Corrigendum to ‘Implementation fidelity of physiotherapist-delivered group education and exercise interventions to promote self-management in people with osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain: A rapid review Part II*’ [Manual Therapy 20/2 (2014) 1–8]

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Toomey ◽  
Laura Currie-Murphy ◽  
James Matthews ◽  
Deirdre A. Hurley
2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoung Kim ◽  
Kwan-sub Lee ◽  
Seok-Joo Choi ◽  
Chun-Bae Jeon ◽  
Gook-Joo Kim

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1096
Author(s):  
Boon Chong Kwok ◽  
Justin Xuan Li Lim ◽  
Pui Wah Kong

Exercise plays an important role in rehabilitating people with chronic low back pain. Aerobic exercise and resistance training are general exercise strategies to manage chronic low back pain, but these strategies require longer intervention period to achieve clinical outcomes in pain reduction and functional improvements. Directional preference is recognised as an important exercise strategy in managing low back pain. The Clinical Pilates exercise method leverages on the directional preference of an individual to achieve clinical outcomes faster. Clinical Pilates is a hybrid of two of the best exercise interventions for low back pain, which are general Pilates and the McKenzie method. Due to the scarcity of Clinical Pilates literature, a review of its theory and studies was undertaken to provide a structured guide to the technique in managing people with chronic low back pain. Hypothetical algorithms are developed to support translation into clinical practice and future research studies. These algorithms are useful in the management of complex cases involving multiple directional trauma. Although limited, current evidence suggests that the Clinical Pilates exercise method is safe and provides faster functional recovery in the early stage of rehabilitation and similar longer term outcomes as general exercises.


2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (7) ◽  
pp. 1478-1486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Crowe ◽  
Lisa Whitehead ◽  
Mary Jo Gagan ◽  
David Baxter ◽  
Avin Panckhurst

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. S91
Author(s):  
Byungmook Lim ◽  
Jiseon Ryu ◽  
Hyunmin Kim ◽  
Eunhye Hyun ◽  
Dongsu Kim

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 494-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haley Dvorak ◽  
Christina Kujat ◽  
Jason Brumitt

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e028259
Author(s):  
Joshua Brodie Farragher ◽  
Adrian Pranata ◽  
Gavin Williams ◽  
Doa El-Ansary ◽  
Selina M Parry ◽  
...  

IntroductionChronic low back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding optimal management. Exercise intervention is the most widely used treatment as it likely influences contributing factors such as physical and psychological. Literature evaluating the effects of exercise on CLBP is often generalised, non-specific and employs inconsistent outcome measures. Moreover, the mechanisms behind exercise-related improvements are poorly understood. Recently, research has emerged identifying associations between neuromuscular-biomechanical impairments and CLBP-related disability. This information can be used as the basis for more specific and, potentially more efficacious exercise interventions for CLBP patients.Methods and analysisNinety-four participants (including both males and females) with CLBP aged 18–65 who present for treatment to a Melbourne-based private physiotherapy practice will be recruited and randomised into one of two treatment groups. Following baseline assessment, participants will be randomly allocated to receive either: (i) strengthening exercises in combination with lumbar force accuracy training exercises or (ii) strengthening exercises alone. Participants will attend exercise sessions twice a week for 12 weeks, with assessments conducted at baseline, midway (ie, 6 weeks into the trial) and at trial completion. All exercise interventions will be supervised by a qualified physiotherapist trained in the intervention protocol. The primary outcome will be functional disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Index. Other psychosocial and mechanistic parameters will also be measured.Ethics and disseminationThis study was given approval by the University of Melbourne Behavioural and Social Sciences Human Ethics Sub-Committee on 8 August 2017, reference number 1 749 845. Results of the randomised controlled trial will be published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberACTRN12618000894291.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document