scholarly journals Mrc1 and DNA Polymerase ɛ Function Together in Linking DNA Replication and the S Phase Checkpoint

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huiqiang Lou ◽  
Makiko Komata ◽  
Yuki Katou ◽  
Zhiyun Guan ◽  
Clara C. Reis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

scholarly journals DNA polymerase ϵ links the DNA replication machinery to the S phase checkpoint

Cell ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony A Navas ◽  
Zheng Zhou ◽  
Stephen J Elledge
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Machinery ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

scholarly journals The yeast S phase checkpoint enables replicating chromosomes to bi-orient and restrain spindle extension during S phase distress

2005 ◽  
Vol 168 (7) ◽  
pp. 999-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Bachant ◽  
Shannon R. Jessen ◽  
Sarah E. Kavanaugh ◽  
Candida S. Fielding
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Origin Of Replication ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Hydroxyurea Treatment ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

The budding yeast S phase checkpoint responds to hydroxyurea-induced nucleotide depletion by preventing replication fork collapse and the segregation of unreplicated chromosomes. Although the block to chromosome segregation has been thought to occur by inhibiting anaphase, we show checkpoint-defective rad53 mutants undergo cycles of spindle extension and collapse after hydroxyurea treatment that are distinct from anaphase cells. Furthermore, chromatid cohesion, whose dissolution triggers anaphase, is dispensable for S phase checkpoint arrest. Kinetochore–spindle attachments are required to prevent spindle extension during replication blocks, and chromosomes with two centromeres or an origin of replication juxtaposed to a centromere rescue the rad53 checkpoint defect. These observations suggest that checkpoint signaling is required to generate an inward force involved in maintaining preanaphase spindle integrity during DNA replication distress. We propose that by promoting replication fork integrity under these conditions Rad53 ensures centromere duplication. Replicating chromosomes can then bi-orient in a cohesin-independent manner to restrain untimely spindle extension.

scholarly journals Silencing of human DNA polymerase λ causes replication stress and is synthetically lethal with an impaired S phase checkpoint

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 229-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Zucca ◽  
Federica Bertoletti ◽  
Ursula Wimmer ◽  
Elena Ferrari ◽  
Giuliano Mazzini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Human Dna ◽  
Dna Polymerase Λ ◽  
Synthetically Lethal ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

scholarly journals A Coordinated Temporal Interplay of Nucleosome Reorganization Factor, Sister Chromatin Cohesion Factor, and DNA Polymerase α Facilitates DNA Replication

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (21) ◽  
pp. 9568-9579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanjiao Zhou ◽  
Teresa S.-F. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Terminal Region ◽  
Replication Complex ◽  
Dna Polymerase Α ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Phase Progression

ABSTRACT DNA replication depends critically upon chromatin structure. Little is known about how the replication complex overcomes the nucleosome packages in chromatin during DNA replication. To address this question, we investigate factors that interact in vivo with the principal initiation DNA polymerase, DNA polymerase α (Polα). The catalytic subunit of budding yeast Polα (Pol1p) has been shown to associate in vitro with the Spt16p-Pob3p complex, a component of the nucleosome reorganization system required for both replication and transcription, and with a sister chromatid cohesion factor, Ctf4p. Here, we show that an N-terminal region of Polα (Pol1p) that is evolutionarily conserved among different species interacts with Spt16p-Pob3p and Ctf4p in vivo. A mutation in a glycine residue in this N-terminal region of POL1 compromises the ability of Pol1p to associate with Spt16p and alters the temporal ordered association of Ctf4p with Pol1p. The compromised association between the chromatin-reorganizing factor Spt16p and the initiating DNA polymerase Pol1p delays the Pol1p assembling onto and disassembling from the late-replicating origins and causes a slowdown of S-phase progression. Our results thus suggest that a coordinated temporal and spatial interplay between the conserved N-terminal region of the Polα protein and factors that are involved in reorganization of nucleosomes and promoting establishment of sister chromatin cohesion is required to facilitate S-phase progression.

scholarly journals Divergent S Phase Checkpoint Activation Arising from Prereplicative Complex Deficiency Controls Cell Survival

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 3953-3964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Lau ◽  
Gary G. Chiang ◽  
Robert T. Abraham ◽  
Wei Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Multiple Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Diploid Cells ◽  
Prereplicative Complex ◽  
Stress Damage ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

The DNA replication machinery plays additional roles in S phase checkpoint control, although the identities of the replication proteins involved in checkpoint activation remain elusive. Here, we report that depletion of the prereplicative complex (pre-RC) protein Cdc6 causes human nontransformed diploid cells to arrest nonlethally in G1-G1/S and S phase, whereas multiple cancer cell lines undergo G1-G1/S arrest and cell death. These divergent phenotypes are dependent on the activation, or lack thereof, of an ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR)-dependent S phase checkpoint that inhibits replication fork progression. Although pre-RC deficiency induces chromatin structural alterations in both nontransformed and cancer cells that normally lead to ATR checkpoint activation, the sensor mechanisms in cancer cells seem to be compromised such that higher levels of DNA replication stress/damage are required to trigger checkpoint response. Our results suggest that therapy-induced disruption of pre-RC function might exert selective cytotoxic effects on tumor cells in human patients.

scholarly journals The human oncoprotein MDM2 induces replication stress eliciting early intra-S-phase checkpoint response and inhibition of DNA replication origin firing

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 926-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Frum ◽  
S. Singh ◽  
C. Vaughan ◽  
N. D. Mukhopadhyay ◽  
S. R. Grossman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Origin ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Dna Replication Origin ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

scholarly journals Activation of the DNA Damage Checkpoint in Mutants Defective in DNA Replication Initiation

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 4374-4382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Yin ◽  
Alexandra Monica Locovei ◽  
Gennaro D'Urso
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Dna Replication Initiation ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

In the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, blocks to DNA replication elongation trigger the intra-S phase checkpoint that leads to the activation of the Cds1 kinase. Cds1 is required to both prevent premature entry into mitosis and to stabilize paused replication forks. Interestingly, although Cds1 is essential to maintain the viability of mutants defective in DNA replication elongation, mutants defective in DNA replication initiation require the Chk1 kinase. This suggests that defects in DNA replication initiation can lead to activation of the DNA damage checkpoint independent of the intra-S phase checkpoint. This might result from reduced origin firing that leads to an increase in replication fork stalling or replication fork collapse that activates the G2 DNA damage checkpoint. We refer to the Chk1-dependent, Cds1-independent phenotype as the rid phenotype (for replication initiation defective). Chk1 is active in rid mutants, and rid mutant viability is dependent on the DNA damage checkpoint, and surprisingly Mrc1, a protein required for activation of Cds1. Mutations in Mrc1 that prevent activation of Cds1 have no effect on its ability to support rid mutant viability, suggesting that Mrc1 has a checkpoint-independent role in maintaining the viability of mutants defective in DNA replication initiation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document