Comparative genome analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum GB-LP3 provides candidates of survival-related genetic factors

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 218-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soomin Jeon ◽  
Jaehoon Jung ◽  
Kwondo Kim ◽  
DongAhn Yoo ◽  
Chanho Lee ◽  
...  
BMC Genomics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikas C. Ghattargi ◽  
Meghana A. Gaikwad ◽  
Bharati S. Meti ◽  
Yogesh S. Nimonkar ◽  
Kunal Dixit ◽  
...  

Genomics ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. 404-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen-Jian Liu ◽  
Rui Wang ◽  
Fu-Ming Gong ◽  
Xiao-Feng Liu ◽  
Hua-Jun Zheng ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sander Wuyts ◽  
Camille Nina Allonsius ◽  
Stijn Wittouck ◽  
Sofie Thys ◽  
Bart Lievens ◽  
...  

Genetics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 147 (1) ◽  
pp. 289-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Ehrlich ◽  
David Sankoff ◽  
Joseph H Nadeau

Abstract An important problem in comparative genome analysis has been defining reliable measures of synteny conservation. The published analytical measures of synteny conservation have limitations. Nonindependence of comparisons, conserved and disrupted syntenies that are as yet unidentified, and redundant rearrangements lead to systematic errors that tend to overestimate the degree of conservation. We recently derived methods to estimate the total number of conserved syntenies within the genome, counting both those that have already been described and those that remain to be discovered. With this method, we show that ~65% of the conserved syntenies have already been identified for humans and mice, that rates of synteny disruption vary ~25-fold among mammalian lineages, and that despite strong selection against reciprocal translocations, inter-chromosome rearrangements occurred approximately fourfold more often than inversions and other intra-chromosome rearrangements, at least for lineages leading to humans and mice.


2011 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 1844-1852 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cornelissen ◽  
S. C. Hardies ◽  
O. V. Shaburova ◽  
V. N. Krylov ◽  
W. Mattheus ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document