A review of setup error in supine breast radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikneswary Batumalai ◽  
Lois Holloway ◽  
Geoff P. Delaney
2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideomi Yamashita ◽  
Akihiro Haga ◽  
Yayoi Hayakawa ◽  
Kae Okuma ◽  
Kiyoshi Yoda ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153303381985384
Author(s):  
Wei Wang ◽  
Ting Yu ◽  
Min Xu ◽  
Qian Shao ◽  
Yingjie Zhang ◽  
...  

Objective: To compare differences in setup error assessment and correction between planar kilovolt images and cone beam computed tomography images for external beam partial breast irradiation during free breathing. Methods: Nineteen patients who received external beam partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery were recruited. Interfraction setup error was acquired using planar kilovolt images and cone beam computed tomography. After online setup correction, the residual error was calculated, and the setup error was compared. The residual error and setup margin were quantified for planar kilovolt and cone beam computed tomography images. Results: The largest setup error was observed in the anteroposterior direction for both cone beam computed tomography and planar kilovolt imaging (−1.45 mm, 1.74 mm). The cone beam computed tomography–based setup error (systematic error [Σ]) was less than the planar kilovolt images based on Σ in the anteroposterior direction (–1.2 mm vs 2.00 mm; P = .005), and no significant differences were observed for random error (σ) in 3 dimensions ( P = .948, .376, .314). After online setup correction, cone beam computed tomography significantly reduced the residual setup error compared with planar kilovolt images in the anteroposterior direction (Σ: −0.20 mm vs 0.50 mm, P = .008; σ: 0.45 mm vs 1.34 mm, P = .002). The cone beam computed tomography–based setup margin was smaller than the planar kilovolt image-based setup margin in the anteroposterior direction (−1.39 mm vs 5.57 mm, P = .003; 0.00 mm vs 3.20 mm, P = .003). Conclusions: Discrepancy between the setup errors observed with planar kilovolt and cone beam computed tomography was obvious in the anteroposterior direction. Compared to cone beam computed tomography, the elapsed treatment time was smaller when the initial alignment used kilovolt planar imaging. Whether using planar kilovolt or cone beam computed tomography, residual errors can be reduced to 1.5 mm for external beam partial breast irradiation procedures.


2011 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemieke De Puysseleyr ◽  
Liv Veldeman ◽  
Evelien Bogaert ◽  
Carlos De Wagter ◽  
Wilfried De Neve

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153303381982586
Author(s):  
Weifeng Li ◽  
Zhuoran Jiang ◽  
Kaiyue Chu ◽  
Jianhua Jin ◽  
Yun Ge ◽  
...  

Purpose: To develop an infrared optical method of reducing surface-based registration error caused by respiration to improve radiotherapy setup accuracy for patients with abdominal or pelvic tumors. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients with abdominal or pelvic tumors who received radiation therapy were prospectively included in our study. All patients were immobilized with vacuum cushion and underwent cone-beam computed tomography to validate positioning error before treatment. For each patient, after his or her setup based on markers fixed on immobilization device, initial positioning errors in patient left-right, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior directions were validated by cone-beam computed tomography. Then, our method calculated mismatch between patient and immobilization device based on surface registration by interpolating between expiratory- and inspiratory-phase surface to find the specific phase to best match the surface in planning computed tomography scans. After adjusting the position of treatment couch by the shift proposed by our method, a second cone-beam computed tomography was performed to determine the final positioning error. A comparison between initial and final setup error will be made to validate the effectiveness of our method. Results: Final positioning error confirmed by cone-beam computed tomography is 1.59 (1.82), 1.61 (1.84), and 1.31 (1.38) mm, reducing initial setup error by 24.52%, 51.04%, and 53.63% in patient left-right, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior directions, respectively. Wilcoxon test showed that our method significantly reduced the 3-dimensional distance of positioning error ( P < .001). Conclusion: Our method can significantly improve the setup precision for patients with abdominal or pelvic tumors in a noninvasive way by reducing the surface-based registration error caused by respiration.


2013 ◽  
Vol 189 (11) ◽  
pp. 945-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. De Puysseleyr ◽  
T. Mulliez ◽  
A. Gulyban ◽  
E. Bogaert ◽  
T. Vercauteren ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document