Study the seismic response of reinforced concrete high-rise building with dual framed-shear wall system considering the effect of soil structure interaction

Author(s):  
Wesam Al Agha ◽  
Waleed Alozzo Almorad ◽  
Nambiappan Umamaheswari ◽  
Amjad Alhelwani
2017 ◽  
Vol 738 ◽  
pp. 120-129
Author(s):  
Olga Ivankova ◽  
Marian Stellmach ◽  
Lenka Konecna

This paper deals with static and dynamic analysis of asymmetric high-rise building. Two alternatives have been analysed – without dilatation and with dilatation. Then, the influence of the dilatation was discussed. The building was located in 4th seismic area in Slovakia (Bratislava). The description of the building, applied load, considered soil-structure interaction, created calculating models, used analysis and obtained results are mentioned here. The conclusions and the photos of defective repairs of real structures are depicted at the end of the paper.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-164
Author(s):  
Umesh Jung Thapa ◽  
Ramesh Karki

In this paper, study of the response (base shear, time period, storey drift, storey displacement) of a structure is done for the tall building including basement with fixed base and with pile foundation considering Soil Structure Interaction (SSI). Finite element based program ETABS2016 v16.1.0 is used for the analysis of the superstructure. Seismic analysis is done to get the dynamic response of superstructure for two types of model,one model is with fixed baseand second is Model with Winkler spring for Chhaya Center, Thamel, a high rise building with 14 story including double basements. Itisobserved with the consideration of Soil Structure Interaction (SSI). The soil is replaced by spring and assigned at joints. El Centro earthquake (1940) is used for time history analysis. The response obtained due to SSI effect is compared with fixed based model. Results of analysis presented include the comparison of natural periods, base shears, displacements and overturning moment. It is observed that the natural periods increase and the base shears decrease as the base become more flexible.


2021 ◽  
Vol 242 ◽  
pp. 112550
Author(s):  
Hui Long ◽  
Zicheng Wang ◽  
Chunshun Zhang ◽  
Haiyang Zhuang ◽  
Wenzhao Chen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (48) ◽  
pp. 505-509
Author(s):  
Toshiharu ARAKAWA ◽  
Itaru TOKUNAGA ◽  
Ryuki TANIGUCHI ◽  
Naohiro NAKAMURA ◽  
Takuya KINOSHITA ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. e86819
Author(s):  
Nelson Andrés López Machado ◽  
Gabriela Perez ◽  
Christian Castro ◽  
Juan Carlos Vielma Perez ◽  
Leonardo José López Machado ◽  
...  

Structural engineers commonly design superstructures as fixed at the base and transmit the reactions to the infrastructure in order to design the foundation system and estimate the displacement of the soil while disregarding the change in seismic response that this induces. In this article, the foundation system was transformed into equivalent springs, and the seismic response in the linear range was compared and quantified, obtaining results such as increased periods, increased amounts of steel reinforcement in beams (between 7% and 25%) and columns (between 29% and 39%), an increase in the number of stirrups per linear meter (between 3% and 11% in columns and between 5% and 45% in beams) and drifts (between 1% and 14%), and a decrease in basal shear (up to 20%), which directly affects the design of the structure. This study concludes that the inclusion of the soil-structure interaction is necessary for structural design in the linear range.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document