scholarly journals 4:21 PM Abstract No. 90 Predictors of 90-day mortality in Y90 radioembolization for hepatic metastatic disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. S42
Author(s):  
E. Priddy ◽  
M. Khan ◽  
D. Coldwell ◽  
M. Potts
Folia Medica ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-187
Author(s):  
Dimitar K. Penchev ◽  
Lilyana V. Vladova ◽  
Miroslav Z. Zashev ◽  
Radosvet P. Gornev

Abstract Aim: To assess the effect of the factor ‘hepatic metastatic disease’ on long-term outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. Materials and methods: We analysed retrospectively 200 randomly selected patients. Forty-two of them were excluded from the study for different reasons so the study contingent was 158 patients over a period of 23 years. All were diagnosed and treated in the Lozenetz University Hospital, in the Department of General Surgery. 125 of the patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer without distant metastases and 33 of the patients had liver metastases as a result of colorectal carcinoma. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19 IMB, with a level of significance of P < 0.05 at which the null hypothesis is rejected. We also used descriptive analysis, Kaplan-Meier estimator, Log-Rank Test and Life-Table statistics models. Results: The median survival for patients without metastases was 160 months, and the median was 102 months. The median survival for patients with liver metastases was 28 months and the median was 21 months. One-year survival for patients without metastases was 92% versus 69% in patients with liver metastases. Conclusion: Average, annual and median survivals are influenced statistically significantly by the presence of liver metastases compared to overall survival and that of patients without metastatic colorectal cancer. Liver metastatic disease is a proven factor affecting long-term prognosis and survival in patients with colorectal cancer.


Hepatology ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Williams ◽  
Edward R. Sherwood ◽  
Rose B. McNamee ◽  
Ernest L. Jones ◽  
Nicholas R. Di Luzio

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 467-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard R. Henry ◽  
Richard B. Hostetter ◽  
Brittany Ressler ◽  
Ingrid Bowser ◽  
Min Yan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 511-511
Author(s):  
Bhargavi Ghanta ◽  
Thavam C. Thambi-Pillai ◽  
Gary Timmerman ◽  
Christopher Fischer ◽  
Annie Nelson ◽  
...  

511 Background: Guidelines do not recommend routine FDG PET/CT (PET) as preoperative staging for pancreatic cancer, although many single center series have demonstrated that PET can lead to changes in management in a sizable minority of patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing PET for potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma at our institution to help define the utility of PET in this setting. Methods: We reviewed patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosed at our center from June 2010 to May 2017 and included patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma felt to be potentially resectable following standard staging studies [computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)] who also underwent preoperative PET. Data collected and analyzed included: demographics, pre-PET staging, CA19-9 levels, PET results and surgical outcomes. Results: Forty eight patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma felt to be surgically resectable underwent PET. PET changed management in 4/48 (8.3%) of these patients. In all 4 of these patients, hepatic metastatic disease was detected on PET and planned surgery was canceled; metastatic disease was confirmed by biopsy in 1 of these patients. 1/48 (2.1%) of patients had a false positive PET scan, where a focus of suspected metastatic disease on PET was biopsied and found to be benign, allowing the patient to proceed to surgery. 3/48 (6.3%) of patients had a false negative PET; 2 patients had hepatic metastatic disease and one had peritoneal disease discovered during surgery. Mean time from negative PET to surgery in these 3 patients was 31 days (range 21-45). Degree of CA19-9 elevation and primary tumor FDG avidity did not correlate with detection of metastatic disease on PET. Conclusions: PET changed management in a smaller number of patients in this cohort than in many previously reported series with a nearly equal number of patients with false negative PET results proceeding to unnecessary surgery. These results are consistent with the currently uncertain role of PET in preoperative staging for pancreatic cancer and further work must be undertaken to optimize presurgical staging in this population.


Author(s):  
C. Alberto ◽  
R. Snchez ◽  
F. Piniella ◽  
D. Pescador ◽  
G. Borobio ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S348
Author(s):  
G. Costantini ◽  
A. Broglia ◽  
G. Lionetto ◽  
E. Monti ◽  
S. Delfanti ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document