3D printing helps improve biocompatibility of metallic implants

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie Donaldson
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shokouh Attarilar ◽  
Mahmoud Ebrahimi ◽  
Faramarz Djavanroodi ◽  
Yuanfei Fu ◽  
Liqiang Wang ◽  
...  

Additive manufacturing (AM) is among the most attractive methods to produce implants, the processes are very swift and it can be precisely controlled to meet patient’s requirement since they can be produced in exact shape, dimension, and even texture of different living tissues. Until now, lots of methods have emerged and used in this field with diverse characteristics. This review aims to comprehensively discuss 3D printing (3DP) technologies to manufacture metallic implants, especially on techniques and procedures. Various technologies based on their main properties are categorized, the effecting parameters are introduced, andthe history of AM technology is briefly analyzed. Subsequently, the utilization of these AM-manufactured components in medicine along with their effectual variables is discussed, and special attention is paid on to the production of porous scaffolds, taking pore size, density, etc., into consideration. Finally, 3DP of the popular metallic systems in medical applications such as titanium, Ti6Al4V, cobalt-chromium alloys, and shape memory alloys are studied. In general, AM manufactured implants need to comply with important requirements such as biocompatibility, suitable mechanical properties (strength and elastic modulus), surface conditions, custom-built designs, fast production, etc. This review aims to introduce the AM technologies in implant applications and find new ways to design more sophisticated methods and compatible implants that mimic the desired tissue functions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Indranath Mitra ◽  
Susmita Bose ◽  
William S. Dernell ◽  
Nairanjana Dasgupta ◽  
Chrissy Eckstrand ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junyi Liu ◽  
Nafisah Bte Mohd Rafiq ◽  
Lai Mun Wong ◽  
Shijie Wang

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has developed rapidly and demonstrates great potential in biomedical applications. Although 3D printing techniques have good control over the macrostructure of metallic implants, the surface properties have superior control over the tissue response. By focusing on the types of surface treatments, the osseointegration activity of the bone–implant interface is enhanced. Therefore, this review paper aims to discuss the surface functionalities of metallic implants regarding their physical structure, chemical composition, and biological reaction through surface treatment and bioactive coating. The perspective on the current challenges and future directions for development of surface treatment on 3D-printed implants is also presented.


Nature ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 494 (7436) ◽  
pp. 174-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Pawlyn
Keyword(s):  

Nature ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 588 (7839) ◽  
pp. 594-595
Author(s):  
Cameron Darkes-Burkey ◽  
Robert F. Shepherd
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Thomas Birtchnell ◽  
William Hoyle
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-90
Author(s):  
Y. M. Dovydenko ◽  
N. A. Ivanova ◽  
S. A. Chizhik ◽  
V. E. Agabekov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document