Hospital-at-home integrated care programme for older patients with orthopaedic conditions: Early community reintegration maximising physical function

Maturitas ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 65-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miquel Àngel Mas ◽  
Conxita Closa ◽  
Sebastià J. Santaeugènia ◽  
Marco Inzitari ◽  
Aida Ribera ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 925-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miquel À Mas ◽  
Marco Inzitari ◽  
Sergi Sabaté ◽  
Sebastià J Santaeugènia ◽  
Ramón Miralles

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 780-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conxita Closa ◽  
Miquel À. Mas ◽  
Sebastià J. Santaeugènia ◽  
Marco Inzitari ◽  
Aida Ribera ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
M.À. Mas ◽  
M. Inzitari ◽  
S. Sabaté ◽  
R. Miralles ◽  
S.J. Santaeugènia

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e020332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maaike A Pouw ◽  
Agneta H Calf ◽  
Barbara C van Munster ◽  
Jan C ter Maaten ◽  
Nynke Smidt ◽  
...  

IntroductionAn acute hospital admission is a stressful life event for older people, particularly for those with cognitive impairment. The hospitalisation is often complicated by hospital-associated geriatric syndromes, including delirium and functional loss, leading to functional decline and nursing home admission. Hospital at Home care aims to avoid hospitalisation-associated adverse outcomes in older patients with cognitive impairment by providing hospital care in the patient’s own environment.Methods and analysisThis randomised, non-blinded feasibility trial aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial in terms of the recruitment, use and acceptability of Hospital at Home care for older patients with cognitive impairment. The quality of care will be evaluated and the advantages and disadvantages of the Hospital at Home care programme compared with usual hospital care. Eligible patients will be randomised either to Hospital at Home care in their own environment or usual hospital care. The intervention consists of hospital level care provided at patients’ homes, including visits from healthcare professionals, diagnostics (laboratory tests, blood cultures) and treatment. The control group will receive usual hospital care. Measurements will be conducted at baseline, during admission, at discharge and at 3 and 6 months after the baseline assessment.Ethics and disseminationInstitutional ethics approval has been granted. The findings will be disseminated through public lectures, professional and scientific conferences, as well as peer-reviewed journal articles. The study findings will contribute to knowledge on the implementation of Hospital at Home care for older patients with cognitive disorders. The results will be used to inform and support strategies to deliver eligible care to older patients with cognitive impairment.Trial registration numberNTR6581; Pre-results.


2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 336-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Jester ◽  
Karen Titchener ◽  
Janet Doyle-Blunden ◽  
Christine Caldwell

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to share good practice with interested professionals, commissioners and health service managers regarding the development of an evidence-based approach to evaluation of an integrated care service providing acute level care for patients in their own homes in South London called the Guys and St Thomas’ @home service. Design/methodology/approach – A literature review related to Hospital at Home (HH) schemes was carried out with an aim of scoping approaches used during previous evaluations of HH type interventions to inform the development of an evaluation strategy for @home. The results of the review were then applied to the Donabedian conceptual model: Structure; Process; and Outcome and contextualised to the population being served by the scheme to ensure a robust, practical and comprehensive approach to evaluation. Findings – Due to the heterogeneity of the studies it was not possible to conduct a systematic review or meta-analysis. In total, 28 studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria and included both HH to facilitate early discharge and admission prevention across a wide range of conditions. The key finding was there is a dearth of literature evaluating staff preparation to work on HH, models of delivery, specifically integrated care and trans-disciplinary working and few studies included the experiences of family carers. Originality/value – This paper will be of value to those involved in the commissioning and delivery of HH and other models of integrated care services type services and will help to inform evaluation strategies that are practical, evidence based and include all stakeholder perspectives.


2012 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. S138-S139 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Mas ◽  
S. Gámez ◽  
V. Delgado ◽  
J.A. González-Ares

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (s2) ◽  
pp. 367
Author(s):  
Elisa Valía-Cotanda ◽  
Alejandro Gil-Salmerón ◽  
Tamara Alhambra-Borrás ◽  
Jorge Garcés-Ferrer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document