Dynamic behaviour of a diffusion layer around a cation-exchange membrane in an external electric field

2011 ◽  
Vol 88 (8) ◽  
pp. 1789-1791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miloš Svoboda ◽  
Jiří Kratochvíla ◽  
Jiří Lindner ◽  
Michal Přibyl ◽  
Dalimil Šnita
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (42) ◽  
pp. 20836-20843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seungbo Ryu ◽  
Jae-Hun Kim ◽  
Ju-Young Lee ◽  
Seung-Hyeon Moon

Nafion, the most popular cation exchange membrane, was cast while charged in an electric field to enhance the proton conductivity of the membrane.


1974 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 2653-2670
Author(s):  
John F. Belliveau ◽  
Edward G. Bobalek ◽  
Gerald L. Simard

2002 ◽  
Vol 90 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Gasser ◽  
E. E. Zaki

SummaryElectrodialysis has been investigated as a method to enhance the transport of U(VI), Th(IV) and lanthanides through Nafion cation exchange membrane I and impregnated with HDEHP-kerosene II. The recovery factor of U(VI) through Nafion cation exchange membrane with and without the applied electric field was 0.8 and 0.14, respectively. The transport process of U(VI) through ion exchange membrane was studied as a function of variation of nitric acid concentration in the feed solution, HDEHP concentration in the membrane stripping solution concentration, pH of the feed solution and effect of electric field. From this study the cationic flux of U(VI) through Nafion I and impregnated with HDEHP-kerosene II was 5.2 × 10


2021 ◽  
Vol 237 ◽  
pp. 116575
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Tanaka ◽  
Shin-ichi Sawada ◽  
Tetsuya Yamaki ◽  
Takehide Kodaira ◽  
Takehiro Kimura ◽  
...  

Membranes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
AHM Golam Hyder ◽  
Brian A. Morales ◽  
Malynda A. Cappelle ◽  
Stephen J. Percival ◽  
Leo J. Small ◽  
...  

Electrodialysis (ED) desalination performance of different conventional and laboratory-scale ion exchange membranes (IEMs) has been evaluated by many researchers, but most of these studies used their own sets of experimental parameters such as feed solution compositions and concentrations, superficial velocities of the process streams (diluate, concentrate, and electrode rinse), applied electrical voltages, and types of IEMs. Thus, direct comparison of ED desalination performance of different IEMs is virtually impossible. While the use of different conventional IEMs in ED has been reported, the use of bioinspired ion exchange membrane has not been reported yet. The goal of this study was to evaluate the ED desalination performance differences between novel laboratory‑scale bioinspired IEM and conventional IEMs by determining (i) limiting current density, (ii) current density, (iii) current efficiency, (iv) salinity reduction in diluate stream, (v) normalized specific energy consumption, and (vi) water flux by osmosis as a function of (a) initial concentration of NaCl feed solution (diluate and concentrate streams), (b) superficial velocity of feed solution, and (c) applied stack voltage per cell-pair of membranes. A laboratory‑scale single stage batch-recycle electrodialysis experimental apparatus was assembled with five cell‑pairs of IEMs with an active cross-sectional area of 7.84 cm2. In this study, seven combinations of IEMs (commercial and laboratory-made) were compared: (i) Neosepta AMX/CMX, (ii) PCA PCSA/PCSK, (iii) Fujifilm Type 1 AEM/CEM, (iv) SUEZ AR204SZRA/CR67HMR, (v) Ralex AMH-PES/CMH-PES, (vi) Neosepta AMX/Bare Polycarbonate membrane (Polycarb), and (vii) Neosepta AMX/Sandia novel bioinspired cation exchange membrane (SandiaCEM). ED desalination performance with the Sandia novel bioinspired cation exchange membrane (SandiaCEM) was found to be competitive with commercial Neosepta CMX cation exchange membrane.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document