Which will carry more weight when CTR > 0.5, Solid Component Size, CTR, Tumor Size or SUVmax?

Lung Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaoyuan Zhang ◽  
Dong Lin ◽  
Yangli Yu ◽  
Qiqi Cao ◽  
Guobing Liu ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Tsutani ◽  
Yoshihisa Shimada ◽  
Hiroyuki Ito ◽  
Yoshihiro Miyata ◽  
Norihiko Ikeda ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify patients at a high risk of recurrence using preoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsA total of 567 patients who underwent screening and 1,216 who underwent external validation for clinical stage I NSCLC underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy. Staging was used on the basis of the 8th edition of the tumor–node–metastasis classification. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent prognostic factors for RFS.ResultsA multivariable Cox analysis identified solid component size (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30–2.12; P < 0.001) and pure solid type (HR, 1.82; 95% CI 1.11–2.96; P = 0.017) on HRCT findings as independent prognostic factors for RFS. When patients were divided into high-risk (n = 331; solid component size of >2 cm or pure solid type) and low-risk (n = 236; solid component size of ≤2 cm and part solid type) groups, there was a significant difference in RFS (HR, 5.33; 95% CI 3.09–9.19; 5-year RFS, 69.8% vs. 92.9%, respectively; P < 0.001). This was confirmed in the validation set (HR, 5.32; 95% CI 3.61–7.85; 5-year RFS, 72.0% vs. 94.8%, respectively; P < 0.001).ConclusionsIn clinical stage I NSCLC, patients with a solid component size of >2 cm or pure solid type on HRCT were at a high risk of recurrence.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 109-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideyuki Hayashi ◽  
Kazuto Ashizawa ◽  
Yukihiro Ogihara ◽  
Akifumi Nishida ◽  
Keitaro Matsumoto ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 287 (3) ◽  
pp. 1030-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Kamiya ◽  
Shingo Iwano ◽  
Hiroyasu Umakoshi ◽  
Rintaro Ito ◽  
Hironori Shimamoto ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-119
Author(s):  
Mariko Fukui ◽  
Kazuya Takamochi ◽  
Takehiro Ouchi ◽  
Yutaro Koike ◽  
Takashi Yaguchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Solid component size on thin-section computed tomography is used for T-staging according to the eighth edition of the Tumor Node Metastasis classification of lung cancer. However, the feasibility of using the solid component to measure clinical T-factor remains controversial. Methods We evaluated the feasibility of measuring the solid component in 859 tumours, which were suspected cases of primary lung cancers, requiring surgical resection regardless of the procedure or clinical stage. After excluding 126 pure ground-glass opacity tumours and 450 solid tumours, 283 part-solid tumours were analysed to determine the frequency of cases where the measurement of the solid portion was difficult along with the associated cause. Pathological invasiveness was also evaluated. Results The solid portion of 10 lesions in 283 part-solid nodules was difficult to measure due to an underlying lung disease (emphysema and pneumonitis). The solid portion of 62 lesions (21.9%) without emphysema and pneumonitis was difficult to measure due to imaging features of the tumours. Among the 62 patients, five had no malignancy and one with a tumour size of 33 mm had nodal metastasis. There were 56 lesions with a tumour size of ≤30 mm, wherein nodal metastases, vascular and/or lymphatic invasions were not observed. Conclusion For one-fifth of the part-solid tumours, measurement of the solid component was difficult. Moreover, these lesions had low invasiveness, especially in T1. The measurement of the solid portion and the classification of T1 in 1-cm increments may be complex.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 558-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eui Jin Hwang ◽  
Chang Min Park ◽  
Youngjin Ryu ◽  
Sang Min Lee ◽  
Young Tae Kim ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 1028-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hang Su ◽  
Chenyang Dai ◽  
Yunlang She ◽  
Yijiu Ren ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document