Cooked color of precooked ground beef patties manufactured with mature bull trimmings

Meat Science ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 41-49
Author(s):  
Jace J. Hollenbeck ◽  
Jason K. Apple ◽  
Janeal W.S. Yancey ◽  
Tim M. Johnson ◽  
Kaleigh N. Kerns ◽  
...  
Meat Science ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 478
Author(s):  
J.J. Hollenbeck⁎ ◽  
J.K. Apple ◽  
J.W.S. Yancey ◽  
K.N. Kerns ◽  
A.N. Young

2000 ◽  
Vol 63 (10) ◽  
pp. 1389-1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. G. LYON ◽  
B. W. BERRY ◽  
D. SODERBERG ◽  
NELSON CLINCH

An interlaboratory study was undertaken to assess the frequency that cooked color of ground beef patties appeared brown at internal temperatures of 52.7°C (135°F), 65.6°C (150°F), 71.1°C (160°F), and 79.4°C (175°F). In general, as internal cooked temperature of the patties increased, the following results were observed in the patties: (i) more brown meat color, (ii) less pink or red juice color, and (iii) more cooked texture. However, brown meat color occurred prematurely at the two lower internal temperatures (57.2°C/135°F and 65.6°C/150°F) that are insufficient to eliminate foodborne pathogens without holding times. The common consumer practice of freezing bulk ground beef, followed by overnight thawing in a refrigerator, led to substantial premature brown color in patties cooked from this product. In addition, at 71.1°C (160°F), recognized to be the lowest temperature for cooking ground beef safely in the home, meat color, juice color, and texture appearance were not fully apparent as doneness indicators. In fact, at no temperature studied did 100% of the patties appear done when evaluated by the criteria of no red or pink in the meat, no red or pink in the juices, or by texture appearance. Patties in this study were evaluated under a set protocol for forming the products, cooking, and viewing under the same lighting conditions. Other preparation conditions are possible and may produce different results. Thus, temperature to which patties have been cooked cannot be judged by color and appearance. This study provided the evidence to support the message to consumers regarding cooking of beef patties of “use an accurate food thermometer and cook beef patties to 160°F (71.1°C)” in place of messages based on consumer judgment of cooked color.


1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. HAGUE ◽  
K.E. WARREN ◽  
M.C. HUNT ◽  
D.H. KROPF ◽  
C.L. KASTNER ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.E. WARREN ◽  
M.C. HUNT ◽  
D.H. KROPF ◽  
M.A. HAGUE ◽  
C.L. WALDNER ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
ARMAND V. CARDELLO ◽  
JOHN SECRIST ◽  
JOSEPH SMITH

1999 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. TUTTLE ◽  
T. GOMEZ ◽  
M. P. DOYLE ◽  
J. G. WELLS ◽  
T. ZHAO ◽  
...  

Between November 1992 and February 1993, a large outbreak of Escherichia coli O157[ratio ]H7 infections occurred in the western USA and was associated with eating ground beef patties at restaurants of one fast-food chain. Restaurants that were epidemiologically linked with cases served patties produced on two consecutive dates; cultures of recalled ground beef patties produced on those dates yielded E. coli O157[ratio ]H7 strains indistinguishable from those isolated from patients, confirming the vehicle of illness. Seventy-six ground beef patty samples were cultured quantitatively for E. coli O157[ratio ]H7. The median most probable number of organisms was 1·5 per gram (range, <0·3–15) or 67·5 organisms per patty (range, <13·5–675). Correlation of the presence of E. coli O157[ratio ]H7 with other bacterial indicators yielded a significant association between coliform count and the presence of E. coli O157[ratio ]H7 (P=0·04). A meat traceback to investigate possible sources of contamination revealed cattle were probably initially colonized with E. coli O157[ratio ]H7, and that their slaughter caused surface contamination of meat, which once combined with meat from other sources, resulted in a large number of contaminated ground beef patties. Microbiological testing of meat from lots consumed by persons who became ill was suggestive of an infectious dose for E. coli O157[ratio ]H7 of fewer than 700 organisms. These findings present a strong argument for enforcing zero tolerance for this organism in processed food and for markedly decreasing contamination of raw ground beef. Process controls that incorporate microbiological testing of meat may assist these efforts.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iulia Movileanu ◽  
Máryuri T. Núñez de González ◽  
Brian Hafley ◽  
Rhonda K. Miller ◽  
Jimmy T. Keeton

Fresh ground beef patties with (1) no antioxidant (control), (2) 0.02% butylated hydroxyanisole/butylated hydroxytoluene (BHA/BHT), (3) 3% dried plum puree, or (4) 0.25% rosemary extract were aerobically packaged, irradiated at target doses of 0, 1.5, or 2.0 kGy (1.7 and 2.3 kGy actual doses), and stored at C. The samples were evaluated for lipid oxidation on 0, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of storage after irradiation. When compared to the control, all antioxidant treatments were effective in retarding () irradiation-induced lipid oxidation during storage as determined by 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARs) values. Rosemary extracts had the same antioxidant effect () as BHA/BHT in irradiated and nonirradiated beef patties, followed by the dried plum puree treatment. Irradiation increased TBARs values, but no differences were noted in oxidation between irradiation dose levels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document