A multidisciplinary effort to assign realistic source parameters to models of volcanic ash-cloud transport and dispersion during eruptions

2009 ◽  
Vol 186 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 10-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.G. Mastin ◽  
M. Guffanti ◽  
R. Servranckx ◽  
P. Webley ◽  
S. Barsotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Volcanic Ash Cloud ◽  
Ash Cloud

scholarly journals Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling at the London VAAC: A Review of Developments since the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull Volcano Ash Cloud

Atmosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances M. Beckett ◽  
Claire S. Witham ◽  
Susan J. Leadbetter ◽  
Ric Crocker ◽  
Helen N. Webster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Dispersion Model ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Atmospheric Dispersion ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Dispersion Modelling ◽  
Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling ◽  
Volcanic Ash Cloud ◽  
Atmospheric Dispersion Model ◽  
Ash Cloud

It has been 10 years since the ash cloud from the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull caused unprecedented disruption to air traffic across Europe. During this event, the London Volcanic Ash Advisory Centre (VAAC) provided advice and guidance on the expected location of volcanic ash in the atmosphere using observations and the atmospheric dispersion model NAME (Numerical Atmospheric-Dispersion Modelling Environment). Rapid changes in regulatory response and procedures during the eruption introduced the requirement to also provide forecasts of ash concentrations, representing a step-change in the level of interrogation of the dispersion model output. Although disruptive, the longevity of the event afforded the scientific community the opportunity to observe and extensively study the transport and dispersion of a volcanic ash cloud. We present the development of the NAME atmospheric dispersion model and modifications to its application in the London VAAC forecasting system since 2010, based on the lessons learned. Our ability to represent both the vertical and horizontal transport of ash in the atmosphere and its removal have been improved through the introduction of new schemes to represent the sedimentation and wet deposition of volcanic ash, and updated schemes to represent deep moist atmospheric convection and parametrizations for plume spread due to unresolved mesoscale motions. A good simulation of the transport and dispersion of a volcanic ash cloud requires an accurate representation of the source and we have introduced more sophisticated approaches to representing the eruption source parameters, and their uncertainties, used to initialize NAME. Finally, upper air wind field data used by the dispersion model is now more accurate than it was in 2010. These developments have resulted in a more robust modelling system at the London VAAC, ready to provide forecasts and guidance during the next volcanic ash event.

scholarly journals Volcanic ash forecast using ensemble-based data assimilation: the Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter coupled with FALL3D-7.2 model (ETKF-FALL3D, version 1.0)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soledad Osores ◽  
Juan Ruiz ◽  
Arnau Folch ◽  
Estela Collini
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Joint Estimation ◽  
Volcanic Ash Cloud ◽  
Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter ◽  
Ensemble Transform ◽  
Ash Cloud ◽  
Ash Dispersal

Abstract. Quantitative volcanic ash cloud forecasts are prone to uncertainties coming from the source term quantification (e.g. eruption strength or vertical distribution of the emitted particles), with consequent implications on operational ash impact assessment. We present an ensemble-based data assimilation and forecast system for volcanic ash dispersal and deposition aimed at reducing uncertainties related to eruption source parameters. The FALL3D atmospheric dispersal model is coupled with the Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (ETKF) data assimilation technique by combining ash mass loading observations with ash dispersal simulations in order to obtain a better joint estimation of 3D ash concentration and source parameters. The ETKF-FALL3D data assimilation system is evaluated performing Observation System Simulation Experiments (OSSE) in which synthetic observations of fine ash mass loadings are assimilated. The evaluation of the ETKF-FALL3D system considering reference states of steady and time-varying eruption source parameters shows that the assimilation process gives both better estimations of ash concentration and time-dependent optimized values of eruption source parameters. The joint estimation of concentrations and source parameters leads to a better analysis and forecast of the 3D ash concentrations. Results show the potential of the methodology to improve volcanic ash cloud forecasts in operational contexts.

scholarly journals Volcanic ash forecast using ensemble-based data assimilation: an ensemble transform Kalman filter coupled with the FALL3D-7.2 model (ETKF–FALL3D version 1.0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soledad Osores ◽  
Juan Ruiz ◽  
Arnau Folch ◽  
Estela Collini
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Joint Estimation ◽  
Volcanic Ash Cloud ◽  
Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter ◽  
Ensemble Transform ◽  
Ash Cloud ◽  
Ash Dispersal

Abstract. Quantitative volcanic ash cloud forecasts are prone to uncertainties coming from the source term quantification (e.g., the eruption strength or vertical distribution of the emitted particles), with consequent implications for an operational ash impact assessment. We present an ensemble-based data assimilation and forecast system for volcanic ash dispersal and deposition aimed at reducing uncertainties related to eruption source parameters. The FALL3D atmospheric dispersal model is coupled with the ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF) data assimilation technique by combining ash mass loading observations with ash dispersal simulations in order to obtain a better joint estimation of the 3-D ash concentration and source parameters. The ETKF–FALL3D data assimilation system is evaluated by performing observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) in which synthetic observations of fine ash mass loadings are assimilated. The evaluation of the ETKF–FALL3D system, considering reference states of steady and time-varying eruption source parameters, shows that the assimilation process gives both better estimations of ash concentration and time-dependent optimized values of eruption source parameters. The joint estimation of concentrations and source parameters leads to a better analysis and forecast of the 3-D ash concentrations. The results show the potential of the methodology to improve volcanic ash cloud forecasts in operational contexts.

Dispersion Modelling at the London VAAC 10 Years after the Eyjafjallajökull Ash Cloud

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Beckett ◽  
Claire Witham ◽  
Susan Leadbetter ◽  
Ric Crocker ◽  
Helen Webster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Dispersion Model ◽  
Meteorological Data ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Atmospheric Dispersion ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Volcanic Ash Cloud ◽  
Atmospheric Dispersion Models ◽  
Ash Cloud

<p>It has been 10 years since the ash cloud from the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull caused chaos to air traffic across Europe. Although disruptive, the longevity of the event afforded the scientific community the opportunity to observe and extensively study the transport and dispersion of a volcanic ash cloud. Here we present the development of the NAME atmospheric dispersion model and modifications to its application in the London VAAC forecasting system since 2010, based on the lessons learned.</p><p>Our ability to represent both the vertical and horizontal transport of ash in the atmosphere and its removal have been improved through the introduction of new schemes to represent the sedimentation and wet deposition of volcanic ash, and updated schemes to represent deep atmospheric convection and parameterizations for plume spread due to unresolved mesoscale motions. A good simulation of the transport and dispersion of a volcanic ash cloud requires an accurate representation of the source and we have introduced more sophisticated approaches to representing the eruption source parameters, and their uncertainties, used to initialize NAME. Further, atmospheric dispersion models are driven by 3-dimensional meteorological data from Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models and the Met Office’s upper air wind field data is now more accurate than it was in 2010. These developments have resulted in a more robust modelling system at the London VAAC, ready to provide forecasts and guidance during the next volcanic ash event affecting their region.</p>

scholarly journals Volcanic ash cloud detection from space: a comparison between the RSTASHtechnique and the water vapour corrected BTD procedure

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Piscini ◽  
Stefano Corradini ◽  
Francesco Marchese ◽  
Luca Merucci ◽  
Nicola Pergola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapour ◽  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Cloud Detection ◽  
Volcanic Ash Cloud ◽  
Ash Cloud
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document