scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness of Incobotulinumtoxin-A In The Longer-Term Management of Post-Stroke Spasticity of The Upper Limb

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. A724
Author(s):  
K Makino ◽  
D Tilden ◽  
C Guarnieri ◽  
M Mudge ◽  
I Baguley
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn S. Hayward ◽  
Sharon F. Kramer ◽  
Vincent Thijs ◽  
Julie Ratcliffe ◽  
Nick S. Ward ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 773-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. V. Doan ◽  
P. Gillard ◽  
A. Brashear ◽  
M. Halperin ◽  
E. Hayward ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 758
Author(s):  
Songjin Ri ◽  
Anatol Kivi ◽  
Jörg Wissel

There are few reports on the safety and effectiveness of long-term botulinumtoxin A (BoNT A) therapy in severe chronic pain of post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). The literature was searched with the term “neuropathic pain” and “botulinum” on PubMed (up to 29 February 2020). Pain was assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) before and after BoNT A therapy. A total of 10 clinical trials and six case reports including 251 patients with PHN were presented. They showed that BoNT A therapy had significant pain reduction (up to 30–50%) and improvement in quality of life. The effect duration seems to be correlated with BoNT A doses injected per injection site. Intervals between BoNT A injections were 10–14 weeks. No adverse events were reported in cases and clinical studies, even in the two pregnant women, whose babies were healthy. The repeated (≥6 times) intra/subcutaneous injections of incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin®, Merz Pharmaceuticals, Germany) over the two years of our three cases showed marked pain reduction and no adverse events. Adjunctive local BoNT A injection is a promising option for severe PHN, as a safe and effective therapy in long-term management for chronic neuropathic pain. Its effect size and -duration seem to be depended on the dose of BoNT A injected per each point.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Gloria Perini ◽  
Rita Bertoni ◽  
Rune Thorsen ◽  
Ilaria Carpinella ◽  
Tiziana Lencioni ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Functional recovery of the plegic upper limb in post-stroke patients may be enhanced by sequentially applying a myoelectrically controlled FES (MeCFES), which allows the patient to voluntarily control the muscle contraction during a functional movement and robotic therapy which allows many repetitions of movements. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy of MeCFES followed by robotic therapy compared to standard care arm rehabilitation for post-stroke patients. METHODS: Eighteen stroke subjects (onset ⩾ 3 months, age 60.1 ± 15.5) were recruited and randomized to receive an experimental combination of MeCFES during task-oriented reaching followed by robot therapy (MRG) or same intensity conventional rehabilitation care (CG) aimed at the recovery of the upper limb (20 sessions/45 minutes). Change was evaluated through Fugl-Meyer upperextremity (FMA-UE), Reaching Performance Scale and Box and Block Test. RESULTS: The experimental treatment resulted in higher improvement on the FMA-UE compared with CG (P= 0.04), with a 10 point increase following intervention. Effect sizes were moderate in favor of the MRG group on FMA-UE, FMA-UE proximal and RPS (0.37–0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings indicate that a combination of MeCFES and robotic treatment may be more effective than standard care for recovery of the plegic arm in persons > 3 months after stroke. The mix of motor learning techniques may be important for successful rehabilitation of arm function.


2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 312-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ron Goeree ◽  
Bernie J. O'Brien ◽  
Gordon Blackhouse ◽  
John Marshall ◽  
Andrew Briggs ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document