scholarly journals Procedural justice and the implementation of community wind energy projects: A case study from South Yorkshire, UK

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 467-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Simcock
Energy Policy ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 7930-7940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Slattery ◽  
Eric Lantz ◽  
Becky L. Johnson

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 715-733
Author(s):  
Geneviève Pierre ◽  
Caroline Mazaud

Abstract This article focuses on the community acceptance of wind parks in a rural territory in western France, in a country where they are not much developed yet. We hypothetise that their set-up stems from a specific pattern, embedded in the territorial rural context of the case study. Semi-structured interviews with 30 actors aimed to analyse this citizen-led project, in line with their representations of this territory and its sustainable development. Results show that citizen-led investment is not a prerequisite for community acceptance in this case. The sense of a rural place that is fit for technologies kept up to date by the green industry, and the fairness of the process, are the strongest drivers for acceptance of wind energy, in general, in this case. Subsequently, the confidence obtained from previous fundraising actions can foster new participatory wind projects. An early communication with inhabitants, and a construction fit for a rural development that makes sense to the locals can bring an essential sense of trust for energy projects within the community. However, given the different definitions, it seems also critical to assess their true community dimension in order not to jeopardise the sense of fairness if the outcomes are not largely shared.


2020 ◽  
pp. 116247
Author(s):  
Angeliki Loukatou ◽  
Paul Johnson ◽  
Sydney Howell ◽  
Peter Duck

Author(s):  
Khalid Almutairi ◽  
Seyyed Shahabaddin Hosseini Dehshiri ◽  
Seyyed Jalaladdin Hosseini Dehshiri ◽  
Ali Mostafaeipour ◽  
Alibek Issakhov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Killean

Procedural justice advocates argue that fair procedures in decision making processes can increase participant satisfaction with legal institutions. Little critical work has been done however to explore the power of such claims in the context of mass violence and international criminal justice. This article critically examines some of the key claims of procedural justice by exploring the perceptions of justice held by victims participating as Civil Parties in the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (eccc). The eccc has created one of the most inclusive and extensive victim participation regimes within international criminal law. It therefore provides a unique case study to examine some of claims of ‘victim-centred’ transitional justice through a procedural justice lens. It finds that while procedural justice influenced civil parties’ overall perceptions of the Court, outcomes remained of primary importance. It concludes by analysing the possible reasons for this prioritisation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document