Data from 188 patients undergoing anterior resection of rectal cancer were collected for retrospective analysis. Patients were randomly divided in the development set and validation set at a 1:1 ratio. We first included age, sex, preoperative chemoradiotherapy, tumor size, degree of tumor differentiation, stage, TNM stage, lymph vascular invasion, distance, anastomotic method, diabetes, intraoperative time, intraoperative bleeding and smoking as candidates for variable selection with a LASSO method. A ROC curve was constructed with the validation set to assess the accuracy of the prediction model. Results: AL occurred in 20 of 188 patients (10.6%). Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (p=0.04), medium degree of tumor differentiation (p=0.04), anastomotic method (p<0.01), intraoperative bleeding≥400ml (p<0.01), smoking (p<0.01), diabetes (p<0.01) were significantly related to AL. The area under the ROC curve of the prediction model is 0.952. Conclusions: This study developed a model that can predict anastomotic leakage after anterior rectal resection, which may aid the selection of preventive ileostomy and postoperative management. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.3.252 How to cite this:Cheng S, He B, Zeng X. Prediction of anastomotic leakage after anterior rectal resection. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(3):830-835.  doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.3.252 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 4886-4892 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Duchalais ◽  
N. Machairas ◽  
S. R. Kelley ◽  
R. G. Landmann ◽  
A. Merchea ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 549-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Marquardt ◽  
Ph. Koppes ◽  
D. Weimann ◽  
Th. Schiedeck

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Viet Trung Lam ◽  

Abstract Introduction: Conventional laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer has several challenges regarding the technique issues such as a limited range of motion instruments. With the advantages, Robotic-assisted surgery has resolved this problems compared with the conventional laparoscopic surgery because it’s dexterity could improve the range of motion instruments. To evaluate the short-term and early oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal cancer. Material and Methods: Prospective study to describe one consecutive series of robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancer at Department of Digestive Surgery of Cho Ray hospital. Results: Between October 2017 and June 2018, robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection with total mesorectal excision has performed on 15 consecutive patients with rectal cancer at Cho Ray hospital. The mean age was 50. Male/ female ratio was 2.75/1. The types of procedures performed were: 13 low anterior resections (LAR), 1 intersphincteric resection with coloanal anastomosis, and 1 abdominoperineal resection (APR). The overall mean operation time was 240 minutes. None of the cases was converted to open procedure. Mean harvested lymph nodes were 12. There was no surgical morbidity or mortality. On the postoperative day 1 and 2, mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores were 3.5. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.5 days. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancer is a feasible and safe procedure with acceptable oncological results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document