Stress radiography findings in medial meniscus posterior root tears

The Knee ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 1542-1550
Author(s):  
Mehmet Argin ◽  
Ali Engin Dastan ◽  
Elcil Kaya Bicer ◽  
Huseyin Kaya ◽  
Emin Taskiran
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0024
Author(s):  
Aaron John Krych ◽  
Nick R. Johnson ◽  
Rohith Mohan ◽  
Diane L. Dahm ◽  
Bruce A. Levy ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
PO-JU WU ◽  
TsungYu Lin ◽  
Yung Chang Lu

Abstract Background:Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK) can lead to severe knee osteoarthritis predominantly localized to the medial compartment. We aimed to determine whether unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was an effective treatment for primary SONK.Methods:We analyzed the functional outcomes in 23 patients with SONK (with a magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]-confirmed diagnosis) who underwent UKA at a single center. The mean follow-up time was 67 months post-UKA.Results:Significant improvements in function were indicated by reduced Oxford Knee and Visual Analogue Scale scores after UKA, and there were no specific complications after the procedures. The incidence of MRI-identified medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) was 69.6% (16/23).Conclusion:Unicompartmental arthroplasty for SONK is less destructive to the native knee structure than total knee arthroplasty, but can achieve comparable prognosis with strict patient selection. While the precise etiology of SONK is unknown, one theory posits that a MMPRT may change the biomechanical circumstances of the knee joint, leading to osteonecrosis. Although not confirmatory, the high prevalence rate suggests that MMPRT may have a key role in the development of SONK. UKA is an effective treatment option for SONK, resulting in significant functional improvement. Long-term (>10 years) outcomes should be investigated.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 232596711987327
Author(s):  
Gilberto Y. Nakama ◽  
Zachary S. Aman ◽  
Hunter W. Storaci ◽  
Alexander S. Kuczmarski ◽  
Joseph J. Krob ◽  
...  

Background: Transtibial pull-out repair of the medial meniscal posterior root (MMPR) has been largely assessed through biomechanical studies. Biomechanically comparing different suture types would further optimize MMPR fixation and affect clinical care. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal suture material for MMPR fixation. It was hypothesized that ultra high–molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) suture tape would be biomechanically superior to UHMWPE suture and standard suture. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: The MMPR attachment was divided in 24 human cadaveric knees and randomly assigned to 3 repair groups: UHMWPE suture tape, UHMWPE suture, and standard suture. Specimens were dissected down to the medial meniscus, and the posterior root attachments were sectioned off the tibia. Two-tunnel transtibial pull-out repair with 2 sutures, as determined by the testing group, was performed. The repair constructs were cyclically loaded between 10 and 30 N at 0.5 Hz for 1000 cycles to mimic the forces experienced on the medial meniscus during postoperative rehabilitation. Displacement was recorded at 1, 50, 100, 500, and 1000 cycles. Ultimate failure load, displacement at failure, and load at 3 mm of displacement (clinical failure) were also recorded. Results: UHMWPE suture tape had significantly less displacement of the medial meniscus when compared with standard suture at 1 (–0.22 mm [95% CI, –0.41 to –0.02]; P = .025) and 50 (–0.35 mm [95% CI, –0.67 to –0.03]; P = .029) cycles. There were no other significant differences observed in displacement between groups at any number of cycles. UHMWPE suture tape had significantly less displacement at the time of failure than standard suture (–3.71 mm [95% CI, –7.17 to –0.24]; P = .034). UHMWPE suture tape had a significantly higher load to reach the clinical failure displacement of 3 mm than UHMWPE suture (15.64 N [95% CI, 0.02 to 31.26]; P = .05). There were no significant differences in ultimate failure load between groups. Conclusion: The meniscal root repair construct with UHMWPE suture tape may be stronger and less prone to displacement than that with standard suture or UHMWPE suture. Clinical Relevance: UHMWPE suture tape may provide better clinical results compared with UHMWPE suture and standard suture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document