Dispersion Modelling at the London VAAC 10 Years after the Eyjafjallajökull Ash Cloud

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Beckett ◽  
Claire Witham ◽  
Susan Leadbetter ◽  
Ric Crocker ◽  
Helen Webster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Dispersion Model ◽  
Meteorological Data ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Atmospheric Dispersion ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Volcanic Ash Cloud ◽  
Atmospheric Dispersion Models ◽  
Ash Cloud

<p>It has been 10 years since the ash cloud from the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull caused chaos to air traffic across Europe. Although disruptive, the longevity of the event afforded the scientific community the opportunity to observe and extensively study the transport and dispersion of a volcanic ash cloud. Here we present the development of the NAME atmospheric dispersion model and modifications to its application in the London VAAC forecasting system since 2010, based on the lessons learned.</p><p>Our ability to represent both the vertical and horizontal transport of ash in the atmosphere and its removal have been improved through the introduction of new schemes to represent the sedimentation and wet deposition of volcanic ash, and updated schemes to represent deep atmospheric convection and parameterizations for plume spread due to unresolved mesoscale motions. A good simulation of the transport and dispersion of a volcanic ash cloud requires an accurate representation of the source and we have introduced more sophisticated approaches to representing the eruption source parameters, and their uncertainties, used to initialize NAME. Further, atmospheric dispersion models are driven by 3-dimensional meteorological data from Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models and the Met Office’s upper air wind field data is now more accurate than it was in 2010. These developments have resulted in a more robust modelling system at the London VAAC, ready to provide forecasts and guidance during the next volcanic ash event affecting their region.</p>

scholarly journals Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling at the London VAAC: A Review of Developments since the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull Volcano Ash Cloud

Atmosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances M. Beckett ◽  
Claire S. Witham ◽  
Susan J. Leadbetter ◽  
Ric Crocker ◽  
Helen N. Webster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Dispersion Model ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Atmospheric Dispersion ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Dispersion Modelling ◽  
Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling ◽  
Volcanic Ash Cloud ◽  
Atmospheric Dispersion Model ◽  
Ash Cloud

It has been 10 years since the ash cloud from the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull caused unprecedented disruption to air traffic across Europe. During this event, the London Volcanic Ash Advisory Centre (VAAC) provided advice and guidance on the expected location of volcanic ash in the atmosphere using observations and the atmospheric dispersion model NAME (Numerical Atmospheric-Dispersion Modelling Environment). Rapid changes in regulatory response and procedures during the eruption introduced the requirement to also provide forecasts of ash concentrations, representing a step-change in the level of interrogation of the dispersion model output. Although disruptive, the longevity of the event afforded the scientific community the opportunity to observe and extensively study the transport and dispersion of a volcanic ash cloud. We present the development of the NAME atmospheric dispersion model and modifications to its application in the London VAAC forecasting system since 2010, based on the lessons learned. Our ability to represent both the vertical and horizontal transport of ash in the atmosphere and its removal have been improved through the introduction of new schemes to represent the sedimentation and wet deposition of volcanic ash, and updated schemes to represent deep moist atmospheric convection and parametrizations for plume spread due to unresolved mesoscale motions. A good simulation of the transport and dispersion of a volcanic ash cloud requires an accurate representation of the source and we have introduced more sophisticated approaches to representing the eruption source parameters, and their uncertainties, used to initialize NAME. Finally, upper air wind field data used by the dispersion model is now more accurate than it was in 2010. These developments have resulted in a more robust modelling system at the London VAAC, ready to provide forecasts and guidance during the next volcanic ash event.

Exploring forecast variability during volcanic ash cloud events 

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Beckett ◽  
Ralph Burton ◽  
Fabio Dioguardi ◽  
Claire Witham ◽  
John Stevenson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Dispersion Model ◽  
Meteorological Data ◽  
Atmospheric Dispersion ◽  
Dispersion Models ◽  
British Geological Survey ◽  
Volcanic Ash Cloud ◽  
Ash Cloud

<p>Atmospheric transport and dispersion models are used by Volcanic Ash Advisory Centers (VAACs) to provide timely information on volcanic ash clouds to mitigate the risk of aircraft encounters. Inaccuracies in dispersion model forecasts can occur due to the uncertainties associated with source terms, meteorological data and model parametrizations. Real-time validation of model forecasts against observations is therefore essential to ensure their reliability. Forecasts can also benefit from comparison to model output from other groups; through understanding how different modelling approaches, variations in model setups, model physics, and driving meteorological data, impact the predicted extent and concentration of ash. The Met Office, the National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS) and the British Geological Survey (BGS) are working together to consider how we might compare data (both qualitatively and quantitatively) from the atmospheric dispersion models NAME, FALL3D and HYSPLIT, using meteorological data from the Met Office Unified Model and the NOAA Global Forecast System (providing an effective multi-model ensemble). Results from the model inter-comparison will be used to provide advice to the London VAAC to aid forecasting decisions in near real time during a volcanic ash cloud event. In order to facilitate this comparison, we developed a Python package (ash-model-plotting) to read outputs from the different models into a consistent structure. Here we present our framework for generating comparable plots across the different partners, with a focus on total column mass loading products. These are directly comparable to satellite data retrievals and therefore important for model validation. We also present outcomes from a recent modelling exercise and discuss next steps for further improving our forecast validation.</p>

scholarly journals Volcanic ash modeling with the NMMB-MONARCH-ASH model: quantification of offline modeling errors

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 4019-4038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Marti ◽  
Arnau Folch
Keyword(s):  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Atmospheric Dispersion ◽  
Volcanic Eruptions ◽  
Systematic Errors ◽  
Cloud Detection ◽  
Coupled Modeling ◽  
Evaluation Scores ◽  
Modeling Systems ◽  
Ash Cloud

Abstract. Volcanic ash modeling systems are used to simulate the atmospheric dispersion of volcanic ash and to generate forecasts that quantify the impacts from volcanic eruptions on infrastructures, air quality, aviation, and climate. The efficiency of response and mitigation actions is directly associated with the accuracy of the volcanic ash cloud detection and modeling systems. Operational forecasts build on offline coupled modeling systems in which meteorological variables are updated at the specified coupling intervals. Despite the concerns from other communities regarding the accuracy of this strategy, the quantification of the systematic errors and shortcomings associated with the offline modeling systems has received no attention. This paper employs the NMMB-MONARCH-ASH model to quantify these errors by employing different quantitative and categorical evaluation scores. The skills of the offline coupling strategy are compared against those from an online forecast considered to be the best estimate of the true outcome. Case studies are considered for a synthetic eruption with constant eruption source parameters and for two historical events, which suitably illustrate the severe aviation disruptive effects of European (2010 Eyjafjallajökull) and South American (2011 Cordón Caulle) volcanic eruptions. Evaluation scores indicate that systematic errors due to the offline modeling are of the same order of magnitude as those associated with the source term uncertainties. In particular, traditional offline forecasts employed in operational model setups can result in significant uncertainties, failing to reproduce, in the worst cases, up to 45–70 % of the ash cloud of an online forecast. These inconsistencies are anticipated to be even more relevant in scenarios in which the meteorological conditions change rapidly in time. The outcome of this paper encourages operational groups responsible for real-time advisories for aviation to consider employing computationally efficient online dispersal models.

scholarly journals Volcanic ash forecast using ensemble-based data assimilation: the Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter coupled with FALL3D-7.2 model (ETKF-FALL3D, version 1.0)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soledad Osores ◽  
Juan Ruiz ◽  
Arnau Folch ◽  
Estela Collini
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Joint Estimation ◽  
Volcanic Ash Cloud ◽  
Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter ◽  
Ensemble Transform ◽  
Ash Cloud ◽  
Ash Dispersal

Abstract. Quantitative volcanic ash cloud forecasts are prone to uncertainties coming from the source term quantification (e.g. eruption strength or vertical distribution of the emitted particles), with consequent implications on operational ash impact assessment. We present an ensemble-based data assimilation and forecast system for volcanic ash dispersal and deposition aimed at reducing uncertainties related to eruption source parameters. The FALL3D atmospheric dispersal model is coupled with the Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (ETKF) data assimilation technique by combining ash mass loading observations with ash dispersal simulations in order to obtain a better joint estimation of 3D ash concentration and source parameters. The ETKF-FALL3D data assimilation system is evaluated performing Observation System Simulation Experiments (OSSE) in which synthetic observations of fine ash mass loadings are assimilated. The evaluation of the ETKF-FALL3D system considering reference states of steady and time-varying eruption source parameters shows that the assimilation process gives both better estimations of ash concentration and time-dependent optimized values of eruption source parameters. The joint estimation of concentrations and source parameters leads to a better analysis and forecast of the 3D ash concentrations. Results show the potential of the methodology to improve volcanic ash cloud forecasts in operational contexts.

A multidisciplinary effort to assign realistic source parameters to models of volcanic ash-cloud transport and dispersion during eruptions

2009 ◽  
Vol 186 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 10-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.G. Mastin ◽  
M. Guffanti ◽  
R. Servranckx ◽  
P. Webley ◽  
S. Barsotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Volcanic Ash Cloud ◽  
Ash Cloud

scholarly journals Volcanic ash forecast using ensemble-based data assimilation: an ensemble transform Kalman filter coupled with the FALL3D-7.2 model (ETKF–FALL3D version 1.0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soledad Osores ◽  
Juan Ruiz ◽  
Arnau Folch ◽  
Estela Collini
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Joint Estimation ◽  
Volcanic Ash Cloud ◽  
Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter ◽  
Ensemble Transform ◽  
Ash Cloud ◽  
Ash Dispersal

Abstract. Quantitative volcanic ash cloud forecasts are prone to uncertainties coming from the source term quantification (e.g., the eruption strength or vertical distribution of the emitted particles), with consequent implications for an operational ash impact assessment. We present an ensemble-based data assimilation and forecast system for volcanic ash dispersal and deposition aimed at reducing uncertainties related to eruption source parameters. The FALL3D atmospheric dispersal model is coupled with the ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF) data assimilation technique by combining ash mass loading observations with ash dispersal simulations in order to obtain a better joint estimation of the 3-D ash concentration and source parameters. The ETKF–FALL3D data assimilation system is evaluated by performing observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) in which synthetic observations of fine ash mass loadings are assimilated. The evaluation of the ETKF–FALL3D system, considering reference states of steady and time-varying eruption source parameters, shows that the assimilation process gives both better estimations of ash concentration and time-dependent optimized values of eruption source parameters. The joint estimation of concentrations and source parameters leads to a better analysis and forecast of the 3-D ash concentrations. The results show the potential of the methodology to improve volcanic ash cloud forecasts in operational contexts.

scholarly journals Parameterizing Unresolved Mesoscale Motions in Atmospheric Dispersion Models

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 645-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen N. Webster ◽  
Thomas Whitehead ◽  
David J. Thomson
Keyword(s):  
Time Scales ◽  
Meteorological Data ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Strong Dependence ◽  
Atmospheric Dispersion ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Dispersion Models ◽  
Atmospheric Dispersion Models ◽  
Velocity Variances ◽  
Nwp Model

AbstractIn atmospheric dispersion models driven by meteorological data from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models, it is necessary to include a parameterization for plume spread that is due to unresolved mesoscale motions. These are motions that are not resolved by the input NWP data but are larger in size than the three-dimensional turbulent motions represented by turbulence parameterizations. Neglecting the effect of these quasi-two-dimensional unresolved mesoscale motions has been shown to lead to underprediction of plume spread and overprediction of concentrations within the plume. NWP modeling is conducted at a range of resolutions that resolve different scales of motion. This suggests that any parameterization of unresolved mesoscale motions should depend on the resolution of the input NWP data. Spectral analysis of NWP data and wind observations is used to assess the mesoscale motions unresolved by the NWP model. Appropriate velocity variances and Lagrangian time scales for these motions are found by calculating the missing variance in the energy spectra and analyzing correlation functions. A strong dependence on the resolution of the NWP data is seen, resulting in larger velocity variances and Lagrangian time scales from the lower-resolution models. A parameterization of unresolved mesoscale motions on the basis of the NWP resolution is proposed.

scholarly journals Volcanic ash cloud detection from space: a comparison between the RSTASHtechnique and the water vapour corrected BTD procedure

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Piscini ◽  
Stefano Corradini ◽  
Francesco Marchese ◽  
Luca Merucci ◽  
Nicola Pergola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapour ◽  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Cloud Detection ◽  
Volcanic Ash Cloud ◽  
Ash Cloud
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document