scholarly journals National trauma databank analysis of mortality and limb loss in isolated lower extremity vascular trauma

2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1598-1603 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Kauvar ◽  
Mark R. Sarfati ◽  
Larry W. Kraiss
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra P Frost ◽  
Tracy Norman Giest ◽  
Allison A Ruta ◽  
Teresa K Snow ◽  
Mindy Millard-Stafford

Background: Body composition is important for health screening, but appropriate methods for unilateral lower extremity amputees have not been validated. Objectives: To compare body mass index adjusted using Amputee Coalition equations (body mass index–Amputee Coalition) to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in unilateral lower limb amputees. Study design: Cross-sectional, experimental. Methods: Thirty-eight men and women with lower limb amputations (transfemoral, transtibial, hip disarticulation, Symes) participated. Body mass index (mass/height2) was compared to body mass index corrected for limb loss (body mass index–Amputee Coalition). Accuracy of classification and extrapolation of percent body fat with body mass index was compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results: Body mass index–Amputee Coalition increased body mass index (by ~ 1.1 kg/m2) but underestimated and mis-classified 60% of obese and overestimated 100% of lean individuals according to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Estimated mean percent body fat (95% confidence interval) from body mass index–Amputee Coalition (28.3% (24.9%, 31.7%)) was similar to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry percent body fat (29.5% (25.2%, 33.7%)) but both were significantly higher ( p < 0.05) than percent body fat estimated from uncorrected body mass index (23.6% (20.4%, 26.8%)). However, total errors for body mass index and body mass index–Amputee Coalition converted to percent body fat were unacceptably large (standard error of the estimate = 6.8%, 6.2% body fat) and the discrepancy between both methods and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was inversely related ( r = −0.59 and r = −0.66, p < 0.05) to the individual’s level of body fatness. Conclusions: Body mass index (despite correction) underestimates health risk for obese patients and overestimates lean, muscular individuals with lower limb amputation. Clinical relevance Clinical recommendations for an ideal body mass based on body mass index–Amputee Coalition should not be relied upon in lower extremity amputees. This is of particular concern for obese lower extremity amputees whose health risk might be significantly underestimated based on body mass index despite a “correction” formula for limb loss.


Injury ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 765-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Guerrero ◽  
Kathleen Gibson ◽  
Kurt A Kralovich ◽  
Iraklis Pipinos ◽  
Petros Agnostopolous ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
pp. 273-287
Author(s):  
David S. Kauvar ◽  
Brandon W. Propper

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. e223-e225
Author(s):  
Anthony Kronfli ◽  
Faiza Boukerche ◽  
Daniela Medina ◽  
Alex Geertsen ◽  
Akshilkumar Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Mainella ◽  
W Tomasz Majewski ◽  
Predrag Latkovich ◽  
Basil M. Michaels

2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 709-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann M O'Hare ◽  
Anton N Sidawy ◽  
Joe Feinglass ◽  
Kendra Magee Merine ◽  
Jennifer Daley ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (4) ◽  
pp. e107
Author(s):  
Elias K. Awad ◽  
Laura V. Veras ◽  
Kayla E. Leibl ◽  
Clay Kerby ◽  
Ankush Gosain ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document