Comparison of extraction procedures for the determination of mesosulfuron methyl and iodosulfuron methyl sodium from soil and wheat using Response surface modelling

2021 ◽  
pp. 106456
Author(s):  
Harshdeep Kaur ◽  
Pervinder Kaur
Metals ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Abdulhadi ◽  
Syarifah Ahmad ◽  
Izwan Ismail ◽  
Mahadzir Ishak ◽  
Ghusoon Mohammed

Rhizosphere ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 134-140
Author(s):  
Kayeen Vadakkan ◽  
Ramya Gunasekaran ◽  
Abbas Alam Choudhury ◽  
Ashwini Ravi ◽  
Shyamala Arumugham ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Siti Khadijah Hubadillah ◽  
Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan Othman ◽  
Paran Gani ◽  
Ahmad Fauzi Ismail ◽  
Mukhlis A. Rahman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 2177-2192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siva Krishna Dasari ◽  
Abbas Cheddad ◽  
Petter Andersson

AbstractThe design of aircraft engines involves computationally expensive engineering simulations. One way to solve this problem is the use of response surface models to approximate the high-fidelity time-consuming simulations while reducing computational time. For a robust design, sensitivity analysis based on these models allows for the efficient study of uncertain variables’ effect on system performance. The aim of this study is to support sensitivity analysis for a robust design in aerospace engineering. For this, an approach is presented in which random forests (RF) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) are explored to handle linear and non-linear response types for response surface modelling. Quantitative experiments are conducted to evaluate the predictive performance of these methods with Turbine Rear Structure (a component of aircraft) case study datasets for response surface modelling. Furthermore, to test these models’ applicability to perform sensitivity analysis, experiments are conducted using mathematical test problems (linear and non-linear functions) and their results are presented. From the experimental investigations, it appears that RF fits better on non-linear functions compared with MARS, whereas MARS fits well on linear functions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document